Suppose the economy is in equilibrium at point B which is below the full-employment output of point D. If the government implements fiscal policy targeted at moving real GDP back to point D, but crowding out significantly reduces the effectiveness of the fiscal policy, the equilibrium point will likely end up closer to point   Multiple Choice A B C D

Suppose you are given the following information. Autonomous spending is at $3000, government spending is at $4000, investment spending is at $2000, net exports are $1000, taxes are set at $3000 and the mpc is .8 or 80%. What is the equilibrium level of output? What would happen if the government tried to balance the budget? The other day, it was announced the consumer confidence was up last month. This sounded good news bells for firms. Why? What would be affected in our equation above? Why would it matter? Suppose the government tried to balance the budget my cutting spending, what would be the equilibrium level of output? If there is “crowding out (or in)”, what else might change in your equation? What impact would that have

On the following graph, AD1 represents the initial aggregate demand curve in a hypothetical economy, and AS represents the initial aggregate supply curve. The economy's full-employment output is $12 billion. On the following graph, use the grey point (star symbol) to mark the equilibrium. (Note: You will not be graded on any adjustments made to the graph.) PRICE LEVEL (CPI) 106 105 104 103 102 H AS 1ŏ1 101 ADA 100 AD 3 99 AD 2 98 AD1 97 Full Employment 96 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 REAL GDP (Billions of dollars) Equilibrium (?)

Based on our understanding of the model presented in Ch3, a 5% tax cut in a country with balanced budget will cause an increase in equilibrium output? TRUE OR FALSE

in another economy, the MPC = 4/5, government needs to increase expenditures $20 to complete a project, but it does not want to increase debt so it increases taxes $20 also. What, if any, will be the change in output generated by this balanced - budget expenditure scenario?

Which of the following would not be considered an automatic stabilizer?   Question 13 options:   Income tax   Unemployment compensation   Education spending   Food stamps

a) What are the three fiscal policy tools and how would each be used to counter a contractionary gap? b) True or False and explain: Fiscal Policy is effective at reducing the duration of an economic contraction. c) If the spending multiplier is 2.5 and the economy is in a $500 billion contractionary gap, how much should I increase government purchases to eliminate the gap? d) Continuing with c, if the MPC is 0.8, how much would I need to increase transfer payments to eliminate the $500 billion contractionary gap? e) True or False and explain: Households always react to tax changes in a predictable manner. Module 6: Deficits and the Debt. a) Distinguish between deficit and debt. b) Explain what crowding out is and why it reduces the impact of fiscal stimulus. c) True or false and explain: The national debt represents a threat of bankruptcy. (For d and e) Suppose the interest on the debt was $600 billion. If interest is paid domestically, 90% will be spent domestically (the remainder is…

Which of the following is an example of an automatic stabilizer? tax rates the MPC the amount of dollars collected in taxes interest rates

Consider a hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.80 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.20. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for the economy is______, and the spending multiplier for the economy is______. suppose the government in this economy decides to decrease the government purchases by $300 billion. The decrease in government purchases will lead to a decrease in income generating an initial change in consumption equal to______. This decreases income yet again, causing a second change in consumption equal to_______. the total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending is_____________. The following graph shows that aggregate demand curve (AD1) for this economy before the change in government spending. Use the green line (triangle symbol) to plot the new aggregate demand curve (AD2) after the spending multiplier effect takes place. Hint: be sure that the new aggregate demand curve (AD2) is parallel…

Suppose actual real GDP is $5.49 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.48 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.76. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.07 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap?  (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)