Agency Costs Fountain Corporation’s economists estimate that a good business environment and a bad business environment are equally likely for the coming year. The managers of the company must choose between two mutually exclusive projects. Assume that the project the company chooses will be the firm’s only activity and that the firm will close one year from today. The company is obligated to make a $3,500 payment to bondholders at the end of the year. The projects have the same systematic risk but different volatilities. Consider the following information pertaining to the two projects:
- a. What is the expected value of the company if the low-volatility project is undertaken? What if the high-volatility project is undertaken? Which of the two strategies maximizes the expected value of the firm?
- b. What is the expected value of the company’s equity if the low-volatility project is undertaken? What is it if the high-volatility project is undertaken?
- c. Which project would the company’s stockholders prefer’? Explain.
- d. Suppose bondholders arc fully aware that stockholders might choose to maximize equity value rather than total firm value and opt for the high-volatility project. To minimize this agency cost, the firm's bondholders decide to use a bond covenant to stipulate that the bondholders can demand a higher payment if the company chooses to take on the high-volatility project. What payment to bondholders would make stockholders indifferent between the two projects?
a)
To determine: The expected value of the firm if the low volatility project is undertaken.
Introduction:
Cost of equity: It is a return that a company pays to its equity investors. A company’s equity cost signifies the compensation the market demands in substitute for owning the possessions and bearing the ownership risks
Explanation of Solution
The expected value of every project is the total of the probability of each state of the economy times the value in that economy state.
As this is only project for the firm, the firm value will be similar as the project value.
Calculate the low-volatility project value:
The probability of bad is 0.50, project payoff value (low volatility) for bad is $3,500 and project payoff value (low volatility) for good is $3,700.
Therefore, the low volatility project value is $3,600.
Calculate the high-volatility project value:
The probability of good is 0.50, project payoff value (high volatility) for bad is $2,900 and project payoff value (high volatility) for good is $4,300.
Therefore, the high volatility project value is $3,600.
b)
To determine: The expected value of the company’s equity if low volatility and high volatility project is undertaken.
Explanation of Solution
Explanation:
The equity value is the residual value of the firm after the company pays off bondholders. If the low-volatility project is decided, the company’s equity will be worth of $0 if the economy is bad and $200 if the economy is good. As these two scenarios are evenly probable, the anticipated value of the company’s equity is as follows:
Calculate the expected value of equity with low volatility project:
Therefore, the expected value of equity with low volatility project value is $100.
Calculate the expected value of equity with high volatility project:
Therefore, the expected value of equity with high volatility project value is $400.
c)
To determine: Which project should the company’s stockholder prefer.
Explanation of Solution
Risk-neutral investors should prefer the strategy with the greater expected value. Hence, the firm’s stockholders should choose the high-volatility project, since it maximize the anticipated worth of the firm’s equity.
d)
To determine: The returns that bondholders would make stockholders indifferent among the two given projects.
Explanation of Solution
To make stockholders in-different among the lower-volatility project and the higher-volatility project, the bondholders will require increase their required debt-payment so that the anticipated equity worth if the high-volatility project is chosen is equal to the expected worth of equity if the lower-volatility project is chosen. As shown in part b, the expected value of equity when the lower-volatility project selected is $100.
If the high-volatility project is preferred, the value of the company will have around $2,900 if the economy is bad and $4,300 when the economy is good. When the economy is under bad, the whole $2,900 will go to the stockholders and bondholders will obtain nothing.
If the economy is under good, stockholders will obtain the dissimilarity among $4,300, the overall worth of the company, and the necessary debt payment. Assume, X as the debt payment that bondholders will need if the high-volatility project is preferred. For stockholders to be dissimilar among the two projects, the anticipated equity value if the high-volatility project is preferred must be equal to $100.
Determine the value of X:
Therefore, the debt payment value will be $4,100,
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 17 Solutions
EBK CORPORATE FINANCE
- Apex Corporation’s economic unit estimates that the probability of a good business environment next year is equal to the probability of a bad environment. Knowing that, the managers of Apex must choose between two mutually exclusive projects, project A and project B, which will provide the only assets of the firm. Apex has outstanding a zero coupon bond with a face value of $300m, maturing next year, when the project chosen will have its only payoff. The firm has currently available cash of $200m. Project A requires an initial investment of $100m, while project B requires $200m; final payoffs one year from now are: State of the economy: Good. Bad Probability: 1/2 1/2 Project A 400m 300m Project B 800m. 50marrow_forwardA company puts together a set of cash flow projections and calculates an IRR of 25% for the project. The firm's cost of capital is about 10%. The CEO maintains that the favorability of the calculated IRR relative to the cost of capital makes the project an easy choice for acceptance and urges management to move forward immediately. i. Should this project be evaluated using different standards? ii. How does the possibility of bankruptcy as a result of the project affect the analysis? iii. Are capital budgeting rules still appropriate?arrow_forwardLimited Corporation is looking to replace a machine that is expected to increase productivity and, thereby, revenue. The cost of the machine is $100,000. Revenue is expected to increase by $20,000 in the first year, $50,000 in the second year, and $80,000 in the third year. After the third year, the company plans substitute the machine with a higher performance one. The alternative to this investment is to buy $100,000 in risky corporate bonds that currently yield 10% annually. Explain the feasibility of this project by computing the NPV.arrow_forward
- Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows: The system will cost 9,000,000 and last 10 years. The companys cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchasedeven if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of 1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of 300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the companys decision?arrow_forwardHemmingway, Inc. is considering a $5 million research and development (R&D) project. Profit projections appear promising, but Hemmingway’s president is concerned because the probability that the R&D project will be successful is only 0.50. Furthermore, the president knows that even if the project is successful, it will require that the company build a new production facility at a cost of $20 million in order to manufacture the product. If the facility is built, uncertainty remains about the demand and thus uncertainty about the profit that will be realized. Another option is that if the R&D project is successful, the company could sell the rights to the product for an estimated $25 million. Under this option, the company would not build the $20 million production facility. The decision tree follows. The profit projection for each outcome is shown at the end of the branches. For example, the revenue projection for the high demand outcome is $59 million. However, the cost of the R&D project ($5 million) and the cost of the production facility ($20 million) show the profit of this outcome to be $59 – $5 – $20 = $34 million. Branch probabilities are also shown for the chance events. Analyze the decision tree to determine whether the company should undertake the R&D project. If it does, and if the R&D project is successful, what should the company do? What is the expected value of your strategy? What must the selling price be for the company to consider selling the rights to the product? Develop a risk profile for the optimal strategy.arrow_forwardThe J.R. Ryland Computer Company is considering a plant expansion to enable the company to begin production of a new computer product. The companys president must determine whether to make the expansion a medium- or large-scale project. Demand for the new product is uncertain, which for planning purposes may be low demand, medium demand, or high demand. The probability estimates for demand are 0.20, 0.50, and 0.30, respectively. Letting x and y indicate the annual profit in thousands of dollars, the firms planners developed the following profit forecasts for the medium-and large-scale expansion projects. a. Compute the expected value for the profit associated with the two expansion alternatives. Which decision is preferred for the objective of maximizing the expected profit? b. Compute the variance for the profit associated with the two expansion alternatives. Which decision is preferred for the objective of minimizing the risk or uncertainty?arrow_forward
- The payback period The payback method helps firms establish and identify a maximum acceptable payback period that helps in their capital budgeting decisions. Consider the case of Cold Goose Metal Works Inc.: Cold Goose Metal Works Inc. is a small firm, and several of its managers are worried about how soon the firm will be able to recover its initial investment from Project Delta’s expected future cash flows. To answer this question, Cold Goose’s CFO has asked that you compute the project’s payback period using the following expected net cash flows and assuming that the cash flows are received evenly throughout each year. Complete the following table and compute the project’s conventional payback period. For full credit, complete the entire table. (Note: Round the conventional payback period to two decimal places. If your answer is negative, be sure to use a minus sign in your answer.) Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Expected cash flow -$6,000,000…arrow_forward1. Differentiate between centralized and decentralized operations. 2. Why do you think capital investment decisions are some of the most important decisions that management makes? 3. A company could sell a building for $250,000 or lease it for $2,500 per month. Without making computations,what would need to be considered in determining which of the two is preferred?arrow_forwardThe Weiland Computer Corporation is trying to choose between the following mutually exclusive design projects, P1 and P2: Year 0 1 2 3 Cash flows (P1) -$53,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 Cash flow (P2) -$16,000 9,100 9,100 9,100 If the discount rate is 10 percent and the company applies the profitability index (PI) decision rule, which project should the firm accept? If the firm applies the Net Present Value (NPV) decision rule, which project should it take? Are your answers in (a) and (b) different? Explain why?arrow_forward
- IRR and NPV approaches Hotel Amazing is attempting to select the best of a group of independent projects competing for the firm's fixed capital budget of $5.5 million. Management recognizes that any unused portion of this budget will earn less than the 12% cost of capital, thereby resulting in a present value of inflows that is less than the initial investment. A summary of the independent projects are shown in the following table. see image for table a) Use the internal rate of return (IRR) approach to select the best group of projects. b) Use the net present value ( NPV) approach to select the best group of projects. c) Are the projects selected in parts a and b the same? Explain your answer. d) Which projects should Hotel Amazing implement? Why? Fast answerarrow_forwardWhich of the following should be considered when a company estimates the cash flows used to analyze a proposed project? Group of answer choices Since the firm's director of capital budgeting spent some of her time last year to evaluate the new project, a portion of her salary for that year should be charged to the project's initial cost. The company spent and expensed $10 million on a marketing study before its current analysis regarding whether to accept or reject the project. The firm would borrow all the money used to finance the new project, and the interest on this debt would be $1.5 million per year. The new project is expected to reduce sales of one of the company's existing products by 5%. The company has spent and expensed $1 million on R&D associated with the new project.arrow_forwardCapital budgeting GAP, a retail chain, is considering buying a registered software from Microsoft so that it can more effectively deal with its retail sales. The software costs $750,000 and will be depreciated down to zero using the straight-line method over its five-year economic life. The marketing department predicts the sales will be $600,000 per year for the next three years, after which the market will cease to exist. The cost of one unit sold and operating expenses are predicted to be 25% of sales. After three years the software can be sold for $400,000. The GAP also needs to add net working capital of $25,000 immediately and maintain it for the next two years. The corporate tax rate is 35%. a) Compute the unlevered net income (EBIT minus taxes), and the free cash flows. Remember to consider the recovery value for the software program, and the tax benefit or cost. (Assume that GAP has other profitable businesses such that tax benefits become effective.) [25%] 3 Continued…arrow_forward
- EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENTCornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage Learning