Concept explainers
Case Summary:
SS company was established in 1892 which primarily sold watches via mail orders that relied on catalogs. The company changed the perspective of shopping as the catalog was delivered at their doorstep and the order was taken via mail. However, urban people's desire to purchase via standalone stores was also met as many stores were opened gradually. During the 1990s, there was a change in technology which also changed the way of shopping. People started purchasing goods online at competitive prices. Ss was burdened with overhead costs and was bureaucratic in nature. SS did not enter online marketing, but W’s profit grew. In 2004, SS was acquired by KEL, who acquired SS did not have retail experience but was an expert in finance. He acquired SS because he saw real estate value as the key. Under him, no importance was given to retailing stores, underinvestment was done in existing store maintenance, mismanagement was also an issue. Sales went down in 2013 and debt further escalated, and the company was losing annually $1 billion.
Interpretation:
Problem according to KEL’s perspective.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 2 Solutions
Gen Combo Looseleaf Management; Connect Access Card
- The case focuses on U.S. markets. How are European markets affected by holiday shopping?arrow_forwardIn the Lehman Brothers Fruad Case, what are the Impact or the effects of the fraud on the institution and give recommendations or remidal measures that the institutions could take to prevent this fraud.arrow_forwardThe board of directors of Megacorp Berhad, a public listed company comprises of executive directors as well as independent and non-executive directors. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is also the chairperson of the board of directors. A study shows that the lack of separation of the CEO and the chairmanship of the board of directors has led to the board being aligned to the management rather than the shareholders despite the presence of the independent non-executive directors. In addition, the study also shows that companies which have CEO duality are likely to have lower shareholder returns. The independent non-executive directors of the company subscribe to the view that directors have a legally mandated fiduciary duty to their shareholders to maximize the profit of the company. Thus, to them, ethical standards are less important than legal standards in the pursuit of making profit. (a) Describe the specific contributions that independent non-executive directors could make to…arrow_forward
- Why is Risk Management and Handling Conflicts in an Organization Important?arrow_forwardIdentify four major business risks of Myer Holdings Limited and provide a detailed explanation of why each factor is identified as a risk to the business. https://investor.myer.com.au/FormBuilder/_Resource/_module/dGngnzELxUikQxL5gb1cgA/file/Myer_Annual_Report_2020.pdfarrow_forwardWhat is the convention and incentive travel unit? And give an example of it.arrow_forward
- 1. Why is risk management considered to be a proactive management tool in managing a business?2. Among the eight principles of effective risk management as stipulated in Philippine National Standards 31000:2018(PNS ISO 31000:2018), which do you think should be prioritized by a tourism -related enterprise ? Explain clearly and concisely.arrow_forwardDisruptors are focused on a particular innovative technology or process in everything from mobile payments to insurance. they have been attacking some of the most profitable elements of the financial services value chain. This has been particularly damaging to the incumbents who have historically subsidized important but less profitable service offerings. Identify an existing and real life example on how a specific financial disruptor have affected a certain industry/company. How did the certain industry/company have mitigated the damaging effect of the Financial Disruptor?arrow_forwardReview the conflict of interest scenarios (parts 1 and 2). Identify the issue and indicate the regulation or best practice principle involved. How should the organization/provider respond to the issue? What should the organization/provider do to prevent future issues or mitigate any future harm/damage to the patient or the organization? The first scenario involves doctors who are financially motivated to prescribe certain medications or treatments, even if they may not be the best option for the patient. These doctors may receive kickbacks or incentives from pharmaceutical companies, leading to a conflict of interest that can compromise the quality of care. the second scenario involves doctors prioritizing their patients' well-being. These doctors strive to provide evidence-based recommendations and treatments that are in the best interest of their patients' health. They prioritize unbiased information and consider the individual needs and circumstances of each patientarrow_forward
- What a particular fault or weakness in the area of interpersonal and relationship building skills could effect an individual? What actions can be taken immediately, and sustain going forward, to ensure this is course corrected? If not addressed, how might this area impact to a Finance Professional? What, if any, complications might arise from the current Covid-19 situation that could impede progress in addressing this area?arrow_forwardWhat are the eligibility criteria for an employee to be covered under the ESI scheme? Are there any exceptions or exclusions?arrow_forwardWhat are the two key types of security policies and procedures that must be established to aid in Sarbanes-Oxley compliance?arrow_forward