INVESTMENTS(LL)W/CONNECT
INVESTMENTS(LL)W/CONNECT
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260433920
Author: Bodie
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 12, Problem 24PS
Summary Introduction

(a)

To determine:

To set the spreadsheet for calculating the relative strength of the banking sector compared to the broad market.

Introduction:

Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 24PS

The spreadsheet is obtained and given in explanation.

Explanation of Solution

Given Information:

The data given in the website. The initial value of the sector index and S&P 500 Index is equal to 100. Each week's rate of return is to be used for updating the level of each index.

The data was downloaded from the given website.

    Week SPY rate FSRBX rate
    2013.01 1.64 1.75
    2013.02 0.17 0.55
    2013.03 -0.82 -0.92
    2013.04 0.85 0.93
    2013.05 0.59 0.92
    2013.06 -0.21 -0.08
    2013.07 0.12 1.37
    2013.08 1.19 1.80
    2013.09 -3.27 -2.73
    2013.10 -1.00 -0.58
    2013.11 -0.03 -0.87
    2013.12 3.25 1.09
    2013.13 -0.23 -0.21
    2013.14 -0.47 -3.37
    2013.15 0.47 0.00
    2013.16 -2.97 -1.55
    2013.17 -0.91 -1.75
    2013.18 0.07 0.40
    2013.19 -0.20 1.11
    2013.20 2.77 2.50
    2013.21 0.11 0.04
    2013.22 1.21 0.38
    2013.23 -0.27 -0.89
    2013.24 0.19 0.52
    2013.25 -0.85 -0.17
    2013.26 -1.02 -1.16
    2013.27 -0.92 0.04
    2013.28 -1.57 0.04
    2013.29 1.72 0.95
    2013.30 -3.60 -1.97
    2013.31 0.32 0.83
    2013.32 3.07 3.47
    2013.33 0.88 1.05
    2013.34 0.59 0.58
    2013.35 0.85 0.54
    2013.36 0.50 0.21
    2013.37 -1.49 -1.72
    2013.38 1.96 2.08
    2013.39 -1.00 0.16
    2013.40 -1.11 -0.37
    2013.41 -1.13 -1.51
    2013.42 2.91 3.28
    2013.43 3.61 2.73
    2013.44 1.29 1.60
    2013.45 -0.86 -2.16
    2013.46 0.79 1.18
    2013.47 0.76 0.19
    2013.48 0.06 -0.19
    2013.49 0.57 0.04
    2013.50 1.11 1.83
    2013.51 0.08 -0.15
    2013.52 -2.01 -2.22
    2014.01 -0.17 -1.56
    2014.02 -1.24 0.16
    2014.03 0.56 -0.28
    2014.04 2.38 2.74
    2014.05 0.45 -0.39
    2014.06 -0.32 -2.45
    2014.07 0.87 0.36
    2014.08 1.07 1.63
    2014.09 -1.91 -1.87
    2014.10 -1.15 -1.23
    2014.11 -1.18 -2.58
    2014.12 0.25 0.29
    2014.13 0.48 0.66
    2014.14 -3.26 -2.29
    2014.15 1.24 0.75
    2014.16 0.16 1.54
    2014.17 1.15 0.78
    2014.18 -1.17 -1.30
    2014.19 2.93 3.13
    2014.20 0.96 -0.52
    2014.21 -0.09 -0.36
    2014.22 0.05 -0.04
    2014.23 1.37 1.65
    2014.24 -1.96 -1.07
    2014.25 0.46 0.80
    2014.26 1.49 1.19
    2014.27 1.26 1.65
    2014.28 0.57 0.35
    2014.29 0.16 -0.92
    2014.30 -0.69 -1.24
    2014.31 0.14 0.04
    2014.32 -0.47 0.39
    2014.33 -1.39 -1.92
    2014.34 1.24 1.00
    2014.35 1.91 0.63
    2014.36 -0.46 0.08
    2014.37 -1.67 -2.36
    2014.38 1.32 -0.08
    2014.39 -2.79 -1.73
    2014.40 -0.78 0.04
    2014.41 -0.45 1.02
    2014.42 1.41 2.23
    2014.43 1.93 1.03
    2014.44 1.35 3.02
    2014.45 1.10 -0.19
    2014.46 1.60 1.72
    2014.47 -0.22 -0.68
    2014.48 -0.41 -0.38
    2014.49 0.55 0.72
    2014.50 0.31 0.19
    2014.51 -1.77 -1.73
    2014.52 3.15 2.41
    2015.01 0.19 -0.52
    2015.02 -2.10 -2.89
    2015.03 2.04 2.59
    2015.04 -1.76 -1.81
    2015.05 0.29 0.81
    2015.06 1.72 1.71
    2015.07 0.47 1.35
    2015.08 -0.50 -1.07
    2015.09 -0.13 0.07
