The people D, S, B and a teenage boy were casted away in the sea on a lifeboat due to a storm. The only means of sustenance they had was two pounds of turnip which eventually got finished. So, D proposed to sacrifice one of the four persons on the boat for further sustenance, to which S agreed but B disagreed. The boy was ignored. The following day, D killed the boy who had become quite weak, and all three fed on him for survival until they were saved four days later by an ongoing boat. After being rescued, they were put to trial for the murder of the boy in England. To Explain: The possibility of three survivors to be subjected to penalties as per English criminal law given their unique circumstances.

Question

Consider the given situation: David was walking through a subway station that was highly crowded. He took out his handgun and fired it randomly because he liked the sound made by the firing. Even though David has no intent to shot anyone in the crowd, the shot fired by him injured Susan. David will be held liable for which type of tort? a) Negligence b) Strict liability c) Intentional tort d) Recklessness Answer Submit O O O O

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 6BCP

Summary Introduction

Case Summary: The people D, S, B and a teenage boy were casted away in the sea on a lifeboat due to a storm. The only means of sustenance they had was two pounds of turnip which eventually got finished. So, D proposed to sacrifice one of the four persons on the boat for further sustenance, to which S agreed but B disagreed. The boy was ignored. The following day, D killed the boy who had become quite weak, and all three fed on him for survival until they were saved four days later by an ongoing boat. After being rescued, they were put to trial for the murder of the boy in England.

To Explain: The possibility of three survivors to be subjected to penalties as per English criminal law given their unique circumstances.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Consider the given situation: David was walking through a subway station that was highly crowded. He took out his handgun and fired it randomly because he liked the sound made by the firing. Even though David has no intent to shot anyone in the crowd, the shot fired by him injured Susan. David will be held liable for which type of tort? a) Negligence b) Strict liability c) Intentional tort d) Recklessness Answer Submit O O O O

Walter lives in South Carolina and drives to Maryland to visit his sick mother. He is driving 75 mph while going around Baltimore and his car hits a patch of ice. His car crashes into a car and causes a chain reaction involving 15 other cars and drivers. Fred, who is driving his Lamborghini to the grocery store, suffers damage in the amount of $75,000. Naturally, Fred and the other drivers will sue for damages. There are many drivers involved. With respect to Fred, what will the court’s opinion be as to whether he can sue in Federal Court? Does Fred meet the qualifications? If so, why? If not, why? Discuss thoroughly.

A statute requiring railroads to fence their tracks is construed as intended solely to prevent animals that stray onto the right-of-way from being hit by trains. B&A Railroad Company fails to fence its tracks. Two of Calvin’s cows wander onto the track. Nellie is hit by a train. Elsie is poisoned by weeds growing beside the track. For which cow(s), if any, is B&A Railroad Company liable to Calvin? Why?