A company puts together a set of cash flow projections and calculates an IRR of 25% for the project. The firm's cost of capital is about 10%. The CEO maintains that the favorability of the calculated IRR relative to the cost of capital makes the project an easy choice for acceptance and urges management to move forward immediately. i. Should this project be evaluated using different standards? ii. How does the possibility of bankruptcy as a result of the project affect the analysis? iii. Are capital budgeting rules still appropriate?

Consider an all-equity firm that is run by a manager who acts in the best interest of existing shareholders. The value of the firm's assets in place is either $50 or $210. The firm has an investment project that requires an investment of $45. The only way to finance this project is by issuing equity to new investors in a competitive stock market. The project generates a sure, risk-free cash flow of $50 next year (i.e. this cash flow does not depend on the value of assets in place). Everyone is risk neutral and there is no discounting. a. Suppose that everyone, including the manager, believes that the assets in place are worth $50 with probability ½ and $210 with probability 2. What fraction a of the firm's equity has to be issued to new investors to raise $45? Does the manager want to issue equity?

. The payback period The payback method helps firms establish and identify a maximum acceptable payback period that helps in their capital budgeting decisions. Consider the case of Cold Goose Metal Works Inc.: Cold Goose Metal Works Inc. is a small firm, and several of its managers are worried about how soon the firm will be able to recover its initial investment from Project Delta’s expected future cash flows. To answer this question, Cold Goose’s CFO has asked that you compute the project’s payback period using the following expected net cash flows and assuming that the cash flows are received evenly throughout each year.   Complete the following table and compute the project’s conventional payback period. For full credit, complete the entire table. (Note: Round the conventional payback period to two decimal places. If your answer is negative, be sure to use a minus sign in your answer.)   Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Expected cash flow -$6,000,000…

A company manager asked you to evaluate an investment opportunity. Select and explain two (2) investment criteria you will use to make a decision as to whether to accept or reject the opportunity. You are the CFO of Midas Mining Ltd and the company is looking to expand its mining operations. Your staff have narrowed it down to two (2) projects, with the cash flows presented in the table below. However, given the substantial cash outlay, your company can only choose one of the projects (A or B). Information Project A Project B Cost $5 550 000 $6 640 000 Required: a)  Perform a project evaluation, using the Net Present Value (NPV) The prevailing discount rate is 12%. b)  Identify which project (if any) should be accepted by Midas Mining Ltd.

Based on the information that you learned about capital structure and budgeting, determine what the optimal capital structure should be for Gentry. You will need to determine how much equity (common stock) the company will offer in the IPO and how much debt the company should assume in their global expansion to meet the goal of $50 million. Provide your recommendation in a 500-word APA formatted paper. Determine what capital structure will work best with your initial assessment. Describe the structure using the ratios. Include the dollar amount of equity (common stock) the company should issue in the IPO and how much debt the company should use for this expansion to reach the $50 million goal. Explain your rationale. Note: there is no single answer to the question of the firm's optimal capital structure. Your assessment is weighted more heavily toward your logical explanation rather than having the correct values for debt and equity.

Al Hansen, the newly appointed vice president of finance of Berkshire Instruments, was eager to talk to his investment banker about future financing for the firm. One of Al’s first assignments was to determine the firm’s cost of capital. In assessing the weights to use in computing the cost of capital, he examined the current balance sheet, presented in Figure 1. In their discussion, Al and his investment banker determined that the current mix in the capital structure was very close to optimal and that Berkshire Instruments should continue with it in the future. Of some concern was the appropriate cost to assign to each of the elements in the capital structure. Al Hansen requested that his administrative assistant provide data on what the cost to issue debt and preferred stock had been in the past. The information is provided in Figure 2. When Al got the data, he felt he was making real progress toward determining the cost of capital for the firm. However, his investment banker…

The Cost of Capital! Check My Work If a firm plans to issue new stock, flotation costs (investment bankers' fees) should not be ignored. There are two approaches to use to account for flotation costs. The first approach is to add the sum of flotation costs for the debt, preferred, and common stock and add them to the initial investment cost. Because the investment cost is increased, the project's expected rate of return is reduced so it may not meet the firm's hurdle rate for acceptance of the project. The second approach involves adjusting the cost of common equity as follows: Cost of equity from new stock =r, = Pe(1-F) +g The difference between the flotation-adjusted cost of equity and the cost of equity calculated without the flotation adjustment represents the flotation cost adjustment. Quantitative Problem: Barton Industries expects next year's annual dividend, D1, to be $2.40 and it expects dividends to grow at a constant rate g = 4.1%. The firm's current common stock price, Po,…

Suppose the management of a firm is trying to allocate liquid assets to two accounts, one of which is riskless but pays no interest, while the other offers a risky return. Assume the rate of return r on the second account is uniformly distributed over the range [-0.5, 0.5]. Let R denote the amount currently available for allocation to the two accounts, and S denote the amount invested in the risky asset. Suppose management would like to make the next period investment value as large as possible but subject to the condition that R + Sr not fall below 95% of the original value of R too often so that if the investment falls below 95% of its original value, it should not do so more than 25% of the time. Calculate the ratio of investment and the amount available, that is, a = R

A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? WACC: 6.75%           0     1   2   3   4   CFS -$1,025 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -$2,150 $765 $765 $765 $765

If managers of a company have inside information about the company’s future performances and such inside information is unknown to outsiders, then the company’s managers are most likely to use _____ to finance its project investment Group of answer choices a. the company’s retained earnings b. debt borrowing from banks c. share issuance to new investors d. there is no difference among the above three funding options