New York City is evaluating the construction of a new train station to serve a new high-speed rail system. The Capital Projects Team is responsible for evaluating whether the project is economically acceptable. The Capital Projects Team estimates that the new train station will generate $1B in annual revenue, and provide $1B a year in cost savings. The new train line will cannibalize some of the existing revenues the City receives from its current train system. The value of this cannibalization is estimated at $500 MM a year. The new station's costs of Maintenance and Operation are anticipated to amount to be $250 MM per year. The initial investment required to design and build the train station is expected to be $15 B. New York City is considered to be a high credit and can borrow long-term in the capital markets at a rate of 6%. The Capital Projects Team evaluates these types of projects over a study period of 25 years. What is the Modified B/C Ratio? 0.94 1.00 1.07 1.10

New York City is evaluating the construction of a new train station to serve a new high-speed rail system. The Capital Projects Team is responsible for evaluating whether the project is economically acceptable. The Capital Projects Team estimates that the new train station will generate $1B in annual revenue, and provide $1B a year in cost savings. The new train line will cannibalize some of the existing revenues the City receives from its current train system. The value of this cannibalization is estimated at $500 MM a year. The new station's costs of Maintenance and Operation are anticipated to amount to be $250 MM per year. The initial investment required to design and build the train station is expected to be $15 B. New York City is considered to be a high credit and can borrow long-term in the capital markets at a rate of 6%. The Capital Projects Team evaluates these types of projects over a study period of 25 years. What is the Modified B/C Ratio? 0.94 1.00 1.07 1.10

Name: New York City is evaluating the construction of a new train station t
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:50:59.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: New York City is evaluating the construction of a new train station to serve a newhigh-speed rail system. The Capital Projects Team is responsible for evaluatingwhether the project is economically acceptable. The Capital Projects Team estimatesthat

Financial And Managerial Accounting

15th Edition

ISBN:9781337902663

Author:WARREN, Carl S.

Publisher:WARREN, Carl S.

Chapter26: Capital Investment Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5MAD: Home Garden Inc. is considering the construction of a distribution warehouse in West Virginia to...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

GoG is considering two alternative proposals to improve road safety and reduce traffic congestion in city “A”: (a) constructing a new bypass or (b) upgrading existing roadways. The Bypass Proposal will have an initial cost of GHC60 million and annual maintenance costs of GHC2.25 million. It is expected to yield benefits of GHC9.75 million per year. The Upgrading Proposal has an initial cost of GHC7 million, annual maintenance costs of GHC262,500 and annual social benefits of GHC1.14 million. Each project has a life of 30 years. The Bypass Proposal, which would have donor funding component, involves a discount rate of 8% while the Upgrading Proposal, to be funded wholly by government, has a discount rate of 4%. i. Calculatethenetpresentvalueofeachproposalanddetermineifit is economically viable ii. Which of the two proposals is more economically justifiable.
A city is analyzing two alternatives for generating electricity. The first is the construction of a hydroelectric dam with an investment of $200 million and an annual cost of $2 million for operation and maintenance. The life span of the dam is so great that it can be considered infinite. The second alternative consists of generating electricity from a gas plant, whose lifetime is 20 years. The initial investment required is $40 million and the annual cost of operation and maintenance is $6 million. The minimum attractive rate of real return is 5% per annum. Compare and calculate the Net Present Value of the resulting savings
A toll bridge across the Mississippi River is being considered as a replacement for the current I-40 bridge linking Tennessee to Arkansas. Because this bridge, if approved, will become a part of the U.S. Interstate Highway system, the B–C ratio method must be applied in the evaluation. Investment costs of the structure are estimated to be $17,500,000, and $325,000 per year in operating and maintenance costs are anticipated. In addition, the bridge must be resurfaced every fifth year of its 30-year projected life at a cost of $1,250,000 per occurrence (no resurfacing cost in year 30). Revenues generated from the toll are anticipated to be $2,500,000 in its first year of operation, with a projected annual rate of increase of 2.25 % per year due to the anticipated annual increase in traffic across the bridge. Assuming zero market (salvage) value for the bridge at the end of 30 years and aMARR of 10% per year, should the toll bridge be constructed ?
A toll bridge across the Mississippi River is being considered as a replacement for the current I-40 bridge linking Tennessee to Arkansas. Because this bridge, if approved, will become a part of the U.S. Interstate Highway system, the B-C ratio method must be applied in the evaluation. Investment costs of the structure are estimated to be $17,700,000, and $331,000 per year in operating and maintenance costs are anticipated. In addition, the bridge must be resurfaced every sixth year of its 30-year projected life at a cost of $1,120,000 per occurrence (no resurfacing cost in year 30). Revenues generated from the toll are anticipated to be $2,600,000 in its first year of operation, with a projected annual rate of increase of 2.25% per year due to the anticipated annual increase in traffic across the bridge. Assuming zero market (salvage) value for the bridge at the end of 30 years and a MARR of 7% per year, should the toll bridge be constructed? Also, assume that the initial surfacing of…
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal, but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would cost $240 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $80 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $84 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk-adjusted WACC is 17%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation. b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation? Why or why not?
The Mayor of Chicago is considering two rail transportation projects that you have been asked to evaluate. The first project is for locomotive modifications to improve fuel efficiency across the Chicago regional freight rail network. The project benefits come from fuel cost savings. The second investment project is for Chicago passenger rail infrastructure enhancements such as adding second set of tracks at congested network locations. The Mayor assumes this increased capacity will boost ticket and pass sales and those benefits are shown below. Both projects would provide benefit to the city for the next 30 years. Based upon the level of investment risk, the city Treasurer has suggested that financing could be secured at an annual rate of 7%. A number of alternatives have been developed for each project. The lump sum of the initial cash outlay and the ongoing monthly benefits have been estimated for each alternative and are shown in the following tables: Freight Rail Network Monthly…
The city engineer and economic development directors are evaluating two sites for construction of a multipurpose sports arena. The sites are downtown (DT) and southwest (SW) of the metropolitan area. The city already owns enough land at the DT site; however, th land for a parking garage will cost $1 million, and construction costs will be $10 million for the parking garage, infrastructure relocatie and drainage. The SW site is 30 km from downtown, but the land will be donated by a developer who knows that an arena at this sit will dramatically increase the value of the remainder of his land holdings. Because of its centralized location, there will be greater attendance at most of the events held at the DT site. This will result in more revenue to vendors and local merchants in the amount $550,000 per year. Additionally, the average attendee will not have to travel as far, resulting in annual benefits of $400,000 per yea All other costs and revenues are expected to be the same at either…
The city engineer and economic development directors are evaluating two sites for construction of a multipurpose sports arena. The sites are downtown (DT) and southwest (SW) of the metropolitan area. The city already owns enough land at the DT site; however, the land for a parking garage will cost $1 million, and construction costs will be $10 million for the parking garage, infrastructure relocation, and drainage. The SW site is 30 km from downtown, but the land will be donated by a developer who knows that an arena at this site will dramatically increase the value of the remainder of his land holdings. Because of its centralized location, there will be greater attendance at most of the events held at the DT site. This will result in more revenue to vendors and local merchants in the amount of $700,000 per year. Additionally, the average attendee will not have to travel as far, resulting in annual benefits of $400,000 per year. All other costs and revenues are expected to be the same…
S T m Computer Disk Duplicators, Inc. has been considering several capital investment proposals for the year beginning in 2022. For each investment proposal, the relevant cash flows and other relevant financial data are summarized in the table below. New assets will be depreciated under the MACRS system rather than being fully expensed right away. In the case of a replacement decision, the total installed cost of the equipment will be partially offset by the sale of existing equipment. The firm is subject to a 40 percent tax rate on ordinary income and on long-term capital gains. The firm's cost of capital is 15 percent. Type of Capital Budgeting Decision OA. $34,400 OB. $66,400 1 Expansion OC. $80,000 OD. $13,600 Type of Project Cost of new asset Installation costs MACRS (new asset) Original cost of old asset Purchase date (old asset) Sale proceeds (old asset) MACRS (old asset) Annual net profits before depreciation & taxes (old) Annual net profits before depreciation & taxes (new)…
The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting, grinding, and packing plant. The two alternatives are (1) a conveyor system with a high initial cost but low annual operating costs and (2) several forklift trucks, which cost less but have considerably higher operating costs. The decision to construct the plant has already been made, and the choice here will have no effect on the overall revenues of the project. The cost of capital for the plant is 6%, and the projects' expected net costs are listed in the following table: a. What is the IRR of each alternative? The IRR of alternative 1 is -Select- Alternative 2: $ Which method should be chosen? The IRR of alternative 2 is -Select- b. What is the present value of costs of each alternative? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest dollar. Use a minus sign to enter negative values, if any. Alternative 1: $ -Select- Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 should be chosen. Expected…
The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting, grinding, and packing plant. The two alternatives are (1) a conveyor system with a high initial cost but low annual operating costs and (2) several forklift trucks, which cost less but have considerably higher operating costs. The decision to construct the plant has already been made, and the choice here will have no effect on the overall revenues of the project. The cost of capital for the plant is 7%, and the projects' expected net costs are listed in the following table: Expected Net Cost Year Conveyor Forklift 0 -$500,000 -$200,000 1 -120,000 -160,000 2 -120,000 -160,000 3 -120,000 -160,000 4 -120,000 -160,000 5 -20,000 -160,000 What is the IRR of each alternative? The IRR of alternative 1 is -Select-undefined 5% 7% 9% Item 1 . The IRR of…
Seattle is attempting to revive its NBA team. Seattle is planning to build a new stadium that will costP250 billion. Annual upkeep is expected to amount to P8,000,000. The turf will have to be replaced every 10 years at a cost of P9,500,000.Painting every 5 years will cost P750,000. If the city expects to maintain the facility indefinitely, what is the estimated capitalized cost at i = 8%per year?