Consider software that lets a surgeon in one location to do surgery on a patient in a different location through the internet. Who wants to keep going once the programme is over? What kind of harm are they hoping to inflict? What flaws would they try to exploit in order to do you harm? Is it possible that such flaws might inflict harm even in the absence of a hostile attacker?

Suppose that a piece of online banking software has a secret feature that gives the developer access to the account details of any account with a balance of at least $10,000. This is a possible situation. Who knows what the implications may be if this is an attack?

Consider a piece of software that, through the internet, permits one surgeon to perform surgery on a patient who is physically placed elsewhere. Why would anyone desire to continue after the curtain has fallen? How potentially harmful do they hope it will be? Which of your faults do you suppose they will stress in an attempt to discredit you? Is it plausible for damage to occur in the absence of a hostile aggressor aiming to exploit such vulnerabilities?

Think about software that enables a surgeon in one area to operate online on a patient in a different location. Upon completion of the programme, who wants to continue? What kind of damage are they attempting to cause? What weaknesses would they attempt to use against you? Is it conceivable for these weaknesses to do damage even if there isn't a hostile attacker present?