ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Three roommates, Alan, Billy and Casey, are planning to spend the weekend in their dorm room watching old movies, and they are debating how many to watch. Table below indicates their
|
1st movie
|
2nd movie
|
3rd movie
|
4th movie
|
5th movie
|
Alan
|
$20
|
$10
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
Billy
|
$30
|
$20
|
$10
|
$0
|
$0
|
Casey
|
$50
|
$40
|
$30
|
$20
|
$10
|
Explain why some people believe that the showing of a movie within the dorm room is a public good.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Markets and Common Resources. This problem is also called “the tragedy of the commons.” There are seven families in the village. Each family has $70 to spend on either a steer or a bond. A steer today costs $70 per steer; a bond costs $70. In one year, a family can sell their steer that uses the common grazing land (the common resource) for the village. The revenue and price received for selling a steer depend upon how many other families are selling their steers. See the demand for steers in the graph below. A family can buy one steer or buy one bond. Therefore, the number of steers is the number of families that decided to buy a steer. If a family holds the $70 in cash, the family will earn nothing. Each family has $70. If a family buys a bond today for $70, they will receive $90 in one year. A family can only earn income from raising & selling steers or from buying and holding bonds. Hint: complete the table first. How many families will want to buy a…arrow_forwardSuppose that the St Clair river, which flows along the border between Ontario and Michigan, becomes polluted and needs to be cleaned. The American and Canadian governments need to make a decision on whether to clean the river or not. They must make this decision simultaneously. If both countries invest in cleaning the river, they each get a payoff of 871. If one country invests in cleaning the river, but the other one doesn't, the country that spends the money on the cleanup gets a payoff of 161, while the other country gets to enjoy the benefits of the clean river without having to spend any money, and therefore gets a payoff of 1159. If neither country invests in cleaning the river, they must both deal with the consequences of the pollution, and they each get a payoff of -639. Suppose that the U.S. and Canada are again making decisions simultaneously. Find the Nash Equilibrium in mixed strategies. In the mixed strategy Nash Equilibrium, what is the probability that Canada invests in…arrow_forwardScenario 10-1 The demand curve for gasoline slopes downward and the supply curve for gasoline slopes upward. The production of the 1,000th gallon of gasoline entails the following: a private cost of $3.10 • a social cost of $3-55 a value to consumers of $3.70 Refer to Scenario 10-1. Suppose the equilibrium quantity of gasoline is 1,150 gallons; that is, QMARKET = 1,150. Then the equilibrium price of a gallon could be a. $3.30. b. $3.80. c. $3.00. d. $2.80.arrow_forward
- Van and Amy each rent one unit of a two-unit apartment building. The building has two separate furnaces located between the two apartments. The renters each control and pay for the heat their furnaces generate and would choose to increase the temperature of their apartments by 45 degrees if the other never turned on their furnace, given that the marginal private benefit (MB) of the 45th degree is equal to the marginal cost (MC) of 1 degree of heat (assume that the MC of heat is constant and that the MB of heat is decreasing). However, each degree of heat paid for by one not only raises the temperature in that apartment by a degree but also raises the temperature in the other apartment by half a degree. As a result, if Amy were to buy 40 degrees of heat, then Van would need to purchase only benefit of the final degree was equal to the marginal cost. Use the blue line (circle symbol) to plot Van's best-response function (BRF) on the following graph, with the total amount of heat he will…arrow_forwardPlayer 2 Middle Left P1: $45 P1: $70 Up P2: $45 P2: $50 Player 1 P1: $50 P1: $60 Middle P2: $50 P2: $60 P1: $60 P1: $50 Down P2: $60 P2: $70 In the game shown above, list all of the Nash Equilibrium (please check ALL that apply) (up, left) (up, middle) (up, right) (middle, left) (middle, middle) (middle, right) (down, left) (down, middle) (down, right) No equilibrium Right P1: $45 P2: $60 P1: $50 P2: $70 P1: $60 P2: $60arrow_forwardAssume that two people are bargaining over how to split the surplus of their joint efforts, which total $100. The only difference between the two is that player A has an associated interest rate of 5 percent and player B has an associated interest rate of 20 percent. Based on Nash bargaining theory, what share of the $100 ill Player A wind up with? (Please provide your answer in $ style format)arrow_forward
- Dynamic Game: US Tax No Tax Fiji Fiji Tax No Tax Tax No Tax 10,000,10 9900,-9989 10,100,-89.990 Sub-game_1 10,000,-99,989 Sub-game_2 Sub-game_3 1. Is there a Nash Equilibrium of this game in which Fiji improves its payoffs relative to the Sub-game Perfect Nash equilibrium? If there is, explain carefully why this strategy profile is not a Sub-game Perfect Nash equilibrium.arrow_forwardSuppose that Lionel Messi is negotiating a contract with FC Barcelona. Messi has an offer from Real Madrid for $20 million a year. If he signs with FC Barcelona, they will earn $90 million in revenue from the signing. FC Barcelona's next best option is to sign Cristiano Ronaldo. They would earn $70 million from signing Ronaldo and would pay him a contract of $10 million. Messi's bargaining power is w = 1/2. a) What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FČ Barcelona's surplus? b) Due to an injury, FC Barcelona would only earn $50 million from signing Ronaldo but everything else remains the same. What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus?arrow_forwardIlia is driving home from work. She needs to buy gas and notices an Exxon-Mobil station on one side of the street and a Shell station on the other side of the street. Although run by different companies, the two stations sell gasoline at the same price. a. The most likely reason that the price is the same is that _gas stations always make a profit, so they can charge any price they want. _drivers need gas and are willing to pay whatever price a gas station charges. _government regulation requires both gas stations to charge the same price. _consumers view gasoline from different gas stations as perfect substitutes. b. If one station increases its price, _it will be fined by the government. _it will sell more gasoline. _it will make a higher profit. _it will lose customers to the cheaper station across the street.arrow_forward
- Don't use Aiarrow_forward3. Blackadder and Baldrick are rational, self-interested criminals imprisoned in separate cells in a dark medieval dungeon. They face the prisoner's dilemma displayed in the matrix. Assume that Blackadder is willing to pay $1,000 for each year by which he can reduce his sentence below 20 years. A corrupt jailer tells Blackadder that before he decides whether to confess or deny the crime, she can tell him Baldrick's decision. How much is this information worth to Blackadder? (LO2) Blackadder Confess Deny O for Baldrick Confess 5 years for each 20 years for Blackadder Baldrick 20 years for Baldrick Deny 1 year for each O for Blackadderarrow_forward17. Which of the following is an example of specific reciprocity? Group of answer choices (pick one) A.The US government thinks the Paris Climate accord is a bad deal, so it withdraws B.The European Union is unhappy that the US raised tariffs on steel, so it retaliates with tariffs on Harley-Davidson C.motorcycles and Kentucky bourbon D.For many years, WTO members refused to admit Russia to the WTO because its trade history suggested it was an unreliable trading partner E.All of the above F.None of the abovearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education