In 1969, at the age of seventeen, Person A began working for company P. She had reached the rank of a bookkeeper, chief of office and right-hand treasurer by 2007. The board of chiefs of company P, in recognition of their capacity, dedication, and long service time, agreed to increase the month-to-month salary of Individual A to $4,000 and make a retirement plan. The agreement allowed person A to be granted the privilege of withdrawing from the complex contract if she wished to accept a retirement payment of $2,000 per month for life, even though the board expressed in faith that Person A would continue to represent the organization for a long time. Person A, as it may be, agreed to resign two a long time later. Company F has paid her retirement pay to Person A until 2016. The business suspended instalments from that point on. To discuss: The arguments that the company’s promise to pay person A $2,000 per month for life is enforceable.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1TS

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

In 1969, at the age of seventeen, Person A began working for company P. She had reached the rank of a bookkeeper, chief of office and right-hand treasurer by 2007. The board of chiefs of company P, in recognition of their capacity, dedication, and long service time, agreed to increase the month-to-month salary of Individual A to $4,000 and make a retirement plan. The agreement allowed person A to be granted the privilege of withdrawing from the complex contract if she wished to accept a retirement payment of $2,000 per month for life, even though the board expressed in faith that Person A would continue to represent the organization for a long time. Person A, as it may be, agreed to resign two a long time later. Company F has paid her retirement pay to Person A until 2016. The business suspended instalments from that point on.

To discuss: The arguments that the company’s promise to pay person A $2,000 per month for life is enforceable.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Prior to her death in 2023, Elfrieda made lifetime taxable gifts of $34,000. At her death, she was survived by her husband and daughter and owned the following property interests. Sole ownership: Life insurance on her husband's life with a death benefit of $500,000 and a replacement cost of $120,000, with her children as the beneficiaries A portfolio of stocks, bonds, and CDs valued at $8,000,000 Personal residence with a fair market value of $500,000 Joint ownership: With her husband: household furnishings, personal property, bank accounts, and automobiles worth a total of $800,000 With her daughter: a vacation condo valued at $400,000 for which her executor has records showing a 20% contribution by her daughter Her will bequeaths the personal residence outright to her husband with the rest and remainder of her estate to her daughter. She had debts of $6,000 and administrative costs of $24,000. Which one of these amounts, if any, most closely approximates Elfrieda's estate tax…

Jean died in a common-law state in 2023 and was survived by her husband, Loren, and three adult children. Jean's gross estate, all of which was owned solely in her name, was composed of the following assets and date of death fair market values: Assets Values Common stock $ 4,900,000 Residence 750,000 Personal property 60,000 IRAs 3,450,000 Hummel figurines 175,000 Total Assets $ 9,335,000 Jean's only liabilities, together with their date of death balance, were as follows: Liabilities Balance Mortgage on residence $175,000 Car loan 8,000 Total $183,000 The following is a list of all of the gratuitous transfers that Jean made during her lifetime: 2000: Placed the common stock listed above in an irrevocable trust in which she retained the right to a 5% distribution of the trust account revalued annually for 25 years with the remainder to her children at her death; the date of gift fair market value of the stock was $190,000; the value of Jean's…

Non-forfeiture provisions are included in whole life and endowment policies to assure the policyowner that certain minimum policy benefits shall remain with him even under certain changed conditions. Non-forfeiture values guarantee to the policyowner that A) No death claim will be denied for any misstatement on the application B) Any guaranteed policy values will belong to the policy owner even if premium payments are discounted The face amount of the policy will remain the same even if the insured's health becomes impaired The premium on the policy will remain the same even when another beneficiary D) is added to the policy