EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781305176386
Author: Snyder
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15.2, Problem 1.1MQ
To determine
To describe: The effort level the given scheme would induce from the workers.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
In a standard consumer optimization problem in microeconomics, a consumer purchases any pair of goods untilU1U2=p1p2(?), at an interior solution, where Ux is the marginal utility of good x for the consumer and px is the price of good x, where x={1,2}.
What is the corresponding optimality condition for a worker-consumer in his labour-leisure optimization problem and why is it just a variation on the standard optimality condition (?)?
Suppose you get two job offers when you graduate. First offer is in LA and pays $6000 permonth. The price of food in LA is $3 and price of housing is $5. The second offer is in SanFrancisco and pays $10000. Both food and housing is more expensive in SF at PF = 4 and PH = 6respectively. If your utility function is U (F, H) = F1/4 H
3/4 which job offer should you accept?
a manager's incentives are not perfectly aligned with the profit-maximising goals of a firm's owners, one plausible scenario is that they may have an incentive to maximise the firm's total revenue (if for example their income is proportional to revenue).
Explain why the revenue maximiser should always produce more than the profit maximiser.
Chapter 15 Solutions
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 1TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 2TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 1MQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 2.1MQCh. 15.2 - Prob. 1.1TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 2.1TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 1.2TTACh. 15.2 - Prob. 2.2TTACh. 15.3 - Prob. 1MQ
Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 2MQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 1MQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 15.4 - Prob. 2.1MQCh. 15.5 - Prob. 1TTACh. 15.5 - Prob. 2TTACh. 15.5 - Prob. 1MQCh. 15.5 - Prob. 2MQCh. 15 - Prob. 1RQCh. 15 - Prob. 2RQCh. 15 - Prob. 3RQCh. 15 - Prob. 4RQCh. 15 - Prob. 5RQCh. 15 - Prob. 6RQCh. 15 - Prob. 7RQCh. 15 - Prob. 8RQCh. 15 - Prob. 9RQCh. 15 - Prob. 10RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.1PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.2PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.3PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.4PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.5PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.6PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.7PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.8PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.9PCh. 15 - Prob. 15.10P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- This problem considers the decisions of a consumer whose preferences are given by u(C,1)=C+4 lnl, in which C' is the quantity of consumption and I is the quantity of leisure. The consumer faces two constraints. The time constraint is given by 1 + N³ = 1 with NS as the time spent working (or the labor supply). The main advantage of working is the wages consumers receive. Consumers take wages as given (outside of their control) and obtain wage income equal to wN³. The budget constraint is C wNsT, with π as real dividend income and T as the real = lump-sum taxes paid to government.arrow_forwardEvan knows his GPA would skyrocket if he could break his horrible habit of procrastinating. An example of a commitment device Evan could use would be: Question 46 options: a to allow himself one hour of leisure for every half-hour of studying he does each day. b to exercise before studying in order to be refreshed. c to pay a student to meet him each afternoon for 2 hours in the library to ensure he studies every day. d All of these are commitment devices.arrow_forwardSuppose you have two different job offers. The first offer is in LA and pays $8100 per month. The price of food (F) in LA is $2 and the price of housing (H) is $12. The second offer is in San Francisco and pays $9600. Both food and housing are more expensive in SF at PF = 3 and PH = 14 respectively. If your utility function is U (F, H) = F0.3 H0.7 which job offer should you accept please graph your reasioning.arrow_forward
- Nora's utility function is given by U = In(C) + In(L), where U is utility, C is consumption, and L is leisure. The total time Nora has is T = 1 and is a utility maximizer. Before the Covic pandemic, the wage rate is 10, and Nora has no non-labor income. When the pandemic hit and part of the economy was locked down, Nora's wage rate decreased to 8. However, the government provided income support by sending out a non-labor income of 5 to everyone, including Nora. Nora still has a total amount of time T = 1 for leisure and work during the pandemic. Which of the following statements is correct? O Before the pandemic, Nora's labor supply is 0.2. O Before the pandemic, Nora spent time equal to 0.2 O Before the pandemic, Nora's consumption was 9. O During the pandemic, Nora's labor supply is 0.5. leisure. O During the pandemic, Nora was better off for having a higher utility level. O During the pandemic, Nora's labor supply is unchanged becauses income effects were perfectly offset by the…arrow_forwardThis problem considers the decisions of a consumer whose preferences are given by u(C, 1) = C + y log 1, in which is the quantity of consumption and I is the quantity of leisure. The consumer faces two constraints. The