ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Juanita is deciding whether to buy a suit that she wants, as well as where to buy it. Three stores carry the same suit, but it is more convenient for Juanita to get to some stores than others. For example, she can go to her local store, located 15 minutes away from where she works, and pay a marked-up price of $129 for the suit:
Store
|
Travel Time Each Way
|
Price of a Suit
|
---|---|---|
(Minutes)
|
(Dollars per suit)
|
|
Local Department Store | 15 | 129 |
Across Town | 30 | 86 |
Neighboring City | 60 | 63 |
Juanita makes $50 an hour at work. She has to take time off work to purchase her suit, so each hour away from work costs her $50 in lost income. Assume that returning to work takes Juanita the same amount of time as getting to a store and that it takes her 30 minutes to shop. As you answer the following questions, ignore the cost of gasoline and depreciation of her car when traveling.
Complete the following table by computing the opportunity cost of Juanita's time and the total cost of shopping at each location.
Store
|
Opportunity Cost of Time
|
Price of a Suit
|
Total Cost
|
---|---|---|---|
(Dollars)
|
(Dollars per suit)
|
(Dollars)
|
|
Local Department Store |
|
129 |
|
Across Town |
|
86 |
|
Neighboring City |
|
63 |
|
Assume that Juanita takes opportunity costs and the price of the suit into consideration when she shops. Juanita will minimize the cost of the suit if she buys it from the .
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Your own a chocolate producing company which can advertise on both television (T) and internet(I). The effect of TV and online commercials on sales is again given byS(T,I) = 500 + 48T−6T2+ 112I−6I2+ 4TI. You have a budget of $25 that you can spend on T and I. The price of aTV commercial is $12per unit and the price of an online commercial is also $12 per unit. 1. Determine the optimal level of TV commercials T and online commercials I if you have to spend all of your budget. You should provide two methods to solve this, by direct substitution and by setting up the Lagrangian. Is the Lagrange multiplier positive or negative? Give an intuitive interpretation of why this is the case? 2. Now determine the optimal level of TV commercials T and online commercials I if you DO NOT have to spend all of your budget. Do you obtain the same answer as subquestion 5.1? What is the Lagrange multiplier equal to in this case? Discuss.arrow_forward1. Dave Grohl wants to buy drums and guitars. Drums are sold in an unusual way. There is only one supplier, and the more drums you buy from him, the higher the price you have to pay per unit. In fact, y units of drums will cost Dave y² dollars. Guitars are sold in the usual way at a price of 2 dollars per unit. Dave's income is 20 dollars, and his utility function is U (x,y) = x+2y, where x is his consumption of guitars and y is his consumption of drums. A. Sketch Dave's budget set and shade its in. B. Sketch some of his indifference curves and label the point that he chooses. C. Calculate the number of drums and guitars that Dave demands at these prices and this income.arrow_forwardEmi's friend Xindi also likes tacos, but she doesn't like sandwiches. Instead, she always consumes exactly two tacos (good x) with one glass of horchata (y), and she doesn't enjoy either good without the other. Suppose prices are the same as initially in problem 1, so that horchata is twice as expensive as tacos (Px=$2, Py=$4), and Xindi has the same budget as Emi: I=$24 a) Propose a utility function that is consistent with these preferences and draw a couple of its isoquants. b) Solve Xindi's long run utility maximization to find the basket of goods she will purchase. c) What if, just as in problem 1, the good on the x axis goes on sale for $1/ unit?arrow_forward
- In the quaint village of Chromaville, all of the residents (including their mayor) are colorblind. The mayor is decorating all the village's lampposts before their annual year-end holiday parade. She has $180 to spend on ribbon. A yard of green ribbon costs $1.50 (per yard). A yard of red ribbon costs $1.25. However, there is a sale on this week: If you buy two yards of green ribbon at the regular price, you get an additional yard of green ribbon for free! a. If yards of red ribbon are measured along the horizontal axis and yards of green ribbon are measured along the vertical axis, what is the slope of the mayor's budget constraint (during the sale)? b. What is the slope of the mayor's indifference curves (if she cannot tell the difference between red and green ribbon)? C. How many yards of red and green ribbon will the mayor purchase (during the sale)?arrow_forwardEvery month, a family of three spends $2,000 on food (F) and other items (O). The family’s preferences are represented by the utility function U(F,O) = F1/5O4/5. The unit price of food and the unit price of other items are both $1. Find this family’s monthly food expenditure.The family could join a consumers’ club. At the club, food costs 20% less than in other stores (i.e., at the food club PF = $0.8)arrow_forwardU.S. food markets consumers viewed beef as a normal good from 1960-1976, but viewed it as an inferior good after that point. This type of change is not abnormal, in that as average household incomes rise, preferences might change. For instance, as households move from poor to middle-class, their consumption of beef might increase. However, as households move from middle- class to upper-middle-class, they might choose to purchase more exotic foods products. Assuming you are a beef producer in 1983, what will happen if incomes continue to increase? a. The marginal cost of beef will increase. b. The marginal cost of beef will decrease. c. The demand for beef will increase. d. The demand for beef will decrease.arrow_forward
- You have preferences u(x,y) = xy over games (X) and videos (Y) you can buy on a platform and a $360 budget, with prices px = 9 and py = 6. How much would you be willing to pay (at most) as a subscription fee for each of the following plans (you can buy any amount of Y in each plan at the original price, unless otherwise stated): (a) Plan A : You can buy (any amount of) X at a discounted price px = 4(b) Plan B : You are given 40 units of X for free, but you cannot buy any more of X. (surely can buy any amount of Y)(c) Plan C : You are given 30 units of X for free, but you cannot buy any more of X; you also have a discounted price for good Y; py = 4.arrow_forwardKimberly has $1,000 per year to spend between $50 concert tickets and $200 per night getaways. Her utility maximizing combination is 8 concerts and 3 overnight getaways. She recently received a promotion on her job and now she can spend up to $2000 per year on these two items. Her new utility maximizing combination will depend in part on what? Group of answer choices The substitution effect. The income effect. The degree to which concerts and overnight getaways are normal goods or inferior goods. The fact that concerts and getaways are fungible goods.arrow_forwardConsider the following money lotteries: ?1=(5/6,3000;1/6,500) ?2=(2/3,3000;1/3,500) ?3=(1/4,3000;1/4,2000;1/4,1000;1/4,500) ?4=(1/2,2000;1/2,1000) Leslie says that she is indifferent between lottery ?1 and getting $2000 for sure is indifferent between lottery ?2 and getting $1000 for sure prefers lottery ?3 over lottery ?4 Explain carefully whether or not Leslie is rational according to the theory of expected utility.arrow_forward
- Fang likes playing badminton with her friends. Her utility function for playing badminton every week is given by U(t) = 11t – 2t2, where t is measured in hours. They play on a badminton court, which they can rent per hour. Suppose the current price to play on the badminton court is £2.50 per hour. How many hours should Fang play if she wishes to maximise her utility? Explain what we mean by the principle of diminishing marginal utility. Does the principle apply in Fang’s case? Explain why. In a diagram with income in pound sterling on the horizontal axis and quantity on the vertical axis, show the relationship between Fang’s budget and the number of hours that would maximise her consumer surplus.arrow_forwardDean likes to practice guitar in his apartment, working primarily on mastering old Velvet Underground songs. Because he’s sure that developing guitar prowess will lead to riches – or at least critical acclaim in indie circles – he derives $500 in surplus from being able to practice. Dean’s practicing, however, is quite loud and can be heard clearly through paper-thin walls in his hip Brooklyn apartment. Britta lives next door and likes to read, but she is unable to do so when Dean plays guitar. She gets $350 in surplus from the satisfaction of reading. Suppose that when Dean and Britta bargain, they always split any surplus to be divided evenly. Assume that it’s common knowledge that courts always overestimate damages by $200, and transaction costs are $50. Given these assumptions, which of the following legal rules is most efficient: Assuming the same information from Question 28 above, what would be the most efficient tax to levy on Dean’s playing? A. $200 B.…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education