Scenario You are the audit engagement partner at A Ltd, a small firm of public accountants. You were recently appointed as auditor to a local company named B Ltd. The previous auditors, Z & Co, had resigned due to having so few audit clients that it was no longer commercially viable for the firm to retain its registered public accounting firm opportunity for your firm to take on the client and you and your fellow audit client in what was proving to be a difficult business environment. Times were well aware that redundancies were not out of the status. This had provided the v partners were delighted to be gaining an inly tough and you were question if more work was not picked up quickly. You had met Mr X, B Ltd.'s Managing Director (MD), at various local events and had a good personal relationship good reputation in was involved a You believed that this was a good client to win and, with Mr X's considerable business connections, this might not be the only audit client that you would pick up in the coming months. Mr X had assured you that a good working pack ( Audit Fee) would be prepared by his newly installed finance director (FD) to support the figures in the draft financial statements. Additionally, the client would arrange for was not picked up with him, Mr X was someone with a very community and of charitable fundraising activities. the local business final publication accounts. Six months down the line, you are sitting at your desk reviewing the audit working papers of B Ltd. As you had imagined, the fieldwork had been done within budget and the files appeared to show that, as Mr X had earlier company had maintained a good set of records and produced appropriate documentation to support the draft figures. Some minor errors had been of unadjusted errors, significance, and you had all but watch, another 20 minutes would see you complete your task – the client was now keen to sign off in seven days' time, three weeks earlier than had originally been envisaged. This had just allowed you time to review the files in advance of a meeting with Mr X and his FD later that week to discuss any major issues prior to signing. advised, the noted and added the summary ofr but nothing of finished any your review. You looked at VOUE M You continued with the task at hand and opened the creditors section of the file and reviewed the lead schedule. Everything this year appeared in line with that of the previous year. There were no major variations and, to be honest, you had not expected any. There was, however, a note from the audit senior stating that a large accrual had been included for taxes – and indeed an accrual of $163,937 was included the accounts. This appeared to consist of a charge of $15,000 for the year in question and the had been accrued in previous years. It was clear that the company had not made a period of 8 years. expense had been properly reflected in the accounts. You made a note of this and added it to your list of backlog of the amoea amount which payment of taxes It had, however, ensured that the points to be discussed at the client meeting. You poim remembered that no mention was made of this fact in the consent letter which you had received from the predecessor auditor. You had not been given access to their working papers for the previous year. Whilst the accounts appear to be correctly stated, on the premise that taxes are due to be paid, you are concerned that it would appear as though the company had never tried to resolve this issue with the tax authorities. You also have concerns about how this item will be treated in the corporate tax computation.

Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337386920
Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Chapter15: Using Management And Accounting Information
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 3DQ
icon
Related questions
Question
2. What fundamental ethical principles for accountants are most applicable and is there an apparent conflict between them?
Scenario
You are the audit engagement partner at A Ltd, a small
firm of public accountants. You were recently appointed
as auditor to a local company named B Ltd. The
previous auditors, Z & Co, had resigned due to having
so few audit clients that it was no longer commercially
viable for the firm to retain its registered public
accounting firm
opportunity for your firm to take on the client and you
and your fellow
audit client in what was proving to be a difficult business
environment. Times were
well aware that redundancies were not out of the
status. This had provided the
v partners were delighted to be gaining an
inly tough and you were
question if more work was not picked up quickly. You
had met Mr X, B Ltd.'s Managing Director (MD), at
various local events and had a good personal
relationship
good reputation in
was involved a
You believed that this was a good client to win and, with
Mr X's considerable business connections, this might
not be the only audit client that you would pick up in the
coming months. Mr X had assured you that a good
working pack ( Audit Fee) would be prepared by his
newly installed finance director (FD) to support the
figures in the draft financial statements. Additionally, the
client would arrange for
was not picked up
with him, Mr X was someone with a very
community and
of charitable fundraising activities.
the local business
final publication
accounts.
Six months down the line, you are sitting at your desk
reviewing the audit working papers of B Ltd. As you had
imagined, the fieldwork had been done within budget
and the files appeared to show that, as Mr X had earlier
company had maintained a good set of
records and produced appropriate documentation to
support the draft figures. Some minor errors had been
of unadjusted errors,
significance, and you had all but
watch, another
20 minutes would see you complete your task – the
client was now keen to sign off in seven days' time,
three weeks earlier than had originally been envisaged.
This had just allowed you time to review the files in
advance of a meeting with Mr X and his FD later that
week to discuss any major issues prior to signing.
advised, the
noted and added
the summary ofr
but nothing of
finished
any
your review. You looked at VOUE M
You continued with the task at hand and opened the
creditors section of the file and reviewed the lead
schedule. Everything this year appeared in line with that
of the previous year. There were no major variations
and, to be honest, you had not expected any. There
was, however, a note from the audit senior stating that a
large accrual had been included for taxes – and indeed
an accrual of $163,937 was included
the accounts.
This
appeared
to consist of a charge of $15,000 for the
year in question and the
had been accrued in previous years. It was clear that
the company had not made a
period of 8 years.
expense had been properly reflected in the accounts.
You made a note of this and added it to your list of
backlog of the amoea
amount which
payment of taxes
It had, however, ensured that the
points to be discussed at the client meeting. You
poim
remembered that no mention was made of this fact in
the consent letter which you had received from the
predecessor auditor. You had not been given access to
their working papers for the previous year.
Whilst the accounts appear to be correctly stated, on the
premise that taxes are due to be paid, you are
concerned that it would appear as though the company
had never tried to resolve this issue with the tax
authorities. You also have concerns about how this item
will be treated in the corporate tax computation.
Transcribed Image Text:Scenario You are the audit engagement partner at A Ltd, a small firm of public accountants. You were recently appointed as auditor to a local company named B Ltd. The previous auditors, Z & Co, had resigned due to having so few audit clients that it was no longer commercially viable for the firm to retain its registered public accounting firm opportunity for your firm to take on the client and you and your fellow audit client in what was proving to be a difficult business environment. Times were well aware that redundancies were not out of the status. This had provided the v partners were delighted to be gaining an inly tough and you were question if more work was not picked up quickly. You had met Mr X, B Ltd.'s Managing Director (MD), at various local events and had a good personal relationship good reputation in was involved a You believed that this was a good client to win and, with Mr X's considerable business connections, this might not be the only audit client that you would pick up in the coming months. Mr X had assured you that a good working pack ( Audit Fee) would be prepared by his newly installed finance director (FD) to support the figures in the draft financial statements. Additionally, the client would arrange for was not picked up with him, Mr X was someone with a very community and of charitable fundraising activities. the local business final publication accounts. Six months down the line, you are sitting at your desk reviewing the audit working papers of B Ltd. As you had imagined, the fieldwork had been done within budget and the files appeared to show that, as Mr X had earlier company had maintained a good set of records and produced appropriate documentation to support the draft figures. Some minor errors had been of unadjusted errors, significance, and you had all but watch, another 20 minutes would see you complete your task – the client was now keen to sign off in seven days' time, three weeks earlier than had originally been envisaged. This had just allowed you time to review the files in advance of a meeting with Mr X and his FD later that week to discuss any major issues prior to signing. advised, the noted and added the summary ofr but nothing of finished any your review. You looked at VOUE M You continued with the task at hand and opened the creditors section of the file and reviewed the lead schedule. Everything this year appeared in line with that of the previous year. There were no major variations and, to be honest, you had not expected any. There was, however, a note from the audit senior stating that a large accrual had been included for taxes – and indeed an accrual of $163,937 was included the accounts. This appeared to consist of a charge of $15,000 for the year in question and the had been accrued in previous years. It was clear that the company had not made a period of 8 years. expense had been properly reflected in the accounts. You made a note of this and added it to your list of backlog of the amoea amount which payment of taxes It had, however, ensured that the points to be discussed at the client meeting. You poim remembered that no mention was made of this fact in the consent letter which you had received from the predecessor auditor. You had not been given access to their working papers for the previous year. Whilst the accounts appear to be correctly stated, on the premise that taxes are due to be paid, you are concerned that it would appear as though the company had never tried to resolve this issue with the tax authorities. You also have concerns about how this item will be treated in the corporate tax computation.
Expert Solution
Step 1

Fundamental ethics principles are those moral principles as well as standards which are set through company as whole and individual employees within firm.

 

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:
9781337386920
Author:
William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning