The following table shows the total costs for each of four firms (A,B,C, and D) to eliminate units of pollution from their production processes. For example, for Firm A to eliminate one unit of pollution, it would cost $40, and for Firm A to eliminate two units it would cost a total of $105. If the government charged a tax of $74 per unit of pollution, how many units of pollution would the firms eliminate altogether? Number of units Firm A Firm B Firm C Firm D eliminated

The following table shows the total costs for each of four firms (A,B,C, and D) to eliminate units of pollution from their production processes. For example, for Firm A to eliminate one unit of pollution, it would cost $40, and for Firm A to eliminate two units it would cost a total of $105. If the government charged a tax of $74 per unit of pollution, how many units of pollution would the firms eliminate altogether? Number of units Firm A Firm B Firm C Firm D eliminated

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Exercise 1.23: Challenging Question. The Mondevil Corporation operates a chemical plant, which is located on the banks of the Sacramento river. Downstream from the chemical plant is a group of fisheries. The Mondevil plant emits by- products that pollute the river, causing harm to the fisheries. The profit Mondevil obtains from operating the chemical plant is $II > 0. The harm inflicted on the fisheries due to water pollution is equal to $L > 0 of lost profit [without pollution the fisheries' profit is $A, while with pollution it is $(A - L)]. Suppose that the fisheries collectively sue the Mondevil Corporation. It is easily verified in court that Mondevil's plant pollutes the river. However, the values of II and L cannot be verified by the court, although they are commonly known to the litigants. Suppose that the court requires the Mondevil attorney (player 1) and the fisheries' attorney (player 2) to play the following litigation game. Player 1 is asked to announce a number x≥0,…
Use a graph to illustrate the quantity of pollution that would be emitted (a) after a corrective tax has been imposed and (b) after tradable pollution permits have been imposed. Could these two quantities ever be equivalent?
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $6. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $1 to $4, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $. Select one: a. $7.50. O b. $12. C. $3. O d. $4.5.
Question 3 Professor Paudel shows the graph for the case of negative externalities in the class. He wants the class to think about positive externalities as well. This got him thinking a lot about potential market failure due to positive production externality in the oil exploration market. Specifically, in his research, he found that expenditures on oil exploration by any company can have a positive externality because they offer more profitable opportunities for other companies. Professor Paudel wants you to enlighten him on the following issues: a) Graphically show private and social marginal cost functions and the demand curve. b) Under positive externalities as mentioned above, is the social marginal cost below than the private marginal cost? Explain and support your answers with the help of a clearly labeled graph. c) Under positive externalities as mentioned above, what's the relationship between social optimum quantity and the competitive market equilibrium quantity? Is there…
Can you explain why the following statement is false? The efficient level of a pollution-emitting activity (e.g., production of a good) is that at which the marginal external cost of pollution is equal to zero.
A confectioner and a music producer shares the same building. The confectioner uses machines while the music producer's productivity increases if there is less noise. The table below shows the benefits to the confectioner and the music producer. For example, if the confectioner installs an additional machine, her benefits increases to $100 while the benefits of the music producer reduces to $40. Coase argued that private solutions to externalities is possible between parties, is the confectioner wants to install the new machinery and noone has property rights, what is the maximum compensation possible? Enter your answers without any decimals. Benefits Вепefits Current Machine New Machine Confectioner 60 100 Music Producer 70 40
A city currently emits 16 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. The table below shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits. Emissions Total Cost Marginal Cost Total Benefit Marginal Benefit 16 MG Current N/A Current N/A 12 MG 50 800 8 MG 150 1300 4 MG 500 1650 0 MG 1200 1950 Complete the table. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. First Unit of Pollution Cost of Eliminating the... Second Unit of Pollution (Dollars) Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) Firm (Dollars) Firm X 80 100 150 Firm Y 450 800 1,050 Firm Z 95 120 200 Now,…
None
yn iru Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Cost of Eliminating the... Second Unit of Pollution First Unit of Pollution Firm (Dollars) (Dollars) Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 150 1,050 Firm X 80 100 800 450 Firm Y 200 Firm Z 120 95…
There are three industrial firms in a town Firm Initial Pollution Level Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 Unit A 30 units $20 40 units 20 units B с $30 $10 The government wants to reduce pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable pollution permits. 1. Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so. What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? 2. How much higher would the costs of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?
The primary source of air pollution in the small town of Smokey, Nevada is a nearby steel mill. The local environmental agency has decided that the mill needs to reduce its emissions because the town's population is located directly downwind from it. Currently the agency is considering three different approaches to reducing pollution from the mill: a technology standard, an emission standard and an emission tax. Why might the owner of the mill prefer an emission standard to a technology standard that would produce the same level of emissions? a Because with emission standards the polluter is more flexible in selecting the technology that will minimize her abatement cost Ob. Because polluters usually try to stick to their existing technology O C. Because it has been proven to be easier to implement O d. Because polluters, as all producers are suspicious about new technologies