-
Two firms compete in
price in a market for infinite periods. In this market, there are N consumers; each buys one unit per period if the price does not exceed $10 and nothing otherwise. Consumers buy from the firm selling at a lower price. In case both firms charge the same price, assume N/2 consumers buy from each firm. Assume zero production cost for both firms.A possible strategy that may support the collusive equilibrium is: Announce a price of $10 if the
equilibrium price has always been $10; otherwise, announce the price as in Nash equilibrium of the one-shot Bertrand game.1.a Let δ be the discount factor. Find the condition on δ such that the above strategy can indeed support the collusive equilibrium.
Now suppose that Firm 2’s marginal cost is $4, but Firm 1’s marginal cost remains at zero.
1.b Find the condition on δ under which Firm 2 will not deviate from the collusive equilibrium.
1.c Find the condition on δ under which Firm 1 will not deviate from the collusive equilibrium.
1.d Knowing that both firms’ discount factor is 0.6, how should Firm 2 set its capacity constraint so that the collusive equilibrium can still be supported? (Hint: The idea here is that, by limiting its own output, Firm 2 lets Firm 1 have a greater market share. As a result, Firm 1’s gain of deviating from the collusive agreement would be smaller.)
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
- There are two firms in a market and they compete in a Nash-Cournot manner. Firm 1 faces the demand function p1(g1,92) = 200 - 91 - 92, and has a total cost function TC1 = (91)2. Firm 2 faces the demand function p2(91,92) = 160 - 92 - 91, and has a total %3D cost function TC2 = (92)2. Answer each of the following questions. a. Find the Nash-Cournot equilibrim output and price v for firm 1. b. Find the Nash-Cournot equilibrim output v and price v for firm 2.arrow_forwardSuppose that firms in a two-firm industry choose quantities every month, and each month the firms sell at the market-clearing price determined by the quantities they choose. Each firm has a constant marginal cost, and the market demand curve is linear of the form P = a - bQ, where Q is total industry quantity and P is the market price. Suppose that initially each firm has the same constant marginal cost. Further suppose that each month the firms attain the Cournot equilibrium in quantities. a) Suppose that it is observed that from one month to the next Firm 1’s quantity goes down, Firm 2’s quantity goes up, and the market price goes up. A change in the demand and/or cost conditions consistent with what we observe is: i) The market demand curve shifted leftward in a parallel fashion. ii) The market demand curve shifted rightward in a parallel fashion. iii) Firm 1’s marginal cost went up, while Firm 2’s marginal cost stayed the same. iv) Firm 2’s…arrow_forwardTwo firms produce a homogeneous good and compete in price. Prices can only take integer values. The demand curve is Q = 6 p, where p denotes the lower of the two prices. The lower - priced firm meets all the market demand. If the two firms post the same price p, each one gets half the market demand at that price, i. e., each gets (6p)/2. Production cost is zero.a) Show that the best response to your rival posting a price of 6 is to post the monopoly price of 3. What is the best response against a rival's price of 4? of 5?arrow_forward
- Two gas stations in a rural town can engage in collusion over pricing. Because drivers often just stop at the first station they see as they go through town, price competition is not that severe in the first place. Assume either station can price gas at $0.30 above average total cost or $0.50 above average total cost. If they have equal prices, they split the market. If they have unequal prices, the lower price station gets 75% of the market (assume for simplicity no change in the size of the market; price elasticity of demand is very low for short term changes in the price of oil).a. Draw the normal form representation of this game. Identify the key aspects of the game.b. Identify the dominant strategy, if any, for each player.c. Identify any Nash equilibria.arrow_forwardcost function is c(y) An industry has two firms. Firm 1's cost function is c(y) = 3y + 200 and firm 2's 3y + 100. The demand curve for the output of this industry is a downward-sloping straight line. In a Cournot equilibrium, where both firms produce positive amounts of output: = The firm with higher fixed costs produces more. Both firms produce the same amount of output. There is less output than there would be if the firms colluded to maximize joint profits. It is not possible to tell because the demand function is not specified. The firm with lower fixed costs produces more.arrow_forwardConsider the following oligopolistic market. In the first stage, Firm 1 chooses quantity q1₁. Firms 2 and 3 observe Firm 1's choice, and then proceed to simultaneously choose 92 and 93, respectively. Market demand is given by p(Q) = 100 – · Q, and Q = 9₁ +92 +93. Firm 1's costs are c₁ (9₁) = 591, firm 2's costs are c₂ (92) = 492 and firm 3's costs are C3 (93) = 493. C2 Starting from the end of the game, you can express Firm 2's best response function in terms of 9₁ and 93, and you can similarly express Firm 3's best response function in terms of 9₁ and 92. Using these, answer the following questions. If rounding is needed, write your answers to 3 decimal places. a) If Firm 1 chooses q₁ = 3, what quantity will Firm 2 choose? b) If Firm 1 chooses 9₁ = 100, what quantity will Firm 2 choose? c) In the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game, firm 1 produces what quantity? d) In the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game, firm 2 and firm 3 each produce what quantity?arrow_forward
- cost function is c(y) An industry has two firms. Firm 1's cost function is c(y) = 3y + 200 and firm 2's 3y + 100. The demand curve for the output of this industry is a downward-sloping straight line. In a Cournot equilibrium, where both firms produce positive amounts of output: = The firm with higher fixed costs produces more. Both firms produce the same amount of output. There is less output than there would be if the firms colluded to maximize joint profits. It is not possible to tell because the demand function is not specified. The firm with lower fixed costs produces more.arrow_forwardTwo firms A and B produce a product jointly. The total value to the two firms from the joint venture is given by V = √iA + √iB where iA and iB are the firms’ respective investment levels. After the investment levels have been chosen, the firms divide V equally. a) Find the Nash equilibrium investment levels, and the payoffs for each firm. b) Suppose that A and B merge. Find the optimal investment levels and the payoffs for the merged firm. Do the firms benefit from the merger? Why?arrow_forwardThe marginal cost of a product is fixed at MC = 20. The demand for the product is Q = 100 - 2P. (a) Now consider a Cournot model with two firms that are choosing quantities simultaneously. What is the best reply (best response) function for each firm? What is theNash equilibrium? What is the total surplus? (b)What do you expect the total surplus would be with three firms? Why? (You do not need to calculate an exact value. You can say ”total surplus is at least 100”, or ”total surplus is at most 80”)arrow_forward
- Suppose that there are two firms in the market. The market demand is given by P=220 - 2Q, where Q is the total output (Q=Q1+Q2). Each firm has an identical cost function, TCi=8Qi, i=1, 2. Consider the collusion, in which they decide the output level together to maximize the joint profit. If they divide the production into half, then each firm should produce Qi= _______ units in order to maximize the joint profit.arrow_forwardProblem 5.1. The inverse market demand for printer paper is given by P = 400 – 2Q. There are two firms who compete to produce this paper, each with a marginal cost of production equal to c = 40 over a large range of output (ie, assume constant marginal cost). The two firms compete in quantities, in other words they each simultaneously choose a quantity to produce (Cournot competition). Derive the Cournot-Nash equilibrium of this game. Please write final answers in the boxes, showing work in blank areas. (a) The reaction function for each firm. 91 (92): 92 (91) (b) Optimal output q for each firm. 92 = р = = π1 = (c) Market price (from demand curve). (d) Firm profits. 92 = π2 =arrow_forwardSuppose the robot assistant market consists of two firms: MultiTech and MicroRobo. Each of the two firms must simultaneously choose to set either a high price or a low price for its robots. If both MultiTech and MicroRobo set a high price, their profits will be SEK 30 million each. Conversely, if they both set a low price, their profits will be only SEK 3 million. On the other hand, if one firm sets a high price while the other sets a low price, the high-priced firm will incur a loss of SEK 15 million, while the low-priced firm will gain a profit of SEK 90 million. Answer the following questions: a) Write the payoff matrix of this game. b) How many Nash equilibria are there? Identify each equilibrium, what is the dominant strategy? c) Suppose MultiTech has a well-known brand, therefore receiving profits 15% higher than MicroRobo in all strategies. Explain how this would affect the payoff matrix and the firms' strategies.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education