
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
The article does not mention the costs involved with the imposition of a sugary tax. Illustrate, with the use of an appropriate figure, what the

Transcribed Image Text:Ourresults show that a 20% sugar tax would mean about 400,000 fewer people would be obese. Three-
quarters of these would be in the workforce, so that about 300,000 fewer employed people would be
obese.
Over the lifetime of the adult population of Australia in 2010, this would add about A$750 million to
the formal, paid economy, due to more, healthier people producing more goods and services.
The gains in unpaid work were even larger at A$1.17 billion. Fewer obese people means more healthy
people, who have a greater likelihood to do unpaid work, in the houschold or as volunteers.
These indirect economic benefits from increased employment in the workforce and from greater
participation in unpaid work were larger than the savings in health care costs, which we estimated at
about A$425 million over the lifetime of the adult population.
In all, the tax could deliver over A$2 billion in economic benefits in indirect cconomic benefits plus
health care savings. And that does not even include the value of the gains in people's quality of life
and how long they lived.
The exact size of the benefits depend on assumptions about what people would drink (and eat) if they
drink fewer sugared drinks. In this study, we used Australian evidence that found an increase only for
diet drinks, which contain virtually no energy.
Other evidence finds a sugar tax reduces the consumption of sugar and energy-rich foods, but may also
lead to people eating fewer fruit and vegetables and more salt. This would reduce the health benefit,
and that study suggests it would be even better to tax all sugar instead of only sugared drinks.

Transcribed Image Text:Article 1: Taxing sugary drinks would boost productivity, not iust health
Taken from: http://theconversation.com/taxing-sugary-drinks-would-boost-productivity-not-just-
health-79410
Many studies have looked at the potential benefits of a sugar tax in terms of the longer, healthier
lives and reduced health expenditure associated with tackling obesity.
But our new study goes one step further. It predicts that higher taxes on sugar-sweetened drinks will
benefit the wider economy through increased economic productivity, by having more, healthier people
in paid and unpaid work.
Obesity delivers a double whammy
A total of 63% Australian adults and one in four children are overweight or obese, making this both a
health and an economic problem.
Obesity increases the risk of diseases including cancer, diabetes, heart disease and stroke. Obesity has
also been estimated to cost Australia about A$8.6 billion a year or more. Not only does obesity drive
up health-care costs, by causing illness and premature death, it also reduces pecople's ability to work
and contribute to the economy.
Added sugar contributes energy to the diet, but no useful nutrients. Increasingly, health experts suggest
we should be treating sugar, and in particular sugar in soft drinks, as we do tobacco or alcohol, by
taxing it to reduce consumption and so reduce obesity rates.
Taxing sugar is not a new concept. In the 1700s, Scottish economist Adam Smith wrote in An Inquiry
into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations:
Sugar, rum, and tobacco, are commodities which are nowhere necessaries of life, which are
become objects of almost universal consumption, and which are therefore extremely proper
subjects of taxation.
Smith's proposal to tax sugar was not aimed at improving health, as it is today. Now organisations like
the World Health Organisation, the Australian Medical Association and many non-govemmental
organisations are advocating a tax on drinks with added sugar, as part of wider efforts to tackle obesity.
What we did and what we found
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps with 1 images

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Hey! so I am just so confused on how to draw this graph. we were kicked out of school before we got to this lesson. Any explanations!arrow_forwardConsider the following supply and demand curves Price = 35-4*Q Price = 3*Q Suppose the government places a 7-dollar tax on producers. Doing so would generate _____ dollars of revenue. Suppose now instead of putting a 7-dollar tax on producers, the government put the 7-dollar tax on consumers. Doing so would generate _______ dollars of revenue. In this case, consumers would pay _____ percent of the tax. Give typed answer ASAP with proper step by step explanation. Will give upvote only for the correct answer . Thank you .arrow_forwardNote: Once you enter a value in a white field, the graph and any corresponding amounts in each grey field will change accordingly. PRICE (Dollars per pack) 10 9 8 7 2 1 0 Supply Demand 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 QUANTITY (Packs) Suppose the government imposes a $2-per-pack tax on suppliers. At this tax amount, the equilibrium quantity of cigarettes is Graph Input Tool Market for Cigarettes Quantity (Packs) Demand Price (Dollars per pack) Tax (Dollars per pack) 40 6.00 2.00 Supply Price (Dollars per pack) packs, and the government collects $ ? 4.00 in tax revenue.arrow_forward
- Illustrate, with the use of an appropriate figure, what the deadweight loss from the imposition of a sugary tax would look like.arrow_forwardAssume that the monthly demand for Gala apple in the US is given by q=1200-300p and quantity is in million pounds. The monthly supply of Gala is q= -200+400p for p>$0.5. Now assume that the government has imposed a quantity tax equal to $0.14 on each pound of apple. What is the new equilibrium consumer price, producer price and quantity?arrow_forwardtax on buyersarrow_forward
- Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge beer producers a tax. Before the tax, 20 million cases of beer were sold every month at a price of $4 per case. After the tax, 13 million cases of beer are sold every month; consumers pay $7 per case, and producers receive $2 per case (after paying the tax). The amount of the tax on a case of beer is per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is per case, and the burden that falls on producers is per case. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been the same as if the tax had been levied on consumers. True Falsearrow_forwardThe daily demand and supply curves for milk in the small town of Dairyville are as shown in the figure. Suppose the government imposes a price ceiling on milk of $5 per gallon. a. How many gallons of milk will be bought and sold each day after the imposition of the price ceiling? gallons per day b. What will be the excess demand for milk each day after the imposition of the price ceiling? gallons per day c. What will be consumer surplus after the imposition of the price ceiling? $ per day d. What will be producer surplus after the imposition of the price ceiling? $ per day e. What will be the loss in total economic surplus each day that results from the imposition of the price ceiling? $ per dayarrow_forwardSuppose that the local government of Columbus decides to institute a tax on soda producers. Before the tax, 30 million liters of soda were sold every month at a price of $9 per liter. After the tax, 23 million liters of soda are sold every month; consumers pay $14 per liter, and producers receive $6 per liter (after paying the tax). The amount of the tax on a liter of soda is $ that falls on producers is $ per liter. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on consumers. True per liter. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $ False per liter, and the burdenarrow_forward
- Suppose that the local government of Santa Fe decides to institute a tax on soda consumers. Before the tax, 45,000 liters of soda were sold every week at a price of $10 per liter. After the tax, 38,000 liters of soda are sold every week; consumers pay $14 per liter (including the tax), and producers receive $8 per liter. The amount of the tax on a liter of soda is 3 that falls on producers is 5 per liter. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been the same as if the tax had been levied on producers. True per liter. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is 3 O False per liter, and the burdenarrow_forward(a) Suppose in a competitive market, the market demand curve for salt is infinitelyinelastic. What is the impact of a per-unit tax (i.e. a specific tax) on the priceof salt that consumers pay? Suppose the demand curve for butter is Q = 50 − 3P and the supply curve isQ = 2P. Suppose the government announces a per-unit tax of 1 on the priceof butter. Tax on butter can be seen as a ’fat tax’. What is the overall effectof a fat tax on the consumers? Please do not use chat gpt and answer the best way it can be.arrow_forwardWhen a tax of $1.00 per gallon is imposed on sellers of gasoline, the supply curve for gasoline shifts upward, but by less than $1.00. a. True b. Falsearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education