In the 1960s, water was inexpensive. However, by 1965 Canada saw one of the country’s worst droughts. At this time, the country produced approximately 70 per cent of the world’s supply of wheat. The summer of 1966 exploded into flames as over 1,400 fires swept the state. The country was forced to increase its imports of barley and oats (close substitutes of wheat) which were sold at a lower price than wheat. Ottawa was particularly hard hit by the drought. There was a limit on the water that could be consumed. Rising to the challenge, residents reduced their water consumption by 66%. As the drought continued, Ottawa saw more and more evidence of just how valuable water was. Besides being motivated to conserve, residents were also willing to spend more money so they would not be as vulnerable again. i. Illustrate and explain the how conditions in 1965-66 impacted (i) the water market and (ii) the wheat market

In the 1960s, water was inexpensive. However, by 1965 Canada saw one of the country’s worst droughts. At this time, the country produced approximately 70 per cent of the world’s supply of wheat. The summer of 1966 exploded into flames as over 1,400 fires swept the state. The country was forced to increase its imports of barley and oats (close substitutes of wheat) which were sold at a lower price than wheat. Ottawa was particularly hard hit by the drought. There was a limit on the water that could be consumed. Rising to the challenge, residents reduced their water consumption by 66%. As the drought continued, Ottawa saw more and more evidence of just how valuable water was. Besides being motivated to conserve, residents were also willing to spend more money so they would not be as vulnerable again. i. Illustrate and explain the how conditions in 1965-66 impacted (i) the water market and (ii) the wheat market

Microeconomics

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617406

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter3: Supply And Demand: Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 24QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In the 1960s, water was inexpensive. However, by 1965 Canada saw one of the country’s worst droughts. At this time, the country produced approximately 70 per cent of the world’s supply of wheat. The summer of 1966 exploded into flames as over 1,400 fires swept the state. The country was forced to increase its imports of barley and oats (close substitutes of wheat) which were sold at a lower price than wheat. Ottawa was particularly hard hit by the drought. There was a limit on the water that could be consumed. Rising to the challenge, residents reduced their water consumption by 66%. As the drought continued, Ottawa saw more and more evidence of just how valuable water was. Besides being motivated to conserve, residents were also willing to spend more money so they would not be as vulnerable again. Illustrate and explain the how conditions in 1965-66 impacted (i) the water market and (ii) the wheat market. Is demand for (i) wheat and (ii) water price elastic or inelastic? Justify…
In the 1960s, water was inexpensive. However, by 1965 Canada saw one of the country's worst droughts. At this time, the country produced approximately 70 per cent of the world's supply of wheat. The summer of 1966 exploded into flames as over 1,400 fires swept the state. The country was forced to increase its imports of barley and oats (close substitutes of wheat which were sold at a lower price than wheat. Ottawa was particularly hard hit by the drought. There was a limit on the water that could be consumed. Rising to the challenge, residents reduced their water consumption by 66%. As the drought continued, Ottawa saw more and more evidence of just how valuable water was. Besides being motivated to conserve, residents were also willing to spend money they would as vulnerable again. Illustrate and explain the how conditions in 1965-66 impacted (i) the water market and ii) the wheat market. [6 marks] ii. Is demand for (i) wheat and (ii) water price elastic or inelastic? Justify your…
In the 1960s, water was inexpensive. However, by 1965 Canada saw one of the country’s worst droughts. At this time, the country produced approximately 70 percent of the world’s supply of wheat. The summer of 1966 exploded into flames as over 1,400 fires swept the state. The country was forced to increase its imports of barley and oats (close substitutes of wheat) which were sold at a lower price than wheat. Ottawa was particularly hard hit by the drought. There was a limit on the water that could be consumed. Rising to the challenge, residents reduced their water consumption by 66%. As the drought continued, Ottawa saw more and more evidence of just how valuable water was. Besides being motivated to conserve, residents were also willing to spend more money so they would not be as vulnerable again. Draw demand and supply curves to show how the conditions in 1965-66 impacted (i) the water market and (ii) the wheat market.
In the 1960s, water was inexpensive. However, by 1965 Canada saw one of the country’s worst droughts. At this time, the country produced approximately 70 percent of the world’s supply of wheat. The summer of 1966 exploded into flames as over 1,400 fires swept the state. The country was forced to increase its imports of barley and oats (close substitutes of wheat) which were sold at a lower price than wheat. Ottawa was particularly hard hit by the drought. There was a limit on the water that could be consumed. Rising to the challenge, residents reduced their water consumption by 66%. As the drought continued, Ottawa saw more and more evidence of just how valuable water was. Besides being motivated to conserve, residents were also willing to spend more money so they would not be as vulnerable again. a. Graph (supply and demand curve) how the conditions in 1965-66 impacted (i) the water market and (ii) the wheat market.
Due to fear about mad cow disease, Japan stopped importing animal feed from Britain in 1996, beef imports and processed beef products from 18 countries including EU members starting in 2001, and similar imports from Canada and the United States in 2003. After U.S. beef imports were banned, McDonald’s Japan and other Japanese importers replaced much of the banned U.S. beef with Australian beef, causing an export boom for Australia (“China Bans U.S. Beef,” cnn.com, December 24, 2003; “Beef Producers Are on the Lookout for Extra Demand,” abc.net.au, June 13, 2005). Use supply and demand curves to show the impact of these events on the domestic Australian beef market.
December, 2006, was a difficult month for Colorado’s beef industry. Multiple heavy snow storms caused thousands of beef cattle to be stranded in nose-high snow drifts. They could not get food or water for themselves. In spite of valiant attempts by the National Guard to drop hay, many died. Beef market prices in the spring were predicted to rise. The series of unfortunate events continued: after the spring thaw, Colorado cattlemen experienced a couple of cases of mad-cow disease. Beef market prices fell (contrary to the earlier prediction). Diagram in (a) the initial impact of the bad winter on the price and quantity. Then, on the same grid, incorporate the impact on price and quantity of the mad-cow cases. Be sure that your final diagram indicates a market price decrease. Using economic terminology, write a statement in (b) explaining the results of your graphical analysis in (a).
December, 2006, was a difficult month for Colorado’s beef industry. Multiple heavy snow storms caused thousands of beef cattle to be stranded in nose-high snow drifts. They could not get food or water for themselves. In spite of valiant attempts by the National Guard to drop hay, many died. Beef market prices in the spring were predicted to rise. The series of unfortunate events continued: after the spring thaw, Colorado cattlemen experienced a couple of cases of mad-cow disease. Beef market prices fell (contrary to the earlier prediction). Diagram in (a) the initial impact of the bad winter on the price and quantity. Then, on the same grid, incorporate the impact on price and quantity of the mad-cow cases. Be sure that your final diagram indicates a market price decrease. Using economic terminology, write a statement in (b) explaining the results of your graphical analysis in (a). a) GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS b) WRITTEN
During the 1980s, most of the world’s supply of lysine was produced by a Japanese company named Ajinomoto. Lysine is an essential amino acid that is an important livestock feed component. At this time, the United States imported most of the world’s supply of lysine—more than 30,000 tons—to use in livestock feed at a price of $1.65 per pound. The worldwide market for lysine, however, fundamentally changed in 1991 when U.S.-based Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) began producing lysine—a move that doubled worldwide production capacity. Experts conjectured that Ajinomoto and ADM had similar cost structures and that the marginal cost of producing and distributing lysine was approximately $0.70 per pound. Despite ADM’s entry into the lysine market, suppose demand remained constant at Q = 208 − 80P (in millions of pounds). Shortly after ADM began producing lysine, the worldwide price dropped to $0.70. By 1993, however, the price of lysine shot back up to $1.65. Use the theories discussed in this…
The drug war There is a debate in the US and in Europe as to how to influence the market for drugs such as cocaine. Some argue that the answer is to reduce the supply of drugs from Colombia – which would otherwise eventually find their way onto the world markets – by giving aid to the Colombian government to fight the drug suppliers. If this is successful, it will drive up the price of cocaine on the streets. Higher prices mean that fewer people will be willing and able to buy drugs, resulting in a fall in demand. This scenario can be seen in Figure 1.13(a) where a successful anti-drug policy in Colombia would decrease supply, i.e. shift the supply curve for cocaine upwards and to the left so that there is an excess demand for cocaine at price P. This will result in a rise in the equilibrium price of cocaine from P to P1. The quantity demanded will contract along the demand curve D from Q to Q1 as price rises from P to P1. Critics of these ideas argue that programmes…
The reaping, processing and sale of sugarcane is a booming sector. However, the late 1990s and early 2000s saw a crisis for sugarcane producers. During this period, the quantity supplied of sugarcane outweighed quantity demanded and the market was in turmoil. Over time the price of sugarcane recovered after 2014, peaking in July 2018. In part, this was due to farmers diversifying into other crops; in part, it was due to buoyant global demand for alternate products. In 2019, however, a combination of good harvests and a fall in fertilizer sugarcane prices caused supply to increase substantially. Although demand was still growing in developing countries, the onset of recession in developed countries was halting the growth in demand. Illustrate and explain (i) how the sugar cane market changed during the period 2014 – 2018 and (ii) what would be required to maintain the original equilibrium price.
Much of the demand for U.S. agricultural output has come from other countries. In 1998, the total demand for wheat was Q = 3,244 - 283P. Of this, total domestic demand was Qn = 1700 - 107P, and domestic supply was Qs = 1,944 + 207P Suppose the export demand for wheat falls by 50 percent. U.S. farmers are concerned about this drop in export demand. What happens to the free-market price of wheat in the United States? The free-market price of wheat in the United States after the drop in export demand is $1.31. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) Do famers have much reason to worry? O A. Farmers have reason to worry because the equilibrium quantity decreases from 3,492.55 million bushels to 2,215.17 million bushels. O B. Farmers have reason to worry because the market price for wheat decreases from $3.65 per bushel to $1.31 per bushel. OC. Farmers have no reason to worry because the equilibrium quantity decreases from 2,592.55 million bushels to 2,215.17 million bushels. O…
Much of the demand for U.S. agricultural output has come from other countries. In 1998, the total demand for wheat was Q = 3244 - 283P. Of this, total domestic demand was QD = 1700 - 107P, and domestic supply was QS =1944 + 207P. Suppose the export demand for wheat falls by 40%. a. U.S. farmers are concerned about this drop in export demand. What happens to the free-market price of wheat in the United States? Do farmers have much reason to worry? b. Now suppose the U.S. government wants to buy enough wheat to raise the price to $3.50 per bushel. With the drop in export demand, how much wheat would the government have to buy? How much would this cost the government?