Microeconomics (13th Edition)
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780134744476
Author: Michael Parkin
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 21APA
To determine
Quantity of water purchased.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
GOSI shopping complex has 100 stores all rented to communication shops and concerned about security. The table below shows the total costs of hiring security guards to ensure safety of customers and protect storeowners from being vandalized. The table also shows the marginal benefit to each one of the shops.
Number of
Total cost
Marginal benefit for each shop
Marginal benefit for all shops
1
300
10
2
600
4
3
900
2
4
1200
1
Explain why a security guard a public good for the shop owners at GOSI?
If each shop owners act individually why zero guards will be hired
Fill in the missing information in the last column in the table.
a. Place point A at the equilibirum outcome. Place point B at the socially efficient outcome.
Market for cigarettes
10
Marginal social cost
В
Marginal private cost (supply)
8
A
7
Demand
4
3
1
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
Quantity of cigarettes (millions of packs)
CO
LO
Price ($)
The table below shows the total benefit for cleaning up the roadside for
the state.
Quantity of Pollution Cleanup
Total Beneft of Cleanup
dollars)
Multiple Choice
$200
$350
5475
$575
4
5
Each hour of cleaning up the roadside costs the city $100. How many
hours should the city spend on cleaning up the roadside?
Chapter 17 Solutions
Microeconomics (13th Edition)
Ch. 17.1 - Prob. 1RQCh. 17.1 - Prob. 2RQCh. 17.2 - Prob. 1RQCh. 17.2 - Prob. 2RQCh. 17.2 - Prob. 3RQCh. 17.2 - Prob. 4RQCh. 17.3 - Prob. 1RQCh. 17.3 - Prob. 2RQCh. 17.3 - Prob. 3RQCh. 17.4 - Prob. 1RQ
Ch. 17.4 - Prob. 2RQCh. 17.4 - Prob. 3RQCh. 17.4 - Prob. 4RQCh. 17 - Prob. 1SPACh. 17 - Prob. 2SPACh. 17 - Prob. 3SPACh. 17 - Prob. 4SPACh. 17 - Prob. 5SPACh. 17 - Prob. 6SPACh. 17 - Prob. 7SPACh. 17 - Prob. 8SPACh. 17 - Prob. 9SPACh. 17 - Prob. 10APACh. 17 - Prob. 11APACh. 17 - Prob. 12APACh. 17 - Prob. 13APACh. 17 - Prob. 14APACh. 17 - Prob. 15APACh. 17 - Prob. 16APACh. 17 - Prob. 17APACh. 17 - Prob. 18APACh. 17 - Prob. 19APACh. 17 - Prob. 20APACh. 17 - Prob. 21APACh. 17 - Prob. 22APACh. 17 - Prob. 23APACh. 17 - Prob. 24APACh. 17 - Prob. 25APACh. 17 - Prob. 26APACh. 17 - Prob. 27APACh. 17 - Prob. 28APACh. 17 - Prob. 29APACh. 17 - Prob. 30APA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The Junkbuyers Company travels from home to home, looking for opportunities to buy items that would otherwise end up with the garbage, but which the company can resell or recycle. Which will be larger, the private or the social benefits?arrow_forwardThe rows in Table 12.7 show three market-oriented tools for reducing pollution. The columns of the table show three complaints about command-and-control regulation. Fill in the table by stating briefly how each market-oriented tool addresses each of the three concerns.arrow_forwardFrom an economic perspective, is it sound policy to pursue a goal of zero pollution? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- In the Land of Purity, there is only one form of pollution, called gunk. Table 12.14 shows possible combinations of economic output and reduction of gunk, depending on what kinds of environmental regulations you choose. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the percentage reduction of gunk, and with the quantity of economic output on the vertical axis. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? In the choice between K and L, can you say which one is better and why? In the choice between K. and N, can you say which one is better, and why? If you had to guess, which choice would you think is move likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice L or M? Why?arrow_forward22. Both Wisconsin and Illinois border Lake Michigan. The lake is becoming polluted and both states are deciding whether or not to clean it. If Wisconsin decides to clean the fake it will cost 1200 and generate social benefits of 1500 however, Wisconsin will receive only 1100 of those social benefits while neighbor Illinois will receive