Person G entered in to a contract with person M in order to purchase plaza H. Person G visited plaza H numerous times and noted that water system, sewer and occupancy. Person G never asked to see the books and nor person M attempt to conceal them. After purchasing the plaza H, he repaired the septic and well systems. Three years later he sold the plaza H because of deficit and sued defendant challenging that defendant made fraudulent statements on which while purchasing the park. To discuss: The decisions regarding fraudulent statements.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 11, Problem 13CP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person G entered in to a contract with person M in order to purchase plaza H. Person G visited plaza H numerous times and noted that water system, sewer and occupancy. Person G never asked to see the books and nor person M attempt to conceal them. After purchasing the plaza H, he repaired the septic and well systems. Three years later he sold the plaza H because of deficit and sued defendant challenging that defendant made fraudulent statements on which while purchasing the park.

To discuss: The decisions regarding fraudulent statements.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

David E. Ross, his two brothers, and their families operated and owned the entire stock of five businesses. Ross had three children: Rod, David II, and Betsy. David II and Betsy were not involved in the operation of the companies, but Rod began working for one of the firms, Equitable Life and Casualty Insurance Company, in 2007. Between 2009 and 2013, the elder Ross informed a number of persons of his desire to reward Rod for his work with Equitable Life by giving him stock in addition to the stock he would inherit. He subsequently executed several stock transfers to Rod, representing shares in various family businesses, which were reflected by appropriate entries on the corporate books. Certificates were issued in Rod’s name and placed in an envelope identified with the name Rod Ross, but they were kept with the other family stock certificates in an office safe to which Rod did not have access. In all, one-fourth of the stock holdings of David E. Ross were transferred to Rod in this…

In August, Victoria Air Conditioning, Inc. (VAC), entered into a subcontract for insulation services with Southwest Texas Mechanical Insulation Company (SWT), a partnership comprising Charlie Jupe and Tommy Nabors. In February of the following year, Jupe and Nabors dissolved the partnership, but VAC did not receive notice of the dissolution at that time. Sometime later, insulation was removed from Nabors’s premises to Jupe’s possession and Jupe continued the insulation project with VAC. From then on, Nabors had no more involvement with SWT. One month later, Nabors informed VAC’s project manager, Von Behrenfeld, that Nabors was no longer associated with SWT, had formed his own insulation company, and was interested in bidding on new jobs. Subsequently, SWT failed to perform the subcontract and Jupe could not be found. VAC brought suit for breach of contract against SWT, Jupe, and Nabors. Nabors claims that several letters and change orders introduced by both parties show that VAC knew…

Johnson, who owned a hardware store, was indebted to Hutchinson, one of her suppliers. Johnson sold her business to Lockhart, one of Johnson’s previous competitors, who combined the inventory from Johnson’s store with his own and moved them to a new, larger store. Hutchinson claims that Lockhart must pay Johnson’s debt because the sale of the business had been made without complying with the requirements of the bulk sales law. Discuss whether Lockhart is obligated to pay Hutchison’s debt to Johnson.