time constraint is given by 1 + N = 1 with N³ as the time spent working (or the labor supply). Assume that 0 < x < 1. The main advantage of working is the wages consumers receive. Consumers take wages as given (outside of their control) and obtain wage income equal to w Nº. The budget constraint is C = wN+T-T, with as real dividend income and T as the real lump-sum taxes paid to government. Assume that an interior solution always exists in the optimal consumption-leisure choice.arrow_forwardSuppose that a CEO’s goal is to increase profitability and output from her company by bolstering its sales force and that it is known that profits as a function of output are π = 40q − 2q2(in millions of U.S. dollars). Graph the company’s profit function. Compare and contrast output and profits using the following compensation schemes based on the assumption that sales managers view output and profits as “goods”: (a) the company compensates sales managers solely based on output, (b) the company compensates sales managers solely based on profits, and (c) the comparrow_forward
- Suppose that a CEO’s goal is to increase profitability and output from her company by bolstering its sales force and that it is known that profits as a function of output are π = 40q − 2q2 (in millions of U.S. dollars). Graph the company’s profit function. Compare and contrast output and profits using the following compensation schemes based on the assumption that sales managers view output and profits as “goods”: (a) the company compensates sales managers solely based on output, (b) the company compensates sales managers solely based on profits, and (c) the company compensates sales managers based on a combination of output and profits.arrow_forwardLabor Market and Real Output: In the labor market, there is one representative worker and a representative firm. Worker supply hours of working (NS), and firm demand hours of work in order to produce output (Y). The production function that capture firm's production process is Y = f(N) = z√KN, where in the short run z=2 and K=100. Worker has a natural log utility function U(c, l) = In(c) + In(l). h=10, T T = 10. Please draw labor supply and labor demand in a graph and determine the equilibrium w*, N*, and Y*. If you cannot solve w*, N*, and Y*, you can just show where they are in the graph. (Note: MRS,c=and MPN: 2√N = Now, TFP (z) increases. What happen to the equilbirium outcomes (w*, N*, and Y*)? Please show it in an another graph. Are the changes the same as the example that we discussed in the class?arrow_forwardA firm wants to hire a worker. The worker can choose two effort levels: "work" or "shirk". The result of the workers effort is an output for the firm, which may take two levels: YL = 50 USD or YH = 100 USD (YL = low output, YH = high output). The actual output depends both workers effort and pure luck. Either level of output can occur if the worker works or shirks, but the lower output is more likely if the worker shirks. Below are the probabilities of the output levels as a function of the workers effort: shirk: probability of output 100 USD = 1/5shirk: probability of output 50 USD = 4/5work: probability of output 50 USD = 1/5work: probability of output 100 USD = 4/5The firm cannot observe the effort, hence it cannot specify the desired effort in the contract. It may only specify the wage as a function of the observed output.The workers expected utility is given by V = h krát odmocnina z (Wh C) + I krát odmocnina z (WI- C), where h, I and Wh and WI denote the probabilities and wages…arrow_forward
- Consider a competitive economy that has four different jobs that vary by their wage and risk level. The table below describes each of the four jobs.Job Risk ( r ) Wage ( w)A 1/5 $ 3B 1/4 $12C 1/3 $23D 1/2 $25All workers are equally productive, but workers vary in their preferences. Consider a worker who values his wage and the risk level according to the following utility function:u(w, r) = w + 1/r2Where does the worker choose to work? Suppose the government regulated the workplace and required all jobs to have a risk factor of 1/5 (that is, all jobs must become A jobs). What wage would the worker now need to earn in the A job to be equally happy following the regulation?arrow_forwardAssume, in producing one unit of a good X, an agent can exert either the good effort (G) or the bad effort (L), which cause production defects with probability 0.25 or 0.75 respectively. His utility function in effort e and wage w is U(w, e) = 100 (10/w) - c(e) where c(G) = 2 for the good effort and c(L) = () for the bad effort. Production defects are contractible and so can be included in the agent's contract, but effort is not contractible. Good X sells for $20 if there are no defects and $0 otherwise. The principal is risk-neutral and likes profit. Assume the agent has a reservation utility/outside option of U=0. Assume for this question that the principal wants to achieve the good effort and that effort is not contractible. Assume the principal offers an optimal 2 part contract {ws, Wf}, where we is paid if there are no defects and Wf is paid if there are any defects. What is the principal's expected profit under the optimal contract in this case? Answer to at most 2 decimal places…arrow_forwardlike to be perceived. This underlying psychological force is what often spurs a person to fill this perceived gap (i.e., between where I am and where I want to be) through a purchase. The underlying force driving the individual to fill the gap is also referred to as the individual's:arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education