the other 400. If Illinois cleans the lake, it will cost them 700 and generate social benefits of 900 â€" however, Illinois will receive only 600 of those benefits, Wisconsin will receive the remaining 300. If a state does not clean the lake, it experiences a cost of $0. If Wisconsin does not clean the lake and Michigan does then the payoffs will bearrow_forwardThis graph represents the tobacco industry. IPrice 16 14 Social Cost 12 10 Private Cost 8 6 4 Demand 200 500 650 Quantity a) Without any government intervention, what is the market determined price and quantity? b) What is the price of the externality? c) What is the socially optimal price and quantity? d) What should the government do (impose a tax or provide a subsidy) to internalize this externality? What is the amount of the the corrective tax/subsidy needed to be to move the outcome from the market equilibrium to the socially-optimal outcome?arrow_forward
- Refer to Figure. The graph represents a market in which 24 22 22 Price 18 16 81 Social cost (private cost and external cost) Supply (private cost) Demand (private valne) 120 160 Quantity a. Othere is no externality. b. Othere is a positive externality. c. Othere is a negative externality. d. The answer cannot be determined from inspection of the graph.arrow_forward. Both Wisconsin and Illinois border Lake Michigan. The lake is becoming polluted and both states are deciding whether or not to clean it. If Wisconsin decides to clean the lake it will cost 1200 and generate social benefits of 1500 – however, Wisconsin will receive only 1100 of those social benefits while neighbor Illinois will receive the other 400. If Illinois cleans the lake, it will cost them 700 and generate social benefits of 900 – however, Illinois will receive only 600 of those benefits, Wisconsin will receive the remaining 300. If a state does not clean the lake, it experiences a cost of $0. If both states clean the lake, the payoffs will be A. Wisconsin gains 100, Illinois gains 200B. Wisconsin gains 200, Illinois gains 300C. Wisconsin gains 200, Illinois loses 100D. Wisconsin gains 100, Illinois loses 100arrow_forwardParagraph Styles ILOS: A2, C2 Editing Voice 4. The paper industry has the demand and supply curves shown below: Price of paper Quantity demanded Quantity supplied 80 40 70 50 4 60 60 50 70 a. Suppose that this industry results in extreme externalities. What can be said about its optimal output? b. Draw the supply and demand curves for paper. Does the supply curve reflect the true social costs of producing the product? If not will a supply curve reflecting the true social costs lies above or below the supply curve you have drawn? c. What is the equilibrium price of paper? From the point of view of reflecting the true social costs, is this price the correct one, or too low or too high?arrow_forward
- using a diagram Explain the socially optimal quantity of a public goodarrow_forwardhe table below displays the private marginal benefit and the private marginal cost for Sam's Flower Farm. Quantity (acres) MC Private 100 200 300 400 500 $650 675 700 725 750 MB Private $675 675 675 675 675 m's Flower Farm produces wild flowers. Each acre produces $675 worth of flowers per month. Sam's farm also serves as a al attraction for tourists looking to view birds and butterflies increasing the revenues of local businesses by $25 per month. at is the socially efficient number of acres for Sam to plant if all costs and benefits are considered?arrow_forwardQUESTION 6 Marco runs an organic cafe in the middle of an industrial office zone. He has a lot of customers with only 6 allocated car parking spaces for them. Often, his customers use the car parks designated for clients at Eloise's architectural studio nearby. 1. Marco's cafe does not produce any negative externalities. 2. Marco's cafe creates a negative externality for Eloise's architectural studio. 3. To be socially efficient, Marco needs to pay for more car spaces near his cafe. Which of the above statements are true: O Only 1 is true. O Only 2 is true. O Both 1 and 2 are true. O Both 2 and 3 are true. O All three are true. O O Oarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning