Consider two countries, Korea and Malaysia, and two goods, lumber and automobiles. Korea’s PPF is biased towards automobiles, and Malaysia’s PPF is biased towards lumber. They have the normal, concave to origin, increasing opportunity cost shape.1. Draw the PPFs of both countries with lumber on the horizontal axis.2. Illustrate the autarky equilibria in both countries given our strong assumption about preferences (e.g. consumption in both countries always lies on the same line from the origin).

When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Candonia and Lamponia. Both countries produce grain and sugar, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of grain and 12 million pounds of sugar, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 64 56 48 PPF 40 32 24 16 8 0 0 8 Candonia 16 24 32 40 48 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) 56 64 (?) SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0 PPF ———— 0 8 Lamponia A 16 24 32 40 48 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) 56 64 ? Candonia has a comparative advantage in the production of sugar while Lamponia has a comparative advantage in the grain production of ▼ . Suppose that Candonia and Lamponia…

Suppose countries A and B produce and consume (assuming convex preferences) apples and bananas using only labour. Unit labour cost for apples in country A are 2 and 1 in country B. Unit labour cost for bananas are 5 in country A and 4 in country B. The labour force is the same in both countries, and given by 100 in each country. Which three of the following statements are true?       Each country has an absolute advantage.     Allowing for international trade, the production of 100 apples and 20 bananas can occur in a global market equilibrium, but not in a market equilibria under autarky.     Country A will produce apples, with or without international trade.     Under autarky, the relative price for apples (price for apples/price for bananas) equals 0.4 in country A and 0.25 in country B.     Country B has an absolute advantage in producing bananas.     Allowing for international trade, the production of 60 apples and 40 bananas is feasible, but…

Draw a new curve, on the same graph,reflecting what the PPC might look like if new production technology is invented to speed up production in just the Jade Citrus Mint Tea industry.  Combination Jade Citrus Mint Tea (X axis) Spiced Apple Cider (Y axis) A 0 50 B 16 45 C 30 35 D 40 20 E 47 0

If a PPF is "bowed outward" from the origin, then which of the following can be true? (check all that apply) The opportunity cost of producing another unit of the good on the y-axis decreases in terms of foregoing units of the good on the x-axis that are given up. The opportunity cost of producing another unit of the good on the x-axis increases in terms of foregoing units of the good on the y-axis that are given up. Inputs may be specialized for different uses Each unit of labor isn't equally productive in producing every unit of each good

When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFS) for Yosemite and Congares. Both countries produce corn and lentils, each initially (ie, before specialization and trade) producing 6 million pounds of corn and 3 million pounds of lentils, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. LENTILS (MEns of pounds 0 0 194 2 Yout 4 10 CORN (Mof pounds) 14 16 LENTILS (Mons of pounds 0 2 Yosemite has a comparative advantage in the production of production of comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of comm. Conger L 10 12 COHN (Mof pounds) 14 16 (?) conn while Congaree has a comparative advantage in the -Suppose that Yosemite and Congaree specialize in the production…

Unsure how to solve properly

When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFs) for Candonia and Sylvania. Both countries produce lemons and coffee, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of lemons and 12 million pounds of coffee, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A.   Candonia has a comparative advantage in the production of    , while Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the production of    . Suppose that Candonia and Sylvania specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of   million pounds of lemons and   million pounds of coffee.   Suppose that Candonia and…

Assume that Germany has 1200 units of labor available and it can produce two goods: apples and bananas. The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2. France has a labor force of 800. Foreign's unit labor requirement in apple production is 5, while in banana production it is 1. a) Graph both countries' PPF. Clearly state which trade theory you are using and explain the reason. Note that the shape of the production possibility frontier depends on the theory. b) Show relative autarky price in Germany and France country. c) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of apple? Why?

Draw a new curve, on the same graph, reflecting what the PPC might look like if new production technology is invented to speed up production in both industries. Combination Bananas metric tons (X axis) Coffee metric tons (Y axis) A 20,000 0 B 18,000 11,000 C 14,000 20,000 D 8,000 27,000 E 0 30,000