MAC = 50 - 5E. The government offers a $30 per-unit subsidy for abatement. In principle, the firm could ignore the subsidy and continue to emit as many emissions as it was in the absence of government intervention, but there is money to be made from cutting back its emissions. Compared to ignoring the subsidy, how much money could a cost-minimizing firm save or make by cutting back its emissions?

MAC = 50 - 5E. The government offers a $30 per-unit subsidy for abatement. In principle, the firm could ignore the subsidy and continue to emit as many emissions as it was in the absence of government intervention, but there is money to be made from cutting back its emissions. Compared to ignoring the subsidy, how much money could a cost-minimizing firm save or make by cutting back its emissions?

Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition

1st Edition

ISBN:9780078747663

Author:McGraw-Hill

Publisher:McGraw-Hill

Chapter16: Government Spends, Collects, And Owes

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15AA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Imagine a firm with a marginal abatement cost (MAC) function equal to: MAC = 32 - 4E. The government offers a $8 per-unit subsidy for abatement. In principle, the firm could ignore the subsidy and continue to emit as many emissions as it was in the absence of government intervention, but there is money to be made from cutting back its emissions. Compared to ignoring the subsidy, how much money could a cost-minimizing firm save or make by cutting back its emissions? (Hint: remember that firms trade off the benefits of the subsidy with the costs of abatement when deciding how much to abate) Answer:
Explain the difference between regulating emissions via fees vs. standards. Which of the two would be more efficient if there are large differences between the firms’ marginal costs of abatement.
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $6. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $1 to $4, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $. Select one: a. $7.50. O b. $12. C. $3. O d. $4.5.
Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 24 – 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 12 – E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $2. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $4, the firm's total costs increase by $_____. Select one: a. $19. b. $15. c. $16. d. $21. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 150 – 6E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 75 – 3E. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $12 to $24, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $_. Select one: a. $6. b. $24. c. $12. d. $36.
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 30 – 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 15 – E. With a tax on emissions of $6, the benefits of adopting the new technologies are $_ Answer:
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 20 E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 100.5E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $4. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $4, the firm's total costs increase by $ HINT: Total costs include tax payments, total abatement costs, and (if relevant) adoption costs for the new technology. Question 14Select one: a. $20. b. $ 24. c. $10. d. $30.
In the graph below, circle the efficient level of emissions.
Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. With a tax on emissions of $4, the benefits of adopting the new technologies equal:Select one:a. $9.b. $4.50.c. $8.d. $4.
Economists offer two major potential policies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions: pollution taxes and cap-and-trade programs. Which do you think would be most effective at reducing emissions? Discuss the pros and cons of each, as well as the difference between the two policies.
Within the remote nation of New Hope, total industrial production is currently creating a constant level of GDP that results in 2,600 million tonnes per year of carbon being released into the atmosphere. The government announced three years ago that a cap on carbon emissions of 2,430 million tonnes would be imposed. This triggered the creation of new firms that began to plant large plantations of trees grown specifically to absorb carbon from the atmosphere and thus earn carbon credits that they would sell to the highest bidder. See table below for the supply of these earned carbon credits available when the program begins. Quantity of Credits Price of Carbon Credits Created $ 1,125 40 1,225 70 1,325 100 1,425 140 1,525 170 1,625 200 1,725 230 a. What will be the initial price for carbon credits? Initial price $ Next, assume that new technology enables the same level of GDP to be achieved with 5 percent less carbon emissions. b. Now what is the price of carbon credits? Price $
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 200 - 10E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 100 - SE. With a tax on emissions of $20, the benefits of adopting the new technologies equal: Select one: a. $30. b. $20. c. $25. d. $50.