Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics
18th Edition
ISBN: 9781260579611
Author: Douglas Lind; William Marchal; Samuel Wathen
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 16, Problem 16E
To determine
State the conditions that are necessary to use Kruskal–Wallis test instead of Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
suppose you and a friend each take different random samples of data pairs (x,y) from the same popuation. Assumethe samples are the same size. Based on your samples, you compute r=0.83. Based on her sample, your friend computes r=0.79. Is your friends value for r wrong?
We use the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between the Before and After with this data:
Questions
What is the sum of rank for before and after ?
If x, x2 ... Xn is a random sample from N (µ, o²) popula-
tion, find súfficient estimator for µ and ơ.
Chapter 16 Solutions
Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics
Ch. 16 - Prob. 1SRCh. 16 - Prob. 1ECh. 16 - Prob. 2ECh. 16 - Calorie Watchers has low-calorie breakfasts,...Ch. 16 - Prob. 4ECh. 16 - Prob. 2SRCh. 16 - Prob. 5ECh. 16 - Prob. 6ECh. 16 - Prob. 3SRCh. 16 - Prob. 7E
Ch. 16 - Prob. 8ECh. 16 - Prob. 9ECh. 16 - Prob. 10ECh. 16 - Prob. 4SRCh. 16 - Prob. 11ECh. 16 - Prob. 12ECh. 16 - Prob. 13ECh. 16 - Prob. 14ECh. 16 - Prob. 5SRCh. 16 - Prob. 15ECh. 16 - Prob. 16ECh. 16 - Prob. 17ECh. 16 - Prob. 18ECh. 16 - Prob. 19ECh. 16 - Prob. 20ECh. 16 - Prob. 6SRCh. 16 - Prob. 21ECh. 16 - Prob. 22ECh. 16 - Prob. 23ECh. 16 - Prob. 24ECh. 16 - Prob. 25CECh. 16 - Prob. 26CECh. 16 - Prob. 27CECh. 16 - Prob. 28CECh. 16 - Prob. 29CECh. 16 - Prob. 30CECh. 16 - Prob. 31CECh. 16 - Prob. 32CECh. 16 - Prob. 33CECh. 16 - Prob. 34CECh. 16 - Prob. 35CECh. 16 - Professor Bert Forman believes the students who...Ch. 16 - Prob. 37DACh. 16 - Prob. 38DACh. 16 - Prob. 39DACh. 16 - Prob. 1PCh. 16 - The manufacturer of childrens raincoats wants to...Ch. 16 - Prob. 3PCh. 16 - Prob. 4PCh. 16 - Prob. 1CCh. 16 - B. Thomas Testing Labs John Thomas, the owner of...Ch. 16 - Prob. 1.1PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.2PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.3PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.4PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.5PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.6PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.7PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.8PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.9PTCh. 16 - Prob. 1.10PTCh. 16 - Prob. 2.1PTCh. 16 - Prob. 2.2PTCh. 16 - Prob. 2.3PTCh. 16 - Prob. 2.4PT
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A medical researcher wishes to try three different techniques to lower blood pressure of patients with high blood pressure. The subjects are randomly selected and assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 is given medication, Group 2 is given an exercise program, and Group 3 is assigned a diet program. At the end of six weeks, the reduction in each subject's blood pressure is recorded. Use the Kruskal-Wallis test to find the critical value to test the claim that there is no difference in the distribution of the populations. Use a = 0.05. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 14 11 9. 15 8 15 12 7 18 11 16 7 12 11 3 7 ..... О А. 3.195 О В. 1.960 OC. 4.153 O D. 5.991arrow_forwardA researcher wants to test if the average performance of a new teaching method is different from the traditional teaching method in a sample of 25 students. The researcher used the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test and obtained a T-value of 43. What can be concluded from the test result?arrow_forwardI ran the code, it is included here as well as the output. The problem I am having is I do not understand the bolded part of this question. What type of remarks do you think they are looking for in the solution? If you think the normality assumptions are violated, you need to run some other kind of test, like a nonparametric test. One reasonable choice would be the Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Use R to run this test. Provide your code, output, and remarks in your solutions. wilcox.test(old, new, alternative = "two.sided", exact = F, correct = F) Wilcoxon rank-sum test data: x and y W = 217.5, p-value = 0.07908 alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0arrow_forward
- A single observation of a random variable having a Beta Distribution with a =2 and B unknown is used to test the nul hypothesis H,: B = Bo against H1: B - B1 (where B1 < Bo). Use the Neyman-Pearson Lemma to find the most powerful critical region.arrow_forwardConsider a random sample X1,...,Xn,... ∼ iid Beta(θ,1) for n > 2. Prove that the MLE and UMVUE are both consistent estimators for θI got MLE = n/-∑logXi and UMVUE = (n-1)/∑logXi. Need help in proving consistencyarrow_forwardThe built-in data set, UKgas, is a time series recording the quarterly UK gas consumption from 1960 to 1986. Using R we can convert this data into the vector x by the assignment x30 we can create a confidence interval for u using a normal critical value. If we want the confidence interval to be at the 94% level and we use a normal critical value, then what critical value should we use? i) Calculate a 94% confidence interval(using a normal critical value) for μ. j) How long is the 94% confidence interval just created in part i?arrow_forward
