Person DRR was the president of company GRT which was registered in Puerto Rico. Person J who was the brother of DRR worked as the firm’s accountant. Company GRT solicited funds from investors to invest the funds in low-risk, short-term, and high-yield securities. The amount received from the investors was not invested in the funds and was used for personal liabilities. To explain: The type of scheme mentioned in the case.

Question

Mikhail and Dana Jackson, doing business as M&D Enterprises, Inc., bought a retail electronics store under a franchise agreement from a national company, Tunes Hut. The Jacksons borrowed from State Bank to pay for the business and signed loan documents and a financing statement, which identified the Jacksons as "Debtors." Elsewhere on the financing statement, the bank identified "M&D Enterprises, Inc., Tunes Hut, Dana K. Jackson, Mikhail C. Jackson" as "Debtors." The statement covered, in part, the store inventory. The bank filed the financing statement with the proper government agency. Three years later, the store closed. Tunes Hut terminated the franchise and took possession of the inventory, claiming the Jacksons and M&D owed Tunes Hut $6,394.73. State Bank filed a suit in a state court against Tunes Hut, claiming a perfected security interest in the inventory with priority over Tunes Hut's claim. Did the bank's security interest take priority over Tunes Hut’s…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 28, Problem 8BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person DRR was the president of company GRT which was registered in Puerto Rico. Person J who was the brother of DRR worked as the firm’s accountant. Company GRT solicited funds from investors to invest the funds in low-risk, short-term, and high-yield securities. The amount received from the investors was not invested in the funds and was used for personal liabilities.

To explain:The type of scheme mentioned in the case.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:Person DRR was the president of company GRT which was registered in Puerto Rico. Person J who was the brother of DRR worked as the firm’s accountant. Company GRT solicited funds from investors to invest funds in low-risk, short-term, and high-yield securities. The amount received from the investors was not invested in the funds and was used for personal liabilities.

To explain:The potential consequence of the Ponzi scheme.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Mikhail and Dana Jackson, doing business as M&D Enterprises, Inc., bought a retail electronics store under a franchise agreement from a national company, Tunes Hut. The Jacksons borrowed from State Bank to pay for the business and signed loan documents and a financing statement, which identified the Jacksons as "Debtors." Elsewhere on the financing statement, the bank identified "M&D Enterprises, Inc., Tunes Hut, Dana K. Jackson, Mikhail C. Jackson" as "Debtors." The statement covered, in part, the store inventory. The bank filed the financing statement with the proper government agency. Three years later, the store closed. Tunes Hut terminated the franchise and took possession of the inventory, claiming the Jacksons and M&D owed Tunes Hut $6,394.73. State Bank filed a suit in a state court against Tunes Hut, claiming a perfected security interest in the inventory with priority over Tunes Hut's claim. Did the bank's security interest take priority over Tunes Hut’s…

Considering the following statements true or false. 1.Circumstances whereby the CFA member breaches client confidentiality are acceptable in circumstances directed by the client in writing. 2.Mosaic theory damages the interest of all investors by disrupting the smooth functioning of forward markets and lowering investor confidence. 3.As a philosophical ethical principle, when analysing actions undertaken, it is acceptable that an act can be seen as good or bad regardless of the underlying/relevant circumstances. 4.As part of Standard IV, as a superior, it is not your responsibility to ensure ethical behaviour of your subordinates. 5.Premium investment services should be designed in such a way that, while beneficial to those who are in a position to take advantage of them, they are not unfairly disadvantages to other classes of clients.

Using Banking law Jargon, Brent Braxton, Carlyle Christian and Deborah Drummond together provided three separate guarantees in writing to the National Commercial Bank (NCB) of (Your Jurisdiction) Limited, regarding the promissory notes issued by Anthony Limited to NCB. The guarantees were made by Deed for US$200,000 each and clearly stated that if Anthony Limited defaulted on the repayment of the US$200,000 the money would be repaid by each of the guarantors. The NCB has written to BB, CC and DD requesting the repayment of the borrowed sums. However, BB, CC and DD are contending that they are secondarily liable for repayment of the borrowed sums. You have been asked to prepare legal advice for the Board of Directors on this matter. What is the nature of the advice you will give to NCB?