Aplia, 1 term Printed Access Card for Gravetter/Wallnau's Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 8th
Aplia, 1 term Printed Access Card for Gravetter/Wallnau's Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 8th
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781285079707
Author: Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher: Cengage Learning
bartleby

Videos

Textbook Question
Book Icon
Chapter 13, Problem 25P

The following data are from a two-factor study examining the effects of two treatment conditions on males and females.

a.    Use an ANOVA with α = .05 for all tests to evaluate the significance of the main effects and the interaction.

b. Compute η2 to measure the size of the effect for each main effect and the interaction.

  Factor B: Treatment

  B1 B2 B3  
Male 3 1 10  
  1 4 10  
  1 8 14  
  6 6 7

TROW1 =90

ROWI

  4 6 9  
  M= 3 M = 5 M = 10  
  T = 15 T=25 T= 50  
  SS = 18 SS =28 SS = 26 N = 30
Factor A: 0 2 1 G = 120
Gender 2 7 I ΣX2 = 860
  0 2 1  
  0 2 6 TROW2 = 30
Female 3 2 1  
  M = 1 M = 3 M = 2  
  T =5 T =15 T =10  
  SS =8 SS =20 SS = 20  

TCO4.1 = 20 TCO4.2 = 40 TCO4.3 = 60

a.

Expert Solution
Check Mark
To determine
Using an ANOVA with α=0.05 for all tests to evaluate the significance of the main effects and the interaction.

Answer to Problem 25P

For factor A treatment has significant effect means there is difference in performance of male and female. For factor B treatment has significant effect means there is difference in treatment with B1,B2,B3. The interaction indicates that the differences among treatment as not the same for male as they one for females.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The following data are given in the question:

 Factor B
    B1 B2 B3  
Factor AMale 3 1 10 Trow1=90
1 4 10
1 8 14
6 6 7
4 6 9
M=3T=15SS=18 M=5T=25SS=28 M=10T=50SS=26 N=30
Female 0 2 1

 

 

G=120X2=860Trow2=30

2 7 1
0 2 1
0 2 6
3 2 1
M=1T=5SS=8 M=3T=15SS=20 M=2T=10SS=20
Total = 20 Total = 40 Total = 60  

Calculation:

Total variability:

Total sum of squareis calculated as:

SStotal=X2G2N=860(120)230=380

Total degree of freedomis calculated as:

dftotal=N1=301=29

Within treatment:

Sum of square within treatment is calculated as:

SSwithintreatments=SSeachtreatments=18+28+26+8+20+20=120

Degree of freedom within treatmentis calculated as:

dfwithintreatments=(4+4+4)+(4+4+4)=24

Between treatment variability:

Sum of square between treatmentsis calculated as:

SSbetweentreatment=SStotalSSwithin=380120=260

Degree of freedom between treatments is calculated as:

dfbetweentreatment=number of cells 1=61=5

For factor A, the row totals are 90 and 30, and each total was obtained by adding nothing.

SSA=Trow2nrowG2N=90215+30215120×12030=540+60480=120

Degree of freedom for factor Ais calculated as:

dfA=number of row1=21=1

For factor B, sum of square is calculated as:

SSB=Tcol2ncolG2N=20210+40210+60210(120)230=80

Degree of freedom for factor B is calculated as:

dfB=number of columns1=31=2

Interaction between factors A and B denoted as A×B, sum of square for interaction between factors is calculated as:

SSA×B=SSbetweentreatmentSSASSB=26012080=60

Degree of freedom for interaction between factors is calculated as:

dfA×B=dfbetweentreatmentdfAdfB=512=2

Two factor ANOVA consists of three separate hypothesis test with 3 separate F-ratios.

MSwithintreatment=SSwithintreatmentdfwithintreatment=12024=5

This value is same for all three F-ratios.

The numerator of the 3 F-ratios factor A, Factor B, A×B interaction. Variances for factor A is calculated as:

MSA=SSAdfA=1201=120

Variances for factor Bis calculated as:

MSB=SSBdfB=802=40

Variance for A×B interaction is calculated as:

MSA×B=SSA×BdfA×B=602=30

Now F statistic for factor A is calculated as:

FA=MSAMSwithintreatment=1205=24

F statistic for factor B is calculated as:

FB=MSBMSwithintreatment=405=8

F statistic for A×B interaction is calculated as:

FA×B=MSA×BMSwithintreatment=305=6

Decision rule:

If the absolute value of the F-ratio is greater than the table value then there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

F-ratio for factor A has df(1,24) with α=0.05 critical value F is 4.26.