    2015.1 1.99 2.13
    2015.11 -0.32 -0.51
    2015.12 -0.29 -0.66
    2015.13 -0.23 -0.04
    2015.14 -0.64 -0.41
    2015.15 1.90 1.37
    2015.16 0.24 3.11
    2015.17 0.80 0.57
    2015.18 -2.48 -2.76
    2015.19 -1.66 -1.49
    2015.2 1.01 0.59
    2015.21 0.48 1.06
    2015.22 -2.83 -0.80
    2015.23 -0.12 -1.72
    2015.24 -0.17 -1.60
    2015.25 2.29 2.08
    2015.26 -0.53 -0.11
    2015.27 -2.44 -1.30
    2015.28 0.34 2.67
    2015.29 3.25 2.31
    2015.3 0.17 0.72
    2015.31 -0.93 -1.99
    2015.32 2.89 1.88
    2015.33 -0.67 -1.14
    2015.34 1.23 0.54
    2015.35 -0.86 -0.54
    2015.36 1.73 1.80
    2015.37 -0.38 -0.25
    2015.38 1.61 0.78
    2015.39 1.08 0.67
    2015.4 1.20 0.87
    2015.41 0.15 -1.21
    2015.42 0.78 0.28
    2015.43 -1.00 -1.01
    2015.44 1.25 1.62
    2015.45 1.58 0.28
    2015.46 -0.05 -0.62
    2015.47 -0.09 -0.49
    2015.48 0.85 1.12
    2015.49 0.65 2.04
    2015.5 -1.11 0.03
    2015.51 0.62 0.34
    2015.52 -0.76 -0.74
    2016.01 1.92 0.34
    2016.02 -0.29 -0.65
    2016.03 -0.48 -0.27
    2016.04 1.88 1.78
    2016.05 -0.60 -0.20
    2016.06 1.24 1.82
    2016.07 -0.29 -0.50
    2016.08 -4.57 -4.10
    2016.09 1.52 0.35
    2016.1 -1.21 -1.77
    2016.11 3.51 3.45
    2016.12 -0.97 -2.21
    2016.13 1.58 -0.31
    2016.14 0.74 -0.24
    2016.15 2.27 3.50
    2016.16 0.61 -0.30
    2016.17 0.93 0.95
    2016.18 -0.03 0.34
    2016.19 1.16 0.60
    2016.2 -0.61 -0.97
    2016.21 1.57 0.84
    2016.22 -1.97 -2.20
    2016.23 1.78 1.47
    2016.24 -1.64 -2.55
    2016.25 -0.08 -0.41
    2016.26 1.70 1.18
    2016.27 1.22 0.24
    2016.28 -0.87 -3.31
    2016.29 -5.46 -5.40
    2016.3 -0.90 -4.03
    2016.31 0.63 5.80
    2016.32 0.00 3.71
    2016.33 2.51 0.07
    2016.34 -0.50 -1.49
    2016.35 -1.03 -2.52
    2016.36 1.94 1.66
    2016.37 2.55 2.50
    2016.38 0.40 -1.74
    2016.39 2.14 4.61
    2016.4 0.31 -2.58
    2016.41 -4.26 -7.57
    2016.42 2.63 2.98
    2016.43 -1.57 -6.13
    2016.44 -4.01 -2.14
    2016.45 0.45 -1.90
    2016.46 -1.14 -2.72
    2016.47 3.15 5.34
    2016.48 1.52 -0.24
    2016.49 -2.48 -6.53
    2016.5 1.18 1.08
    2016.51 -0.56 -1.15
    2016.52 -4.06 -6.69
    2017.01 -0.82 0.56
    2017.02 -5.77 -7.23
    2017.03 0.75 10.91
    2017.04 4.91 7.74
    2017.05 -4.67 -6.93
    2017.06 1.56 -1.07
    2017.07 0.35 0.45
    2017.08 -1.32 -5.12
    2017.09 -3.08 -6.53
    2017.1 -0.07 1.77
    2017.11 2.41 11.69
    2017.12 -0.43 -7.26
    2017.13 4.09 3.60
    2017.14 -2.56 -4.91
    2017.15 3.82 4.78
    2017.16 0.81 2.42
    2017.17 1.37 1.95
    2017.18 -1.85 -4.99
    2017.19 2.70 1.13
    2017.2 -3.52 -4.13
    2017.21 1.96 0.15
    2017.22 -2.89 -7.05
    2017.23 -0.11 -4.31
    2017.24 -2.87 -4.07
    2017.25 -3.08 -4.19
    2017.26 -0.96 -4.67
    2017.27 -1.95 -6.75
    2017.28 1.72 12.69
    2017.29 -0.40 1.30
    2017.3 0.55 7.63
    2017.31 2.54 1.03
    2017.32 0.62 -1.55
    2017.33 -0.40 -3.05
    2017.34 -0.66 3.25
    2017.35 -3.40 3.86
    2017.36 1.35 2.30
    2017.37 -0.99 10.94
    2017.38 -2.63 -10.46
    2017.39 -8.70 -5.66
    2017.4 -19.79 -18.66
    2017.41 5.33 9.99
    2017.42 -6.63 -7.68
    2017.43 11.25 13.61
    2017.44 -3.07 -8.20
    2017.45 -7.71 -6.40
    2017.46 -8.19 -20.03
    2017.47 13.29 25.04
    2017.48 -2.39 -0.34
    2017.49 1.20 -6.79
    2017.5 -0.09 2.69
    2017.51 -1.17 -2.55
    2017.52 6.66 -0.29

The graph of the relative strength for S&P 500 and FB is plotted as shown below.

Using the price movements and their changing speed, the relative strength of the fund against the S&P 500 can be measured.

INVESTMENTS(LL)W/CONNECT, Chapter 12, Problem 24PS

Summary Introduction

(b)

To determine:

To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio exceeds by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial increase the banking sector outperforms S&P500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P500.

Introduction:

Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 24PS

As per the data, 16 times the relative strength increases more than 5%.

Explanation of Solution

Given Information:

The data is available in the given website.

Of the 255 total instances, there are 16 times when the relative strength increases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.

Here, it is seen that 10 times the FSRBX underperformed the S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.

There are 6 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.

Summary Introduction

(c)

Requirement 3 To Determine:

To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio decreases by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial decrease the banking sector outperforms S&P 500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P 500.

Introduction:

Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 24PS

As per the data, 31 times the relative strength moves decrease by greater than 5%.

Explanation of Solution

Given Information:

The data is available in the given website.

Of the 255 total instances, there are 31 times when the relative strength decreases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.

Here it is seen that 17 times the FSRBX underperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.

There are 14 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.

Summary Introduction

(d)

Requirement 4 To Determine:

To determine how well the relative strength rule functions in identifying the selling or buying opportunities.

Introduction:

Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 24PS

The data above gives the bullish sign and the bearish sign.

Explanation of Solution

Given Information:

The data is available in the given website.

We can see the relative strength depicted in second part of requirement as bullish sign. Here the FB fund is likely to underperform the S&P 500 index than to perform better than the index according to this signal.

We can see the relative strength depicted in third part of requirement as bearish sign. Here the FB fund did not give a better performance than the index but there is no statistical difference succeeding the considerable change in the relative strength. There is random successive performance.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Please refer to the formulas in the lesson and on the following website.  Pay particular attention to the examples. Scroll to the bottom to review a table with a list of various formula arrangements that may be helpful in completing this assignment. 1) If you deposit $4,000 today in a bank account and the interest is compounded annually at 10 percent, what will be the value of this investment: a. five years from now? b. ten years from now? c. fifteen years from now? d. twenty years from now? 2) If a business manager deposits $12,000 in a savings account at the end of each year for twenty years, what will be the value of her investment: a. at a compounded rate of 12 percent? b. at a compounded rate of 18 percent? 3) The chief financial officer of a home health agency needs to determine the present value of a $60,000 investment received at the end of year 15. What is the present value if the discount rate is 5%? 4) After completing her residency, an obstetrician plans to invest $9,000…
Assume you deposit $1,000 in your savings account. Performance a sensitivity analysison the relationship between future value at the end of year 10 and interest rate. Plot therelationship on a chart and label the graph clearly
Suppose that you have $1,000,000 available for investment for a period of four years. After investigating the local banks, you have compiled the following table for comparison.   Bank                                                 Interest Rate                        Compounding Scotia Bank                                           10%                                       Annually National Commercial Bank                     9%                                       Semi-annually First Caribbean International Bank         6.8%                                    Quarterly   Using the Future Value concept (based on calculation), in which bank should you deposit your funds to maximize return and why?
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
International Financial Management
Finance
ISBN:9780357130698
Author:Madura
Publisher:Cengage
Text book image
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305627734
Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:Cengage Learning