- In a survey of 490 drivers from the South, 409 wear a seat belt. In a survey of 340 drivers from the Northeast, 291 wear a seat belt. At α=0.05, can you support the claim that the proportion of drivers who wear seat belts is greater in the South than in the Northeast? Assume the random samples are independent. Complete parts (a) through (e). (a) Identify the claim and state H0 and Ha. The claim is "the proportion of drivers who wear seat belts in the South is greater than greater than the same as less than different than in the Northeast." Let p1 represent the population proportion for the South, and p2 represent the population proportion for the Northeast. State H0 and Ha. Choose the correct answer below. A. H0: p1≤p2 Ha: p1>p2 B. H0: p1≠p2 Ha: p1=p2 C. H0: p1≥p2 Ha: p1<p2 D. H0: p1=p2 Ha: p1≠p2 E. H0: p1>p2 Ha: p1≤p2 F. H0: p1<p2 Ha: p1≥p2 (b) Find the critical…arrow_forwardA golf club manufacturer claims that golfers can lower their scores by using the manufacturer's newly designed gold clubs. Eight golfers are randomly selected and each is asked to give his or her most recent score. After using the new clubs for one month, the golfers are asked again to give their most recent score. The scores for each golfer are given in the table below. Is there enough evidence to support the manufacturer's claim? Let d= (golf score after using the newly designed golf clubs) - (golf score before using the newly designed golf clubs). Use a significance level of a= 0.1 for the test. Assume that the scores are normally distributed for the population of golfers both before and after using the newly designed clubs. golfer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Score (old design ) 91 78 80 91 73 84 90 94 Score (new design) 87 81 79 88 77 80 85 89 Step 1 of 5: State the null and alternative hypothesis for…arrow_forwardA golf club manufacturer claims that golfers can lower their scores by using the manufacturer's newly designed golf clubs. Eight golfers are randomly selected and each is asked to give his or her most recent score. After using the new clubs for one month, the golfers are asked again to give their most recent score. The scores for each golfer are given in the table below. Is there enough evidence to support the manufacturer's claim? Let d=(golf score after using the newly designed golf clubs)−(golf score before using the newly designed golf clubs). Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Assume that the scores are normally distributed for the population of golfers both before and after using the newly designed clubs.arrow_forward
- A golf club manufacturer claims that golfers can lower their scores by using the manufacturer's newly designed golf clubs. Eight golfers are randomly selected and each is asked to give his or her most recent score. After using the new clubs for one month, the golfers are asked again to give their most recent score. The scores for each golfer are given in the table below. Is there enough evidence to support the manufacturer's claim? Let d=(golf score after using the newly designed golf clubs)−(golf score before using the newly designed golf clubs) d = (golf score after using the newly designed golf clubs) − (golf score before using the newly designed golf clubs) . Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Assume that the scores are normally distributed for the population of golfers both before and after using the newly designed clubs. Golfer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Score (old design)88 75 93 77 80 79 76 83 Score (new design)81 78 89 74 82 75 72 76…arrow_forwardA golf club manufacturer claims that golfers can lower their scores by using the manufacturer's newly designed golf clubs. Eight golfers are randomly selected and each is asked to give his or her most recent score. After using the new clubs for one month, the golfers are asked again to give their most recent score. The scores for each golfer are given in the table below. Is there enough evidence to support the manufacturer's claim? Let d=(golf score after using the newly designed golf clubs)−(golf score before using the newly designed golf clubs)d=(golf score after using the newly designed golf clubs)−(golf score before using the newly designed golf clubs). Use a significance level of α=0.01 for the test. Assume that the scores are normally distributed for the population of golfers both before and after using the newly designed clubs. Golfer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Score (old design) 94 89 87 88 86 90 86 94 Score (new design) 87 95 85 83 88 86 84 88 Step 1 of 5 :State the null…arrow_forwardA golf club manufacturer claims that golfers can lower their scores by using the manufacturer's newly designed golf clubs. Eight golfers are randomly selected and each is asked to give his or her most recent score. After using the new clubs for one month, the golfers are asked again to give their most recent score. The scores for each golfer are given in the table below. Is there enough evidence to support the manufacturer's claim? Let d=(golf score after using the newly designed golf clubs)−(golf score before using the newly designed golf clubs)d=(golf score after using the newly designed golf clubs)−(golf score before using the newly designed golf clubs). Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Assume that the scores are normally distributed for the population of golfers both before and after using the newly designed clubs. Golfer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Score (old design) 93 86 84 96 89 81 92 94 Score (new design) 91 90 80 92 91 77 89 87 Step 1 of 5:State the null and…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill
Calculus For The Life SciencesCalculusISBN:9780321964038Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.Publisher:Pearson Addison Wesley,
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic GeometryAlgebraISBN:9781133382119Author:SwokowskiPublisher:Cengage
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...
Algebra
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:McGraw Hill
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:Pearson Addison Wesley,
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Cengage