EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781305176386
Author: Snyder
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 7RQ
To determine
The first firm which moves forward to possess the advantage.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose Grady, Grace, and George own the 3 wrecker services in the small town of Collisionville. Each currently charges $350 for a standard towing job within town. Competition is heating up and each wants to grow their market share. Use this information to answer the following:
What does the Law of Demand say that Grace can do to grow her market share?
Suppose that the Kinked Demand Curve Theory describes this market well. How would considering this theory impact Grace’s decision on part 1?
Verizon can be viewed as a first mover. Now suppose both ATT and Verizon are considering whether and how to enter a potential market.
Market demand is given by the inverse demand function p= 900−q1−q2, where p is the market price margin, q1 is the quantity sold by Verizon and q2 is the quantity sold by ATT.
To enter the market, a retailer must build a store. Two types of stores can be built: Small and Large. The Small store requires an investment of $50,000, and it allows the retailer to sell as many as 100 units of the goods at zero marginal cost. Alternatively, they can pay $175,000 to construct a Large store that will allow it to sell any number of units at zero marginal cost.
Assume Verizon enters and builds a Large store (i.e. chooses to build a Large store L1 at the first stage.)
Calculate Verizon's profit for the following cases:
a.) ATT chooses not to enter N at the second stage after viewing Verizon's choice.
b.) ATT chooses to build a Small store S at the second stage…
Verizon can be viewed as a first mover. Now suppose both ATT and Verizon are considering whether and how to enter a potential market.
Market demand is given by the inverse demand function p= 900−q1−q2, where p is the market price margin, q1 is the quantity sold by Verizon and q2 is the quantity sold by ATT.
To enter the market, a retailer must build a store. Two types of stores can be built: Small and Large. The Small store requires an investment of $50,000, and it allows the retailer to sell as many as 100 units of the goods at zero marginal cost. Alternatively, they can pay $175,000 to construct a Large store that will allow it to sell any number of units at zero marginal cost.
Assume Verizon stays out of the potential market (i.e. chooses not to enter N1 at the first stage, q1= 0).
Calculate Verizon's profit for the following cases:
a.) ATT chooses not to enter N at the second stage after viewing Verizon's choice.
b.) ATT chooses to build a Small store S at the second stage…
Chapter 12 Solutions
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
Ch. 12.2 - Prob. 1TTACh. 12.2 - Prob. 2TTACh. 12.2 - Prob. 1MQCh. 12.2 - Prob. 2MQCh. 12.2 - Prob. 1.1TTACh. 12.2 - Prob. 2.1TTACh. 12.2 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 12.3 - Prob. 1MQCh. 12.3 - Prob. 2MQCh. 12.3 - Prob. 1TTA
Ch. 12.3 - Prob. 2TTACh. 12.3 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 12.3 - Prob. 2.1MQCh. 12.3 - Prob. 1.1TTACh. 12.3 - Prob. 2.1TTACh. 12.4 - Prob. 1TTACh. 12.4 - Prob. 2TTACh. 12.5 - Prob. 1MQCh. 12.5 - Prob. 2MQCh. 12.5 - Prob. 1TTACh. 12.5 - Prob. 2TTACh. 12.6 - Prob. 1MQCh. 12.6 - Prob. 2MQCh. 12 - Prob. 1RQCh. 12 - Prob. 2RQCh. 12 - Prob. 3RQCh. 12 - Prob. 4RQCh. 12 - Prob. 5RQCh. 12 - Prob. 6RQCh. 12 - Prob. 7RQCh. 12 - Prob. 8RQCh. 12 - Prob. 9RQCh. 12 - Prob. 10RQCh. 12 - Prob. 12.1PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.2PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.3PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.4PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.5PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.6PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.7PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.8PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.9PCh. 12 - Prob. 12.10P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose we have two identical firms A and B, selling identical products. They are the only firms in the market and compete by choosing quantities at the same time. The Market demand curve is given by P=477-Q. The only cost is a constant marginal cost of $16. Suppose Firm A produces a quantity of 66 and Firm B produces a quantity of 49. If Firm A decides to increase its quantity by 1 unit while Firm B continues to produce the same 49 units, what is the Marginal Revenue for Firm A from this extra unit? Enter a number only, no $ sign. Don't forget to include the negative sign if revenue decreases.arrow_forwardTwo firms, Incumbent & Entrant, can produce the same good. The market demand for the good is given by P = 180 – Q, where P is the market price and Q is the market quantity demanded. The firms must pay w = 45 per unit of output for labour and r = 45 per unit of output for capital (one unit of capital is used per unit of output), but Incumbent may choose capacity KI units of capital before Entrant decides whether to enter the market. Suppose firms each have fixed costs FI =600, FE=500. Incumbent chooses (as a Stackelberg leader) capacity Kl equal to the monopoly profit- maximizing quantity. When you answer the following questions, show your work. a. Would Incumbent be able to prevent entry by choosing capacity Kl equal to the monopoly profit- maximizing quantity? Explain. b. What is the Incumbent's equilibrium choice of capacity KI in this Dixit game? c. Does the Incumbent's choice of capacity KI in part (b) qualify as predatory conduct (here, limit output)? Explain. %3|arrow_forwardTwo firms, Incumbent & Entrant, can produce the same good. The market demand for the good is given by P = 180 – Q, where P is the market price and Q is the market quantity demanded. The firms must pay w = 45 per unit of output for labour and r = 45 per unit of output for capital (one unit of capital is used per unit of output), but Incumbent may choose capacity KI units of capital before Entrant decides whether to enter the market. Suppose firms each have fixed costs FI =600, FE=500. Incumbent chooses (as a Stackelberg leader) capacity KI equal to the monopoly profit- maximizing quantity. When you answer the following questions, show your work. a. Would Incumbent be able to prevent entry by choosing capacity KI equal to the monopoly profit-maximizing quantity? Explain. b. What is the Incumbent’s equilibrium choice of capacity KI in this Dixit game? c. Does the Incumbent’s choice of capacity KI in part (b) qualify as predatory conduct (here, limit output)? Explain.arrow_forward
