in one location to help a patient in another over the internet. Who may assault the programme? What kind of damage do they aim to do? What weaknesses may they use to hurt you? Could the flaws inflict

Consider about software that allows surgeons to help each other remotely. Can anybody enrol? What damage do they intend? How can they hurt you? Can these weaknesses cause harm even without an attacker?

Imagine if Jim was going to be infected by a virus that was going to be attached to an email and sent to him. Can you talk about this attack in terms of vulnerabilities, threats, and the agents of those threats?

Think about software that enables a surgeon in one area to operate online on a patient in a different location. Upon completion of the programme, who wants to continue? What kind of damage are they attempting to cause? What weaknesses would they attempt to use against you? Is it conceivable for these weaknesses to do damage even if there isn't a hostile attacker present?

What's the difference between taking a top-down strategy to information security and a bottom-up one?Because it is more effective to implement a method that works from the top down?

Consider a piece of software that, via the use of the internet, enables a surgeon in one location to assist in the performance of an operation in another. Who would sign up for this? What kind of harm do they plan to cause? In what ways may they hurt you? Are there circumstances in which such vulnerabilities might cause damage even in the absence of an active threat actor?

Give an example of how a full denial of service attack on a user (in which the user gets no response from the computer) results in a significant issue for that user. Another example is offered in which a 10% denial of service (that is, the user's computation advances but at a 10% slower pace than normal) is a significant issue for that user. Illegal access to a computer system may result in a 10% denial of service attack against legitimate users of that computing system. If so, how would you proceed?

Imagine if a virus were to be attached to an email and delivered to Jim, causing him to become infected. Can you describe this assault in terms of its vulnerabilities, dangers, and the perpetrators?

Imagine if Jim was going to be infected by a virus that was going to be attached to an email and sent to him. Can you talk about this attack in terms of vulnerabilities, threats, and the agents of those threats?

Consider software that lets one surgeon operate on a patient remotely through the internet. After the curtain falls, why would anybody want to continue? They want it to be how dangerous? How will they try to discredit you? Is harm possible without a violent aggressor?