Person ML told person M and PK regarding a trading program that will help in purchase and sell securities. ML informed that the securities were insured as well as controlled and monitored by the Federal Reserve. Person M and PK without confirming the existence of program start to sell interest in the program to investors. The investors were assured an extraordinary rate of return from 10 percent to 100 percent for the investment of $ 1 million without any risk. The investors were told that the banks will be utilized to ensure the full bank integrity of the transaction. The transaction was made in harmony with the international banking protocol and rules which guaranteed maximum security to the capital placement of the funder. The program raised $ 23million from twenty-two investors. The investors were not receiving any gain and the amount was used for personal spending. To explain: The requirement to establish the violation of SEC rules.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 28, Problem 9BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:Person ML told person M and PK regarding a trading program that will help in purchase and sell securities. ML informed that the securities were insured as well as controlled and monitored by the Federal Reserve. Person M and PK without confirming the existence of program start to sell interest in the program to investors. The investors were assured an extraordinary rate of return from 10 percent to 100 percent for the investment of $1 million without any risk. The investors were told that the banks will be utilized to ensure the full bank integrity of the transaction. The transaction was made in harmony with the international banking protocol and rules which guaranteed maximum security to the capital placement of the funder. The program raised $ 23million from twenty-two investors. The investors were not receiving any gain and the amount was used for personal spending.

To explain: The requirement to establish the violation of SEC rules.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:Person ML told person M and PK regarding a trading program that will help in purchase and sell securities. ML informed that the securities were insured as well as controlled and monitored by the Federal Reserve. Person M and PK without confirming the existence of program start to sell interest in the program to investors. The investors were assured an extraordinary rate of return from 10 percent to 100 percent for the investment of $1 million without any risk. The investors were told that the banks will be utilized to ensure the full bank integrity of the transaction. The transaction was made in harmony with the international banking protocol and rules which guaranteed maximum security to the capital placement of the funder. The program raised $ 23million from twenty-two investors. The investors were not receiving any gain and the amount was used for personal spending.

To explain:The responsibility of investors for the loss.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Considering the following statements true or false. 1.Circumstances whereby the CFA member breaches client confidentiality are acceptable in circumstances directed by the client in writing. 2.Mosaic theory damages the interest of all investors by disrupting the smooth functioning of forward markets and lowering investor confidence. 3.As a philosophical ethical principle, when analysing actions undertaken, it is acceptable that an act can be seen as good or bad regardless of the underlying/relevant circumstances. 4.As part of Standard IV, as a superior, it is not your responsibility to ensure ethical behaviour of your subordinates. 5.Premium investment services should be designed in such a way that, while beneficial to those who are in a position to take advantage of them, they are not unfairly disadvantages to other classes of clients.

Outline the ways the Securities Act has sought to fight insider trading.

Bailee had a balance of $422.88 in a check register. The bank notified Bailee that Nicholas had insufficient funds to cover his check that Bailee deposited. The bank indicated that Bailee's bank balance was being reduced. Bailee felt that this was unfair since she never "bounces" her own checks. Is she justified? Please explain.