Thus, the absolute F-ratio forfactor A is 24 which is greater than 4.26. Thus, there is enough evidence to reject that there is no mean difference for factor A. Hence, factor A  has a significant effect.

Thus, the absolute F-ratio for factor B is * which is greater than 3.40. Thus, there is enough evidence to reject that there is no mean difference for factor A. Hence, factor B has a significant effect.

Thus, the absolute F-ratio forinteraction effect is 6 which is greater than 3.40. Thus, there is enough evidence to reject that there is no mean difference for factor A. Hence, factor B has a significant effect. For these data, treatment of interaction has significant effect.

b.

Expert Solution
Check Mark
To determine

Compute: The value of η2 to measure the size of effect for each main effect and the interaction.

Answer to Problem 25P

The value of η2 to measure the size of effect for each main effect and the interaction is 0.5 for factor A, 0.4 for factor B and 0.33 for interaction between factors A and B.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The following data are given in the question:

 Factor B
    B1 B2 B3  
Factor AMale 3 1 10 Trow1=90
1 4 10
1 8 14
6 6 7
4 6 9
M=3T=15SS=18 M=5T=25SS=28 M=10T=50SS=26 N=30
Female 0 2 1

 

 

G=120X2=860Trow2=30

2 7 1
0 2 1
0 2 6
3 2 1
M=1T=5SS=8 M=3T=15SS=20 M=2T=10SS=20
Total = 20 Total = 40 Total = 60  

Calculation:

The size of the effect for factor A is calculated as:

η2=SSASSA+SSwithintreatment

Now substitute the values calculated in part A then:

η2=SSASSA+SSwithintreatment=120120+120=120240=0.5

The size of the effect for factor B is calculated as:

η2=SSBSSB+SSwithintreatment

Now substitute the values calculated in part A then:

η2=SSBSSB+SSwithintreatment=8080+120=80200=0.4

The size of the effect for interaction A×B is calculated as:

η2=SSA×BSSA×B+SSwithintreatment

Now substitute the values calculated in part A then:

η2=SSA×BSSA×B+SSwithintreatment=6060+120=60180=0.33

Conclusion:

The value of η2 to measure the size of effect for each main effect and the interaction is 0.5 for factor A, 0.4 for factor B and 0.33 for interaction between factors A and B.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Compare the two separate scatterplots. In particular, how do the associtation compare between women with pets vs. women without pets? Does one group have more variation in systolic blood pressure than the other? If so, for which group? Does systolic blood pressure seem higher for common ages between the two groups? If so, for which group?
An amusement park studied methods for decreasing the waiting time (minutes) for rides by loading and unloading riders more efficiently. Two alternative loading/unloading methods have been proposed. To account for pot differences due to the type of ride and the possible interaction between the method of loading and unloading and the type of ride, a factorial experiment was designed. Use the following data to test for any significant effect loading and unloading method, the type of ride, and interaction. Use a = 0.05. Factor A is method of loading and unloading; Factor B is the type of ride. Roller Coaster Method 1 48 50 Method 2 48 50 Type of Ride Screaming Demon Long Flume 51 45 43 41 49 46 42 Set up the ANOVA table (to whole number, but p-value to 4 decimals and F value to 2 decimal, if necessary). Do not round intermediate calculations. Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Square Factor A F p-value × Factor B Interaction Error * * * * Total The p-value for…
The effects of developer strength (factor A) and development time (factor B) on the density of photographic plate film were being studied. Two strengths and two development times were used, and four replicates in each of the four cells were evaluated. The results (with larger being best) are shown in the following table: At the 0.05 level of significance, a. is there an interaction between developer strength and development time? b. is there an effect due to developer strength? c. is there an effect due to development time?

Chapter 13 Solutions

Aplia, 1 term Printed Access Card for Gravetter/Wallnau's Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 8th

Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Statistics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
  • Text book image
    Calculus For The Life Sciences
    Calculus
    ISBN:9780321964038
    Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
    Publisher:Pearson Addison Wesley,
Text book image
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:Pearson Addison Wesley,
Introduction to experimental design and analysis of variance (ANOVA); Author: Dr. Bharatendra Rai;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSFo1MwLoxU;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY