Which of the following is a significant difference in the outcomes between the dictator game and the ultimatum game? Multiple Choice O Self-interest is revealed more strongly in the ultimatum game than in the dictator game. The ultimatum game tends to result in a more even split of the money. There is little difference, as fairness considerations lead to similar splits of the money in both games. The dictator game tends to result in a more even split of the money.

Which of the following is a significant difference in the outcomes between the dictator game and the ultimatum game? Multiple Choice O Self-interest is revealed more strongly in the ultimatum game than in the dictator game. The ultimatum game tends to result in a more even split of the money. There is little difference, as fairness considerations lead to similar splits of the money in both games. The dictator game tends to result in a more even split of the money.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following story: Charlie finds two fifty-pence pieces on the floor. His friend Dylan is standing next to him when he finds them. Chris can offer Dylan nothing at all, one of the fifty-pence pieces, or both. Dylan observes the offer made by Charlie, and can either accept the offer (in which case they each receive the split specified by Charlie) or reject the offer.If he rejects the offer, each player gets nothing at all (because Charlie is embarassed and throws the moneyaway).(a) Formulate this interaction as an extensive-form game. To keep things simple, players’ payoff is equal to their monetary gain.(b) List all histories of the game. Split these into terminal and non-terminal histories.(c) What are the strategies available to Charlie? What are the strategies available to Dylan? Draw the strategic-form game.(d) Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of this game.(e) What do you think will happen?
Consider the following game: you and a partner on a school project are asked to evaluate the other, privately rating them either "1 (Good)" or "0 (Bad)". After all the ratings have been done, a bonus pot of $1000 is given to the person with the highest number of points. If there is a tie, the pool is split evenly. Both players only get utility from money. Mark all of the following true statements: A. The best response to your partner rating you as Good is to rate them as Good as well. Your answer B. There is no best response in this game. C. Your partner's best response to you rating them as Bad is to also rate you as C Bad. D. Your best response to any strategy of your partner is to play "Good".
100 people are choosing between two beaches to go to in the Florida Keys. Beach L is big and never gets crowded, but it is not very nice; the utility from going to Beach L is u(L) = 60. Beach M is much nicer but very small, so it gets crowded; the utility from going to Beach M is u(M) = 100-NM ; NM is the number of people that %3D go to Beach M. 5) The Nash equilibrium number of people that go to Beach L is A) 20 B) 40 C) 60 D) 80 E) 100 5).
Economics CHOOSE THE CORRECT ANSWER. Remember that in the equilibrium prediction of an ultimatum game, the Proposer will offer the smallest non-zero amount of money possible. First-year Commerce students were asked to play an Ultimatum game where a choice had to be made over the division of R100. Offers could only be made in R10 increments, and the results of the various offers made are reported in the table below. Amount offered by Proposer RO R10 R20 R30 R40 R50 Proportion rejected 100% 60% 50% 30% 10% 0% What is the equilibrium split of the R100 between the Proposer and the Responder? O A. Proposer: R50, Responder: R50 O B. Proposer: R10, Responder: R90 O C. Proposer: R90, Responder: R10 O D. Proposer: R60, Responder: R40 O E. Proposer: R40, Responder: R60
In this version of the ultimatum game experiment, one participant is given £100, and is told to offer to split that amount with another participant. The second player can either refuse to accept the division, in which case the participant receiving the £100 has to give it back, or can accept the division, in which case, the player receiving the money splits the £100 as proposed. For the participant who has to accept or reject the offer A) The best strategy is to accept any offer which meets the social norm for fairness. B) The best strategy is to threaten to turn down any transfer of less than £100 to ensure that the person receiving the money makes a fair offer. C) There is a dominant strategy to accept any offer because gaining some money is better than gaining no money D) There is a dominant strategy to turn down any offer other than £50 because an unequal split would be unfair.
Let us see the example of Juan and María given but modify their preferences. It is still the case that they are competitive and are deciding whether to show up at their mom’s house at 8:00 A.M., 9:00 A.M., 10:00 A.M., or 11:00 A.M. But now they don’t mind waking up early. Assume that the payoff is 1 if he or she shows up before the other sibling, it is 0 if he or she shows up after the other sibling, and it is 1 if they show up at the same time. The time of the morning does not matter. Find all Nash equilibria.
Subgame Perfect Equilibrium. Stephen J. Seagull must decide whether or not to start a new movie project. If he decides not to, he and Clod VandeCamp both get a utility of 10. If he decides to begin the project, both he and Clod must simultaneously decide who the director should be: George Spellbinder, or Ed Tree. If they disagree on the director, the movie isn't made, but both have wasted time, so they get only a utility of 0. If they agree on George Spellbinder, the movie will be a roaring success, and each gets a utility of 20. If they agree on Ed Tree, the movie will be terrible. and they will only get a utility of 5. (a). Draw the extensive form of this game. (b). Write down the normal form. (c). Find all Nash equilibria. (d). Apply the theory of iterated elimination of weakly dominated strategies and state its prediction. (e). Find all the subgame perfect equilibria.
PLEASE CHECK THIS HOW TO SOLVE PLEASE TEACH EXPLAIN STEP BY STEP
The action set of player 1 is {1,2, 3, 4, 5} (not considering the $ sign). When both players are rational, the theoretical SPNE is (5, 1). Now answer the following problems. What is the dollar equivalent of utility of happiness to ensure player 2 to accept the 2$ offer of player 1? Just write the number, no need to put the $ sign. 5| 5 What is the dollar equivalent of utility of happiness to ensure player 2 to accept the 4$ offer of player 1? Just write the number, no need to put the $ sign. 100 100
There are three players who must each choose an “effort” level from 1 to 7, that is, Si = {1, 2, 3, ..., 7}. The payoff for each player i is ui(si, s−i) = 10 max{s1, s2, s3} − si. How many pure- strategy Nash equilibria are there? Select one: a.2 b.4 c.none of the other answers d.3 e.1
Boris and Leo are playing an ultimatum bargaining game, with £1000 to share. Boris is the proposer. Suppose Leo has the following preferences: his utility in monetary terms is the amount of money he gets minus 40 percent of Boris's amount Which of the following statements is/are correct? a) If Leo's preferences change so that his utility in monetary terms were the amount of money he gets minus 100 percent of Boris's amount, his minimum acceptable offer would increase. b) The minimum offer Leo will accept is larger than £250. c) The description of Leo's preferences suggest that Leo is altruistic.
A husband and wife would produce incomes Yh and Yw in their fallback situations. The utility each derives in any circumstance is just equal to his or her consumption expenditure in that circumstance. In their fallback situations, their consumption expenditure levels are just equal to their incomes. Thus their fallback levels of utility are Yh and Yw. If they cooperate, they produce Z>Yh + Yw. They engage in Nash cooperative bargaining to determine how to allocate Z across the consumption of the husband, Ch, and consumption of the wife, Cw, subject to the budget constraint that Ch + Cw = Z. Under any bargained allocation, the two would derive utilities of Ch and Cw. What do Ch and Cw equal if Yh = Yw (but this quantity is not equal to zero)? Please do fast ASAP fast