Which of the following statements about innovation is NOT true? O Successful innovation allows a firm to extract temporary monopoly profits. Process innovations are made possible through advances such as the Internet. O Innovation as a competitive weapon can simultaneously create and destroy value. Innovation has to be high-tech in order to be a potent competitive weapon.

Innovation is the 'application of concepts' in a way that results in the creation of new products or services or enhances the provision of existing ones. 'Realizing' or 'dispersing value' is done by a new or 'altered entity'. The emphasis on 'novelty', advancement, and dissemination of concepts or technology is a recurring theme in the definitions. The creation of more efficient goods, procedures, services, technology, works of art, or business models, which innovators then make available to consumers, governments, and society as a whole, is a common way that innovation occurs. Innovation and invention are connected, but they are not the same thing. Innovation is more likely to include the 'practical application of an invention' (i.e., new / enhanced capacity) to make a significant influence on a market or society, and not all innovations call for a new invention. The statement in Option D, "Innovation must be 'high tech' in 'order' to be an effective competitive weapon," is incorrect. Because Innovation is a method and mindset that is human-centered. A varied team, experimentation, iteration, and the drive to learn from mistakes are necessary for this approach. New technologies may be created as a result of innovative solutions, but creativity does not equate to technology. Technology is concrete, but innovation may be intangible. The invention process may potentially be used in regular life. Innovation may be implemented through technology, but technology doesn't create innovation by itself. While it might be a 'usefu'l and 'effective tool for testing' and 'iterating' more 'quickly' and 'effectively', innovation doesn't end there. Innovation doesn't always have to be difficult or need for really cutting-edge technology that may not even be accessible to our audience, depending on the issue. It could simply lead to straightforward solutions that weren't previously considered and that can be quickly implemented for the benefit of our target consumers. Reasons for Not selecting other Options: a. A company can reap temporary monopoly profits through successful invention.Monopolists can grow their outputs, drop their prices, and cut costs thanks to innovation. As a corporation with market power grows more efficient, customers must sacrifice larger surpluses because the progressive monopolist is unable to deliver the new, larger competitive production. This raises the potential cost of monopoly. In other words, innovation raises the 'deadweight cost' of monopoly, increasing the social benefit of competition. b. Process innovation is enabled by technological advancements like the Internet.The activity of analysing an organization's processes and rebuilding them using 'cutting-edge technology' to enhance performance and support the processes is known as process innovation. The 'Internet of Things' has enormous promise for process innovation since it allows for the digitalization of physical objects and settings. In order to determine what digital choices are available for a particular business process, information needs are employed. Here, digital alternatives should be regarded as chances to use IT to support process innovation. c. 'Firms' must be able to 'innovate' while thwarting the attempts of competitors to copy their ideas due to the power of innovation as a competitive weapon, which may both produce and destroy value.

Related questions