A case is filed against the company A, LLC in California court for the leakage of personal information of 650,000 members to public. The company A claims that they have a “forum-selection clause” in their member agreement, putting the jurisdiction of all the disputes in Virginia, and a US Supreme Court precedent that “forum-selection clause” will be unenforceable if it is against the public policy. Also, the policies of the company A have been declared against public policy by Californian courts in other cases of the company A. To Explain: Application of stare decisis in California Court to determine the case.

Question

Assume that there are two conflicting statutes. One of the statutes is a state statute published in 1970, and the other statute is a federal statute published in 1995. Each of these two statutes is about interstate commerce. Which statute would prevail? O It depends on the jurisdiction. O The state statute, because interstate commerce is a state issue. O The federal statute, because it is newer. O The federal statute, because of the supremacy clause. O The state statute, because of the division of federalism.

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 4BCP

Summary Introduction

Case Summary:A case is filed against the company A, LLC in California court for the leakage of personal information of 650,000 members to public. The company A claims that they have a “forum-selection clause” in their member agreement, putting the jurisdiction of all the disputes in Virginia, and a US Supreme Court precedent that “forum-selection clause” will be unenforceable if it is against the public policy. Also, the policies of the company A have been declared against public policy by Californian courts in other cases of the company A.

To Explain:Application of stare decisis in California Court to determine the case.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Assume that there are two conflicting statutes. One of the statutes is a state statute published in 1970, and the other statute is a federal statute published in 1995. Each of these two statutes is about interstate commerce. Which statute would prevail? O It depends on the jurisdiction. O The state statute, because interstate commerce is a state issue. O The federal statute, because it is newer. O The federal statute, because of the supremacy clause. O The state statute, because of the division of federalism.

46 which of the following creditor policies is permissible under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA A) 20-year-old married applicant is individually creditworthy, but the creditor requires a spousal signature on the security instrument is located in a community property state B) A 20-year-old single applicant is individually creditworthy, but the creditor requires a parental co-signer due to the applicant's C) A 75-year-old marred applicant is individually creditworthy, but the creditor requires a spousel signature because the spouse is younger more likely to outlive the loan term. D) A 75-year-old single applicant is individually creditworthy, but the creditor requires a co- signer because a portion of the applicant qualifying income from public assistance.

Please respond true or false to the following statements regarding intellectual property protections. There are only civil remedies for all form of intellectual property violations. Copyright protection never expires. Once federally registered, trademark protection can continue indefinitely provided the mark remains in use. Patent & Copyright registration is handled by the same organization in Washington DC. All patents last for 20 years.