Micro Economics For Today
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337613064
Author: Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher: Cengage,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 10SQ
To determine
The zero emission in automobiles.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Imagine a firm with a marginal abatement cost (MAC) function equal to:
MAC = 32 - 4E.
The government offers a $8 per-unit subsidy for abatement. In principle, the firm could ignore the subsidy and continue to emit as many emissions as it was in the absence of government intervention, but there is money to be made from cutting back its emissions. Compared to ignoring the subsidy, how much money could a cost-minimizing firm save or make by cutting back its emissions?
(Hint: remember that firms trade off the benefits of the subsidy with the costs of abatement when deciding how much to abate)
Answer:
MAC = 50 - 5E.
The government offers a $30 per-unit subsidy for abatement. In principle, the firm could ignore the subsidy and continue to emit as many emissions as it was in the absence of government intervention, but there is money to be made from cutting back its emissions. Compared to ignoring the subsidy, how much money could a cost-minimizing firm save or make by cutting back its emissions?
Answer the question
1. Identify an external benefit that could be generated by the presence of a shopping mall for a local residents.
Chapter 14 Solutions
Micro Economics For Today
Ch. 14.2 - Prob. 1.1GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 1.2GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 1.3GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 2.1GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 2.2GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 2.3GECh. 14.2 - Prob. 2.4GECh. 14 - Prob. 1SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 2SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 3SQP
Ch. 14 - Prob. 4SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 5SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 6SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 7SQPCh. 14 - California once proposed legislation that would...Ch. 14 - Prob. 9SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 10SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 11SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 12SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 13SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 14SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 15SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 16SQPCh. 14 - Prob. 1SQCh. 14 - Prob. 2SQCh. 14 - Prob. 3SQCh. 14 - Prob. 4SQCh. 14 - The perfectly competitive profit-maximizing firm...Ch. 14 - Prob. 6SQCh. 14 - Prob. 7SQCh. 14 - Prob. 8SQCh. 14 - Prob. 9SQCh. 14 - Prob. 10SQCh. 14 - Prob. 11SQCh. 14 - Prob. 12SQCh. 14 - Prob. 13SQCh. 14 - Prob. 14SQCh. 14 - Prob. 15SQCh. 14 - Prob. 16SQCh. 14 - Prob. 17SQCh. 14 - Prob. 18SQCh. 14 - Prob. 19SQCh. 14 - Prob. 20SQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- "Many towns and cities on the northeast and west coasts have passed bans on smoking in restaurants and bars. What is the economic rationale behind these bans? Should there be similar rationales for banning smoking in automobiles? Apartment buildings? Houses?"arrow_forwardImagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $6. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $1 to $4, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $. Select one: a. $7.50. O b. $12. C. $3. O d. $4.5.arrow_forwardHow do taxes, pollution charges, and cap-and-trade work to reduce emissions? When a cap-and-trade is implemented _______.arrow_forward
- Which of the following is most likely to be the best method of reducing the usage of personal cars by the public? a) Decrease of road taxes and fines. b) Building more road and infrastructures. c) Increasing the speed limit on the highways. d) Increasing the parking fees and other service charges.arrow_forwardPlease explain each solution step by step.Consider an economy with 2 plants, A and B, whose operations produce emissions. The graphs show the marginal benefits (MB) to each plant from its emissions on the y-axis (in Euros) and the quantity of emissions in tons on the x-axis. The graph on the left represents the case when the government imposes a limit on emissions. The graph on the right represents the case when the government imposes a tax on emissions.a) let’s say the government limits the emissions of each plant at 4 tons. The marginal benefit of 4 tons of emissions to plant A is 2 euros. Referring to the graph on left, what is the welfare loss to plant A from the limit imposed by the government? (euros)b) now let’s say the government sets a unit tax on emissions of 6 euros. Under this tax, plant B will produce 6 tons of emissions and plant A will produce 2 tons of emissions. Referring to the graph on the right, what is the total net welfare from the imposition of the tax?…arrow_forwardPlease explain each solution step by step. Consider an economy with 2 plants, A and B, whose operations produce emissions. The graphs show the marginal benefits (MB) to each plant from its emissions on the y-axis (in Euros) and the quantity of emissions in tons on the x-axis. The graph on the left represents the case when the government imposes a limit on emissions. The graph on the right represents the case when the government imposes a tax on emissions. a) let's say the government limits the emissions of each plant at 4 tons. The marginal benefit of 4 tons of emissions to plant A is 2 euros. Referring to the graph on left, what is the welfare loss to plant A from the limit imposed by the government? (euros) b) now let's say the government sets a unit tax on emissions of 6 euros. Under this tax, plant B will produce 6 tons of emissions and plant A will produce 2 tons of emissions. Referring to the graph on the right, what is the total net welfare from the imposition of the tax?…arrow_forward
- assume you are an average american driver. using the 2014 emission totals, how many pounds of nox emission are you responsible for creating? how many pounds would you prevent if you were to reduce by half of the vehicle miles you travel? what percentage of your total nox emissions would that be?arrow_forwardImagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. With a tax on emissions of $4, the benefits of adopting the new technologies equal:Select one:a. $9.b. $4.50.c. $8.d. $4.arrow_forwardIf the government wants to reduce the burning of fossil fuels, it should impose a tax onarrow_forward
- Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $3, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $____.Select one:a. $8.b. $4.50.c. $5.d. $2.50.arrow_forwardPlease solve part d,e and f!!! Three roommates, Jim, Saleem, and Ritesh, are thinking about buying a new speaker system for their apartment. The speaker system would be a public good if they buy them, and the total cost would be $300 which would be shared equally among the three. Jim values it at $80, Saleem values it at $140, and Ritesh values it at $70. If the speakers are purchased each person gets a payoff equal to their net valuation (valuation minus cost share); if they are not purchased each gets zero payoff. a)Is it socially efficient that they buy the speaker system? With reference to the definition of a public good, why or why not? The roommates decide that they will write down their net valuations, and if these reports sum to more than zero, they will buy the TV (sharing the cost equally), or else they will not. b) If all were to report their true valuations, what payoff would each agent earn? c) Show that if Jim and Ritesh submit their true net valuation, then Saleem does…arrow_forwardWith Diagram, show how external effects can change supply and demand in electricity generation.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning