Green & Company is considering investing in a robotics manufacturing line. Installation of the line will cost an estimated $16.2 million. This amount must be paid immediately even though construction will take three years to complete (years 0, 1, and 2). Year 3 will be spent testing the production line and, hence, it will not yield any positive cash flows. If the operation is very successful, the company can expect after-tax cash savings of $11.2 million per year in each of years 4 through 7. After reviewing the use of these systems with the management of other companies, Green's controller has concluded that the operation will most probably result in annual savings of $8.4 million per year for each of years 4 through 7. However, it is entirely possible that the savings could be as low as $4.2 million per year for each of years 4 through 7. The company uses a 12 percent discount rate. Use Exhibit A.8. Required: Compute the NPV under the three scenarios. Note: Round PV factor to 3 decimal places. Enter your answers in thousands of dollars, rounded to the nearest whole number. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign. Net present value Best Case Expected Worst Case

Green & Company is considering investing in a robotics manufacturing line. Installation of the line will cost an estimated $16.2 million. This amount must be paid immediately even though construction will take three years to complete (years 0, 1, and 2). Year 3 will be spent testing the production line and, hence, it will not yield any positive cash flows. If the operation is very successful, the company can expect after-tax cash savings of $11.2 million per year in each of years 4 through 7. After reviewing the use of these systems with the management of other companies, Green's controller has concluded that the operation will most probably result in annual savings of $8.4 million per year for each of years 4 through 7. However, it is entirely possible that the savings could be as low as $4.2 million per year for each of years 4 through 7. The company uses a 12 percent discount rate. Use Exhibit A.8. Required: Compute the NPV under the three scenarios. Note: Round PV factor to 3 decimal places. Enter your answers in thousands of dollars, rounded to the nearest whole number. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign. Net present value Best Case Expected Worst Case

Name: VinubhaiDon't upload image please Green & Company is considering inves
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:50:59.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: VinubhaiDon't upload image please Green & Company is considering investing in a robotics manufacturing line. Installation of the line will cost an estimated $16.2 million.This amount must be paid immediately even though construction will take three y

Corporate Fin Focused Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781285660516

Author:EHRHARDT

Publisher:EHRHARDT

Chapter11: Cash Flow Estimation And Risk Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1bM

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows: The system will cost 9,000,000 and last 10 years. The companys cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchasedeven if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of 1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of 300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the companys decision?
Jasmine Manufacturing is considering a project that will require an initial investment of $52,000 and is expected to generate future cash flows of $10,000 for years 1 through 3, $8,000 for years 4 and 5, and $2,000 for years 6 through 10. What is the payback period for this project?
Roberts Company is considering an investment in equipment that is capable of producing more efficiently than the current technology. The outlay required is 2,293,200. The equipment is expected to last five years and will have no salvage value. The expected cash flows associated with the project are as follows: Required: 1. Compute the projects payback period. 2. Compute the projects accounting rate of return. 3. Compute the projects net present value, assuming a required rate of return of 10 percent. 4. Compute the projects internal rate of return.
Markoff Products is considering two competing projects, but only one will be selected. Project A requires an initial investment of $42,000 and is expected to generate future cash flows of $6,000 for each of the next 50 years. Project B requires an initial investment of $210,000 and will generate $30,000 for each of the next 10 years. If Markoff requires a payback of 8 years or less, which project should it select based on payback periods?
Green & Company is considering investing in a robotics manufacturing line. Installation of the line will cost an estimated $15.7 million. This amount must be paid immediately even though construction will take three years to complete (years 0, 1, and 2). Year 3 will be spent testing the production line and, hence, it will not yield any positive cash flows. If the operation is very successful, the company can expect after-tax cash savings of $10.7 million per year in each of years 4 through 7. After reviewing the use of these systems with the management of other companies, Green's controller has concluded that the operation will most probably result in annual savings of $7.9 million per year for each of years 4 through 7. However, it is entirely possible that the savings could be as low as $3.7 million per year for each of years 4 through 7. The company uses a 12 percent discount rate. Use Exhibit A.8. Required: Compute the NPV under the three scenarios. Note: Round PV factor to 3…
Sunshine Smoothies Company (SSC) manufactures and distributes smoothies. It is considering the introduction of a "weight loss" smoothie. The project would require a $4 million investment outlay today (t = 0). The after-tax cash flows would depend on whether the weight loss smoothie is well received by consumers. There is a 30% chance that demand will be good, in which case the project will produce after-tax cash flows of $2 million at the end of each of the next 3 years. There is a 70% chance that demand will be poor, in which case the after-tax cash flows will be $1 million for 3 years. The project is riskier than the firm's other projects, so it has a WACC of 12%. The firm will know if the project is successful after receiving first year's cash flows. After receiving the first year's cash flows it will have the option to abandon the project. If the firm decides to abandon the project the company will not receive any cash flows after t = 1 , but it will be able to sell the assets…
Alyeska Salmon Inc is considering a new automated production line project. The project has a cost of $275,000 and is expected to provide after-tax annual cash flows of $73,306 for eight years. The firm’s management prefers using the modified IRR approach. The firm’s WACC is 12%. What’s the terminal value of after-tax annual cash flows for the new automated production line project? What is the project’s MIRR?
JBL Inc. is considering a new product that would require an after-tax investment of $1,400,000 at t = 0. If the new product is well received, then the project would produce after-tax cash flows of $ 650,000 at the end of each of the next 3 years (t = 1, 2, 3), but if the market did not like the product, then the cash flows would be only $100,000 per year. There is a 70% probability that the market will be good. JBL Inc. could delay the project for a year while it conducted a test to determine if demand would be strong or weak. The project's cost and expected annual cash flows are the same whether the project is delayed or not; however, the timing of the cash flows would change. (There would be the same number of cash flows-only the cash flows would be extended out one extra year.) The project's WACC is 10%. What is the value of the project after considering the investment timing option? a. $108, 226.89 b. $ 137, 743.32 c. $167, 259.75 d. $196, 776.18 e. $216, 453.79
Two new software projects are proposed to a young, start-up company. The Alpha project will cost $1,150,000 to develop and is expected to have annual net cash flow of $140,000. The Beta project will cost $1,200,000 to develop and is expected to have annual net cash flow of $150,000. The company is very concerned about their cash flow. Using the payback period, which project is better from a cash flow standpoint? Why?