part C and D needed only Consider the Production Possibility Frontiers of two countries, Australia and Brazil. Assume both have linear PPFs and the two countries both produce the same two goods: fruits and grain. Given its resources, Australia can produce either 2 units of grain per day or 1 unit of fruits; Brazil can produce either 5 units of grain or 4 units of fruits. (You may, for your own use, find it helpful to draw the Production Possibilities Frontiers for each country, though these won't be included in the answers you provide in you online responses.) a. If there were no trade, what would be the local price of fruits in each country, measured in units of grain? b. If trade is allowed, which country will export fruits and which country will export grain (if any)? c. What are the gains from trading a unit of fruit if the international price of fruit is equal to the average of the local prices in the two countries? d. How are the gains from trade distributed? Comment on why the benefits of trade are split between the two countries in this way.

If a PPF is "bowed outward" from the origin, then which of the following can be true? (check all that apply) The opportunity cost of producing another unit of the good on the y-axis decreases in terms of foregoing units of the good on the x-axis that are given up. The opportunity cost of producing another unit of the good on the x-axis increases in terms of foregoing units of the good on the y-axis that are given up. Inputs may be specialized for different uses Each unit of labor isn't equally productive in producing every unit of each good

Answer the attached question

Suppose Country A can produce 200 tons of capital-intensive goods or 200 tons of labor-intensive goods in one day.  Suppose Country B can produce 80 tons of capital-intensive goods or 160 tons of labor-intensive goods in one day. What is one possible price of capital-intensive goods (in terms of labor-intensive goods) that would make BOTH countries better off as the result of trade?

Unsure how to solve properly

0:25:00 13 of Lauren and Andrew can produce cherries or papayas. If they spent their day on producing either of the two goods, Lauren can produce up to 30 cherries or 10 papayas and Andrew can produce up to 50 cherries or 10 papayas. Lauren's opportunity cost of producing 1 papaya is Andrew's opportunity cost of producing 1 papaya is Lauren has the comparative advantage in advantage in → papaya. ◆ cherries. ◆ cherries. and Andrew has the comparative Lauren and Andrew can gain from trading if the price falls between → cherries for 1 Lauren and Andrew can produce cherries or papayas. If they spent their day on producing either ond Androw can produce

Because of conflict and instability in Country X, millions of its citizens emigrate to Country Y. Which of the following best explains what will happen to Country Y's production possibilities curve (PPC)? A C E It will move to a point on its PPC at which it produces only consumer goods B It's PPC will not change, but consumption of goods will decrease Its PPC will shift outward over time-- D It will move to a point inside its PPC, indicating slower growth Its PPC will shift inward over time

The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Maldonia and Lamponia. Both countries produce lemons and tea, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 12 million pounds of lemons and 6 million pounds of tea, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. TEA (Millions of pounds) 32 28 226 24 PPF 20 16 12 28 Maldonia 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) 28 32 22 ? TEA (Millions of pounds) 32 22 28 24 20 16 12 PPF Lamponia A 0 04 8 12 16 20 24 28 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) 32 ? Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of production of while Lamponia has a comparative advantage in the . Suppose that Maldonia and Lamponia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a million pounds of comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of Jemons million pounds of tea and

An examination of the Ricardian model of comparative advantage yields the clear result that trade is (potentially) beneficial for each of the two trading partners since it allows for an expanded consumption choice for each. However, for the world as a whole the expansion of production of one product must involve a decrease in the availability of the other, so that it is not clear that trade is better for the world as a whole as compared to an initial situation of non-trade (but efficient production in each country ?

Suppose Russia produces only cars and trucks. The resources that are used in the production of these two goods are not specialized—that is, the same set of resources is equally useful in producing both trucks and cars.   The shape of Russia's production possibilities frontier (PPF) should reflect the fact that as Russia produces more trucks and fewer cars, the opportunity cost of producing each additional truck _______?   The following graphs show two possible PPFs for Russia's economy: a straight-line PPF (PPF1PPF1) and a bowed-out PPF (PPF2PPF2). Based on the previous description, the trade-off Russia faces between producing trucks and cars is best represented by _____?