- We typically focus on firms from well-developed economies entering markets of less developed economies. Do firms from less developed economies have a chance of success if they enter developed markets, such as the United States? What competitive advantage could a firm from a less developed economy rely on in entering developed markets? What would likely be the best entry mode?arrow_forwardThe auto industry in the U.S. has long been dominated by the Big Three carmakers: Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. The auto industry in China, on the other hand, has more than 170 carmakers. Automakers in the U.S. have some monopoly power while the car market in China has the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market. Based on these differences in market characteristics, explain how car makers in the U.S. will “behave” compared to carmakers in China. In particular, address the following considerations: How will the price of cars in the U.S. compare to the price of cars in China, everything else being equal?arrow_forwardThe auto industry in the U.S. has long been dominated by the Big Three carmakers: Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. The auto industry in China, on the other hand, has more than 170 carmakers. Automakers in the U.S. have some monopoly power while the car market in China has the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market. Based on these differences in market characteristics, explain how car makers in the U.S. will “behave” compared to carmakers in China. In particular, address the following considerations: How will the profits of carmakers in the U.S. compare to the profits of carmakers in China, everything else being equal?arrow_forward
- The auto industry in the U.S. has long been dominated by the Big Three carmakers: Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. The auto industry in China, on the other hand, has more than 170 carmakers. Automakers in the U.S. have some monopoly power while the car market in China has the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market. Based on these differences in market characteristics, explain how car makers in the U.S. will “behave” compared to carmakers in China. In particular, address the following considerations: How will carmakers in the U.S. respond to consumers’ desires compared to Chinese carmakers’ response to consumers’ desires, everything else being equal?arrow_forwardAccording to an article in China Daily, China recently accelerated its plan to privatize tens of thousands of state-owned firms. Imagine that you are an aide to a senator on the Foreign Relations Committee of the U.S. Senate, and you have been asked to help the committee determine the price and quantity that will prevail when competitive forces are allowed to equilibrate the market. The best estimates of the market demand and supply for the good (in U.S. dollar equivalent prices) are given by: Qd=12 -2P and Qs=-4 + 2P, respectively. a. Determine the competitive equilibrium price and quantity b. Based on your answer to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in question (2a), one of the senators raises a concern that the free market price might be too high for the typical Chinese citizen to pay. Accordingly, she asks you to explain what would happen if the Chinese government privatized the market, but then set a price at the Chinese equivalent of $3.00. How do you answer? What…arrow_forwardSuppose that two identical firms produce widgets and that they are the only firms in the market. The average and marginal cost is €60 for each firm. Price is determined by the following demand curve: P = 300 – Q where Q = Q1 + Q2. Suppose firm 1 is the leader and firm 2 is the follower. The output produced by each firm in a Stackelberg equilibrium is A. Firm 1 will produce 60 and Firm 2 will produce 120 B. Firm 1 will produce 80 and Firm 2 will produce 40 C. Firm 1 will produce 120 and Firm 2 will produce 40 D. Firm 1 will produce 120 and Firm 2 will produce 60arrow_forward
- Consider a market of 6 firms that compete through production. Demand is given as P = 220 – 2Q. Each firm has a marginal cost of $20. a. What will be the equilibrium firm quantities, market price, and firm profits? b. Suppose two firms merge in this market to become a leader. What will be the new equilibrium firm quantities, market price, and firm profits? Was it profitable for the firms to merge into a leader? Note that n = 5 after the merger. c. Suppose another two firms merge to form a second leader in the market. What will be the new equilibrium firm quantities, market price, and firm profits? Was it profitable for the followers to merge into a co-leader? Note that n = 4 and L = 2 after the merger:arrow_forwardSome economies are less healthy than they could be because both the market power and economic profit of some favored firms are protected by either government or some private force (e.g. mafia). Present a firm that has market power and is earning economic profit when it is maximizing profit. Explain how competition could help consumers by showing how the profit maximizing point for this firm might change, to the advantage of consumers, if competitors entered this market and competed against this firm.arrow_forwardPrice competition between firms, from the firms’ perspective, can be similar to the prisoners’ dilemma. The best outcome for all firms would be for all to charge a high price. However, if the other firms charge a high price, any individual firm has incentives to charge a low price and steal the market. Additionally, if any other firm chooses a low price, each firm should charge a low price too so that it doesn’t get priced out of the market. Explain how price-matching (firms announcing a policy where they match the lowest price a customer can find or will honor a competitor’s coupon) can help firms avoid the Nash equilibrium in which they all charge a low price. Is it misleading for a firm to advertise price-matching as being beneficial to consumers? (Hint: What outcomes of the game are ruled out by the price-matching policy? How does ruling out these outcomes change the game and the decision the firms face?)arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
