Concept explainers
The article “Optimization of Surface Roughness in Drilling Using Vegetable-Based Cutting Oils Developed from Sunflower Oil” (Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, 2011: 271–276) gave the following data on x1 = spindle speed (rpm), x2 = feed rate (mm/rev), x3 = drilling depth (mm), and y 5 surface roughness (μm) when a semisynthetic cutting fluid was used:
x1 | x2 | x3 | y | e* |
320 | .10 | 15 | 2.27 | −1.32 |
320 | .12 | 20 | 4.14 | 1.08 |
320 | .14 | 25 | 4.69 | 0.26 |
420 | .10 | 20 | 1.92 | −0.40 |
420 | .12 | 25 | 2.63 | −0.79 |
420 | .14 | 15 | 4.34 | 0.99 |
520 | .10 | 25 | 2.03 | 1.64 |
520 | .12 | 15 | 2.34 | 0.03 |
520 | .14 | 20 | 2.67 | −1.52 |
a. Here is partial Minitab output from fitting the model with x1, x2, and x3 as predictors (authors of the cited article used Minitab for this purpose):
Predictor Constant | Coef | SE Coef | T | P |
0 . 099 | 1. 871 | 0 . 05 | 0 . 960 | |
x1 | −0.006767 | 0.002231 | −3 . 03 | 0 . 029 |
x2 | 45 . 67 | 11.16 | 4 . 09 | 0 . 009 |
X3 | 0 . 01333 | 0 . 04463 | 0 .30 | 0 . 777 |
S = 0.546589 R-Sq = 83.9% R-Sq (adj ) = 74.2 | 2% |
Does drilling depth provide useful information about roughness given that spindle speed and feed rate remain in the model?
b. Here is Minitab output from fitting the model with just x1 and x2 as predictors (the cited article made no mention of this model):
Predictor Constant | Coef | SE Coef | T | P |
0.365 | 1.514 | 0 .24 | 0 . 817 | |
x1 | −0 . 006767 | 0.002055 | −3 .29 | 0 . 017 |
x2 | 45.67 | 10 .28 | 4 .44 | 0 . 004 |
S = 0. 503400 R-Sq =83.6% R-Sq(adj) =78.1% |
Carry out a test of model utility using α = .05.
c. Calculate and interpret a 95% CI for the population regression coefficient on x1.
d. The estimated standard deviation of the predicted Y when x1 = 400 and x2 = .125 is .180. Calculate a 95% CI for true average roughness under these circumstances.
e. The e* values that appear along with the data are from the regression of (b). Investigate model adequacy.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 13 Solutions
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences
- Wrinkle recovery angle and tensile strength are the two most important characteristics for evaluating the performance of crosslinked cotton fabric. An increase in the degree of crosslinking, as determined by ester carboxyl band absorbance, improves the wrinkle resistance of the fabric (at the expense of reducing mechanical strength). The accompanying data on x = absorbance and y = wrinkle resistance angle was read from a graph in the paper "Predicting the Performance of Durable Press Finished Cotton Fabric with Infrared Spectroscopy".t x 0.115 0.126 0.183 0.246 0.282 0.344 0.355 0.452 0.491 0.554 0.651 y 334 342 355 363 365 372 381 400 392 412 420 Here is regression output from Minitab: Predictor Constant absorb S = 3.60498 Coef 321.878 156.711 SOURCE Regression Residual Error Total R-Sq= 98.5% DF SE Coef 2.483 6.464 1 9 10 SS 7639.0 117.0 7756..0 T 129.64 24.24 P 0.000 0.000. R-Sq (adj) 98.3% MS 7639.0 13.0 F 587.81 (a) Does the simple linear regression model appear to be appropriate?…arrow_forwardWrinkle recovery angle and tensile strength are the two most important characteristics for evaluating the performance of crosslinked cotton fabric. An increase in the degree of crosslinking, as determined by ester carboxyl band absorbance, improves the wrinkle resistance of the fabric (at the expense of reducing mechanical strength). The accompanying data on x = absorbance and y = wrinkle resistance angle was read from a graph in the paper "Predicting the Performance of Durable Press Finished Cotton Fabric with Infrared Spectroscopy".† x 0.115 0.126 0.183 0.246 0.282 0.344 0.355 0.452 0.491 0.554 0.651 y 334 342 355 363 365 372 381 392 400 412 420 Here is regression output from Minitab: Predictor Constant absorb S = 3.60498 Coef 321.878 156.711 SOURCE Regression Residual Error Total SE Coef 2.483 6.464 R-Sq = 98.5% DF 1 9 10 SS 7639.0 117.0 7756.0 T 129.64 24.24 0.000 0.000 R-Sq (adj) = 98.3% MS 7639.0 13.0 F P 587.81 (a) Does the simple linear regression model appear to be…arrow_forwardWrinkle recovery angle and tensile strength are the two most important characteristics for evaluating the performance of crosslinked cotton fabric. An increase in the degree of crosslinking, as determined by ester carboxyl band absorbance, improves the wrinkle resistance of the fabric (at the expense of reducing mechanical strength). The accompanying data on x = absorbance and y = wrinkle resistance angle was read from a graph in the paper "Predicting the Performance of Durable Press Finished Cotton Fabric with Infrared Spectroscopy".t 半 0.115 0.126 0.183 0.246 0.282 0.344 0.355 0.452 0.491 0.554 0.651 334 342 355 363 365 372 381 392 400 412 420 Here is regression output from Minitab: Predictor Coef SE Coef P Constant 321.878 2.483 129.64 0.000 absorb 156.711 6.464 24.24 0.000 S = 3.60498 R-Sq = 98.5% R-Są (adj) - 98.3% SOURCE DF MS F P Regression 1 7639.0 7639.0 587.81 0.000 Residual Error 9 117.0 13.0 Total 10 7756.0 (a) Does the simple linear regression model appear to be…arrow_forward
- The article "Modeling Resilient Modulus and Temperature Correction for Saudi Roads" (H. Wahhab, I. Asi, and R. Ramadhan, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2001:298– 305) describes a study designed to predict the resilient modulus of pavement from physical properties. The following table presents data for the resilient modulus at 40°Cin10® kPa (y), the surface area of the aggregate in m²/kg (x1), and the softening point of the asphalt in °C (х). y X1 X2 1.48 5.77 60.5 1.70 7.45 74.2 2.03 8.14 67.6 2.86 8.73 70.0 2.43 7.12 64.6 3.06 6.89 65.3 2.44 8.64 66.2 1.29 6.58 64.1 3.53 9.10 68.6 1.04 8.06 58.8 1.88 5.93 63.2 1.90 8.17 62.1 1.76 9.84 68.9 2.82 7.17 72.2 1.00 7.78 54.1 The full quadratic model is y = + P,x, + PzX, + Pz*jXz + Pxx¡ + Bzx; + €. Which submodel of this full model do you believe is most appropriate? Justify your answer by fitting two or more models and comparing the results.arrow_forwardThe article “Wastewater Treatment Sludge as a Raw Material for the Production of Bacillus thuringiensis Based Biopesticides” (M. Tirado Montiel, R. Tyagi, and J. Valero, Water Research, 2001:3807–3816) presents measurements of total solids, in g/L, for seven sludge specimens. The results (rounded to the nearest gram) are 20, 5, 25, 43, 24, 21, and 32. Assume the distribution of total solids is approximately symmetric. a) Can you conclude that the mean concentration of total solids is greater than 14 g/L? Compute the appropriate test statistic and find the P-value. b) Can you conclude that the mean concentration of total solids is less than 30 g/L? Compute the appropriate test statistic and find the P-value. c) An environmental engineer claims that the mean concentration of total solids is equal to 18 g/L. Can you conclude that the claim is false?arrow_forwardNeed help with (c) and (d) Mist (airborne droplets or aerosols) is generated when metal-removing fluids are used in machining operations to cool and lubricate the tool and workpiece. Mist generation is a concern to OSHA, which has recently lowered substantially the workplace standard. An article gave the accompanying data on x = fluid-flow velocity for a 5% soluble oil (cm/sec) and y = the extent of mist droplets having diameters smaller than 10 µm (mg/m3): x 88 177 182 354 369 442 970 y 0.39 0.60 0.50 0.66 0.61 0.69 0.92 (a) The investigators performed a simple linear regression analysis to relate the two variables. Does a scatter plot of the data support this strategy? (b) What proportion of observed variation in mist can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between velocity and mist? (Round your answer to three decimal places.) (c) The investigators were particularly interested in the impact on mist of increasing velocity from 100 to 1000 (a…arrow_forward
- Please answer all questions and show workarrow_forward17.7 Butterfly wings. Researchers studied the morphological attributes of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus), a species that undertakes large seasonal migrations over North America. They measured the forewing weight (in milligrams, mg) of a sample of 92 monarch butterflies, all of which had been reared in captivity in identical conditions.° Figure 17.4 shows the output from the statistical software JMP. (The data are also available in the Large.Butterfly the data file if you wish to practice working with your own software.) Estimate with 95% confidence the mean forewing weight of monarch butterflies reared in captivity. Follow the four- step process as illustrated in Example 17.2. 4 STEP そMP FWweight 30 25 20 15 10 11 12 13 14 15 8 9 10 Summary Statistics Mean 11.795652 Std Dev 1.1759413 Std Err Mean 0.1226004 Upper 95% Mean Lower 95% Mean 1 FIGURE 17.4 Software output (JMP) for the forewing weight of monarch 12.039183 11.552122 92 N. butterflies. Countarrow_forwardMist (airborne droplets or aerosols) is generated when metal- removing fluids are used in machining operations to cool and lubricate the tool and workpiece. Mist generation is a concern to OSHA, which has recently lowered substantially the workplace standard. The article "Variables Affecting Mist Generaton from Metal Removal Fluids" (Lubrication Engr., 2002: 10-17) gave the accompanying data on x = fluid-flow velocity for a 5% soluble oil (cm/sec) and y = the extent of mist droplets having diameters smaller than 10 μm (mg/m³): x y 89 177 189 354 362 442 965 .40 .60 .48 .66 .61 .69 .99 a. The investigators performed a simple linear regres- sion analysis to relate the two variables. Does a scat- terplot of the data support this strategy? b. What proportion of observed variation in mist can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between velocity and mist? c. The investigators were particularly interested in the impact on mist of increasing velocity from 100 to 1000 (a…arrow_forward
- In an experiment to determine factors related to weld toughness, the Charpy V-notch impact toughness in ft - 1b (v) was measured for 22 welds at 0°Č, along with the lateral expansion at the notch in % (x,), and the brittle fracture surface in % (x2). The data are presented in the following table. X1 X2 y 32 20.0 28 39 23.0 28 20 12.8 32 21 16.0 29 25 10.2 31 20 11.6 28 32 17.6 25 29 17.8 28 27 16.0 29 43 26.2 27 22 9.6 32 22 15.2 32 18 8.8 43 32 20.4 24 22 12.2 36 25 14.6 36 25 10.4 29 20 11.6 30 20 12.6 31 24 16.2 36 18 9.2 34 28 16.8 30 a. Fit the model y = Bo + B1 X1 + ɛ. For each coefficient, test the null hypothesis that it is equal to 0. b. Fit the model y = Bo + B, xz + ɛ. For each coefficient, test the null hypothesis that it is equal to 0. c. Fit the model y = Bo + B1 X1 + Bzx2 + ɛ. For each coefficient, test the null hypothesis that it is equal to 0. d. Which of the models in parts (a) through (c) is the best of the three? Why do you think %3D + E. so?arrow_forward11 2.4 please help with 4th partarrow_forwardI need help with part (c) only, I need t statistic and p value. Mist (airborne droplets or aerosols) is generated when metal-removing fluids are used in machining operations to cool and lubricate the tool and workpiece. Mist generation is a concern to OSHA, which has recently lowered substantially the workplace standard. An article gave the accompanying data on x = fluid-flow velocity for a 5% soluble oil (cm/sec) and y = the extent of mist droplets having diameters smaller than 10 µm (mg/m3): x 88 177 182 354 369 442 970 y 0.39 0.60 0.50 0.66 0.61 0.69 0.92 (a) The investigators performed a simple linear regression analysis to relate the two variables. Does a scatter plot of the data support this strategy? Yes, a scatter plot shows a reasonable linear relationship.No, a scatter plot does not show a reasonable linear relationship. (b) What proportion of observed variation in mist can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between velocity and…arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman