Microeconomics (2nd Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780134492049
Author: Daron Acemoglu, David Laibson, John List
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 12Q
To determine
Mechanisms of the ultimatum game and its outcome based on the experimental evidence.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Evaluate the following statement. “We shouldn’t generalize from what people do in the ultimatum game because $10 is a trivial amount of money. When larger amounts of money are on the line, people will act differently.”
Two players play the Ultimatum Game, in which they are to split $20. A purely rational agent would only reject an offer of …
Give each option explanation too
Chapter 17 Solutions
Microeconomics (2nd Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In economics, we assume that choices are based on desired outcomes. This concept is known as:arrow_forwardTwo players play the Ultimatum Game, in which they are to split $20. A purely rational agent would only reject an offer of … Group of answer choices... -$20 -$19 -$1 -$0 -$10arrow_forwardWhat do you think of the ethics of using unconscious nudges to alter people’s behavior?arrow_forward
- Why might the multiple-play ultimatum game have a different result than the single-play ultimatum game? In the multiple-play ultimatum game, the first player generally offers less money to the second player than in the single-play ultimatum game. The multiple-play ultimatum game leads to a simpler equilibrium: the first player offers exactly half of the total sum to the second player. The multiple-play ultimatum game allows for players to send signals. Therefore, the receiver can punish a player who doesn’t share enough. The multiple-play ultimatum game generally results in less cooperation because both players fall into a back-and-forth pattern of trying to punish the other player.arrow_forwardWe learned that we can use choice between a gamble over someone's best and worst outcomes and getting an outcome of interest (like getting pizza) for certain as a way to assign numeric values to utility (on a scale of 0 to 1). Using this method, if you are indifferent between the following: A gamble that has a 0.3 chance of your best possible outcome (and no lower chance), and a 0.7 chance of your worst possible outcome. Getting pizza for certain. it means that your utility for getting pizza is:arrow_forwardIf equilibrium is compatible with both buyers’ and sellers’ intentions, how can it be undesirable?arrow_forward
- Peer pressure is an important influence on the behavior of youngsters. For instance, many preteens begin smoking because their friends pressure them into being “cool” by smoking. Using utility theory, how would you explain peer pressure? How would this compare with the explanations provided by behavioral economics and neuroeconomics?arrow_forwardWhy is option B correct?arrow_forwardJoab and his friends used to play a game where they put on a dog's electric fence collar and tried to stand over the electric fence line because, after careful consideration of the costs and benefits, they decided that the benefits of watching their friends get shocked outweighed the costs of being shocked themselves. According to the economic way of thinking, by playing this game, Joab and his friends were O not responding to the incentives they faced. making an irrational choice. making a rational choice. not fully considering the costs and benefits of their decision since this is obviously a mistake for anybody to do.arrow_forward
- What would behavioral economics say about each of the following statements? a. “Nobody is truly charitable-people donate money just to show off." b. “America has a ruthless capitalist system. Considerations of fairness are totally ignored." c. “Selfish people always get ahead. It's like nobody even notices!"arrow_forwardWhat does behavioral economics have to say about each of the following statements? a. “Nobody is truly charitable—they just give money to show off.” b. “America has a ruthless capitalist system. Considerations of fairness are totally ignored.” c. “Selfish people always get ahead. It’s like nobody even notices!”arrow_forwardI cannot figure out how to start this problem for my behavioral economics course. I would appreciate any help offered on how to start with parts a,b, and/or carrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning