Take, for example, a piece of software that, over the internet, permits a surgeon in one area to perform surgery on a patient in another. And now that the program is over, who would want to keep going? What kind of destruction do they want to cause? To what extent would they look to your weaknesses in order to pull you down? Is it possible that damage may be caused by such vulnerabilities even if there were no hostile aggressor present?

Imagine a software that enables a surgeon to operate remotely on a patient who is in another country using just the internet. Why would anybody want to remain after the lights are out? How potentially damaging do they anticipate it to be? Which of your shortcomings do you believe they would highlight in an effort to cast doubt on you? Is it conceivable for harm to occur when there isn't a violent attacker there to exploit these vulnerabilities?

Consider a piece of software that, through the internet, permits one surgeon to perform surgery on a patient who is physically placed elsewhere. Why would anyone desire to continue after the curtain has fallen? How potentially harmful do they hope it will be? Which of your faults do you suppose they will stress in an attempt to discredit you? Is it plausible for damage to occur in the absence of a hostile aggressor aiming to exploit such vulnerabilities?

The fact that computer security is almost often considered as an afterthought rather than an integral part of the development process is one of the most significant problems associated with this aspect of the field. In the event that nothing further can be done, it is essential to express the ramifications.

What's the difference between taking a top-down strategy to information security and a bottom-up one?Because it is more effective to implement a method that works from the top down?

In your perspective, how risky is it to make use of such a program? Is there any chance that it may be harmful?

Consider a piece of software that, via the use of the internet, enables a surgeon in one location to assist in the performance of an operation in another. Who would sign up for this? What kind of harm do they plan to cause? In what ways may they hurt you? Are there circumstances in which such vulnerabilities might cause damage even in the absence of an active threat actor?

Give an example of how a full denial of service attack on a user (in which the user gets no response from the computer) results in a significant issue for that user. Another example is offered in which a 10% denial of service (that is, the user's computation advances but at a 10% slower pace than normal) is a significant issue for that user. Illegal access to a computer system may result in a 10% denial of service attack against legitimate users of that computing system. If so, how would you proceed?

Imagine if a virus were to be attached to an email and delivered to Jim, causing him to become infected. Can you describe this assault in terms of its vulnerabilities, dangers, and the perpetrators?

Imagine if Jim was going to be infected by a virus that was going to be attached to an email and sent to him. Can you talk about this attack in terms of vulnerabilities, threats, and the agents of those threats?