Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $940,000 now and $435,000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs of $70,000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $230,000 per year beginning now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 14% per year. The present worth of option 1 is $-1621119.5 and that of option 2 is $-1384324 Option 2 is more attractive.

Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course List)
13th Edition
ISBN:9781337395083
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Chapter12: Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 17P: The Perez Company has the opportunity to invest in one of two mutually exclusive machines that will...
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Topic Video
Question
Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export
capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $940,000 now and $435,000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs
of $70,000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $230,000 per year beginning
now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which
option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 14% per year.
The present worth of option 1 is $ -1621119.5
and that of option 2 is $ -1384324
Option 2
is more attractive.
Transcribed Image Text:Leonard, a company that manufactures explosion-proof motors, is considering two alternatives for expanding its international export capacity. Option 1 requires equipment purchases of $940,000 now and $435,000 two years from now, with annual M&O costs of $70,000 in years 1 through 10. Option 2 involves subcontracting some of the production at costs of $230,000 per year beginning now through the end of year 10. Neither option will have a significant salvage value. Use a present worth analysis to determine which option is more attractive at the company's MARR of 14% per year. The present worth of option 1 is $ -1621119.5 and that of option 2 is $ -1384324 Option 2 is more attractive.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Capital Budgeting
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course…
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395083
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:
Cengage Learning