
Concept explainers
Question 17
Suppose Carole has a total wealth of $100,000 and a utility described by U = E -A She has a risk aversion coefficient of A-1. She can borrow and lend/invest at the risk-free rate of 2.8%. Suppose the optimal risky portfolio has an expected return of 12% and a standard deviation of 27.5%, What is her optimal amount to borrow or lend/invest at the risk free rate? Indicate investing/lending as a positive number and borrowing as a negative number. Round to the nearest cent ($0.01). Your answer should not include the $ sign. If your answer is $25.34, it should be written as 25.34.
Question 18
Ayear ago, an investor bought 200 shares of a "no-load" mutual fund at $10.01 per share. No-load funds do not change "entry fees or "exit" fees when buying or redeeming shares. Sometime during the year, the fund paid dividends of $0.71 per share and the fund paid capital gains of $0.14 per share - and these payments were reinvested in the fund at an average price of $10.73 per share (fractional shares are allowed - no need to round to the closest whole number of shares). If the investor sells her shares in the fund for the NAV of the fund, $11.86, what is the investor's holding period return (HPR? Assume no transaction costs and no taxes. Remember - Your answer must be in decimal form, not percent. If the answer is 8:3333:%, then answer 0.0833. Round to 4 decimal places

Step by stepSolved in 3 steps

- 13. A standard logistic regression models the effect of age (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60- 69) on experience of back pain (modeling yes vs. no). If age is included as a continuous covariate (with values 1, 2, 3, etc., as scores) and the regression parameter associated with age is estimated to be 0.21 with standard error of 0.08, what are the odds of backpain for a 35-year-old (e.g., in the 30-39 range) relative to the odds for a 25-year-old? Enter your answer to two numbers after the decimal place.arrow_forward12) The following results are an autoregression for US Exports to Mexico where the dependent variable is the lagged value of US Exports. a) Fill in the table b)Based on these regression results, what is your forecast of US Exports to Mexico for March 2005? c) Which of the two forecasts do you think is more accurate? Explain.arrow_forward13. In the regression equation Log(Cars_Sold) = 1500 + 2.3*Advertisement, what is the most appropriate interpretation of the slope coefficient? OA. a. $1 increase in advertisement, increases cars sold by 230% O B. b. $1 increase in advertisement increases cars sold by 2.3 OC. c. 1% increase in advertisement increases cars sold by 0.023 OD. d. 1% increase in advertisement increases cars sold by 230%arrow_forward
- 1. It has been noted that there is a positive correlation between the U.S. economy and the height of women's hemlines (distance from the floor of the bottom of a skirt or dress) with shorter skirts corresponding to economic growth and lower hemlines to periods of economic recession. Comment on the conclusion that economic factors cause hemlines to rise and fall. # of Absences (in weeks) Exam Grade 1 2 345 23 014 90 85 95 92 80arrow_forwardThe figure below illustrates monthly data over 10 years. What method would you expect would perform the best at forecasting the data series in period 121? Explain the (i) strengths of your selected method for this data and the (ii) weaknesses of alternative methods for this data. Consider the concepts of level, seasonality, trend, and noise in your answer.arrow_forward17. A risk manager would like to simulate the price of a stock using the discretized GBM, where St+At = St + µS{At+√ã$£€ where μ and o denote, respectively, the stock annual mean return and annual volatility. The data suggest that the weekly mean return on the stock is 0.5% and the weekly volatility is 4%. Assuming a weekly time step of At = 1/52 (in terms of annual units), what is the appropriate estimate of μ? (a) = 26.4% (b) û = 30.16% (c) û = 4.5% (d) û = 17.94% 18. Suppose that the price of an asset obeys geometric Brownian motion (GBM) with an annual drift μ = 0.01 and an annual volatility of o= 0.25. If today's price is $100, what is the probability that the price two years from now will drop below $80? Hint: Recall that under GBM, the future price at T, i.e. ST, given today's spot price, St, is with TT-t and €~ = (a) 21.51% (b) 35.48% (c) 51.1% (d) 30.47% ST= St x exp (μ x exp [(μ-27 ) XT + √F X 0 Xe] N (0, 1).arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





