MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781119256830
Author: Amos Gilat
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Following are measurements of soil concentrations (in mg /kg) of chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) at
20 sites in the area of Cleveland, Ohio. These data are taken from the article "Variation in North
American Regulatory Guidance for Heavy Metal Surface Soil Contamination at Commercial and
Industrial Sites" (A. Jennings and J. Ma, J. Environment Eng, 2007:587-609).
Cr: 260 19 36 247 263 319 317 277 319 264 23 29 61 119 33 281 21 35 64 30
Ni: 435 377 359 53 38 38 54 188 397 33 92 490 28 35 799 347 321 32 74 508
(d) Use these to construct comparative boxplots for the two sets of concentrations.
(e) Using the boxplots, what differences can be seen between the two sets of concentrations?
Expert Solution
arrow_forward
Step 1
Given:
Cr | 260 | 19 | 36 | 247 | 263 | 319 | 317 | 277 | 319 | 264 | 23 | 29 | 61 | 119 | 33 | 281 | 21 | 35 | 64 | 30 |
Ni | 435 | 377 | 359 | 53 | 38 | 38 | 54 | 188 | 397 | 33 | 92 | 490 | 28 | 35 | 799 | 347 | 321 | 32 | 74 | 508 |
Step by stepSolved in 6 steps with 1 images
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 1. A study compared the number of tree species in unlogged forest plots to similar plots logged 8 years earlier. Independent random samples of both logged and unlogged plots were analyzed and the number of tree species was recorded. Tables 1 and 2 present the Shapiro-Wilk normality test for both types of forest plots and the Independent Samples t-test results. Use the information presented in these tables to answer the questions. Table 1: Tests of Normality Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk Forest Plot Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Tree_Species Logged .181 12 .200 .936 12 .444 Unlogged .110 14 .200 .945 14 .480 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Table 2: Independent Samples Test Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Mean Std. Error F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper Equal variances…arrow_forward1. Model 1: OLS, using observations 1-706 Dependent variable: RST Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value const 3586.38 38.9124 92.17 <0.0001 *** TOTWRK −0.150746 0.0167403 −9.005 <0.0001 *** Mean dependent var 3266.356 S.D. dependent var 444.4134 Sum squared resid 1.25e+08 S.E. of regression 421.1357 R-squared 0.103287 Adjusted R-squared 0.102014 F(1, 704) 81.08987 P-value(F) 1.99e-1810538.19 Log-likelihood −5267.096 Akaike criterion 10538.19 Schwarz criterion 10547.31 Hannan-Quinn 10541.71 RSTi =3586.38−0.150746 x TOTWRKi , R2=0.103287,SER=421.1357 (38.9124) (0.0167403) Question? A- The researcher claims that the model lacks a fundamental principle, namely, the impact of the worker’s gender on their efficiency. The researcher further claims that Men on average take more resting time than women. To clarify the researcher’s claim, add the binary variable MALE into your model, and write down the estimated results…arrow_forwardIn the above plot, a rejection of the null hypothesis that the population regression slope is equal to 0 implies: a) the correlation coefficient in the population is likely equal to 0 b) the correlation coefficient in the population is likely unequal to 0 c) the standard deviation of height is likely very large d) the standard deviation of weightis likely very small e) the correlation coefficient must be close to 1.0 f) a and c g) b and e h) b, d and earrow_forward
- ONLY NEED THE ANSWER FOR C)arrow_forwardAuto noise filters In a statement to a Senate Public WorksCommittee, a senior executive of Texaco, Inc., cited astudy on the effectiveness of auto filters on reducing noise. Because of concerns about performance, two types of fil-ters were studied, a standard silencer and a new device developed by the Associated Octel Company. Here are theboxplots from the data on noise reduction (in decibels) ofthe two filters. Type 1 = standard; Type 2 = Octel. ANOVA Table Source DFSum ofSquaresMeanSquare F-Ratio P-ValueType 1 6.31 6.31 0.7673 0.3874Error 33 271.47 8.22Total 34 2.77Means and Std DeviationsLevel n Mean StdDevStandard 18 81.5556 3.2166Octel 17 80.7059 2.43708a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses?b) What do you conclude from the ANOVA table?c) Do the assumptions for the test seem to be reasonable?d) Perform a two-sample pooled t-test of the difference.What P-value do you get? Show that the square of thet-statistic is the same (to rounding error) as the F-ratio.arrow_forward1. Model 1: OLS, using observations 1-706 Dependent variable: RST Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value const 3586.38 38.9124 92.17 <0.0001 *** TOTWRK −0.150746 0.0167403 −9.005 <0.0001 *** Mean dependent var 3266.356 S.D. dependent var 444.4134 Sum squared resid 1.25e+08 S.E. of regression 421.1357 R-squared 0.103287 Adjusted R-squared 0.102014 F(1, 704) 81.08987 P-value(F) 1.99e-1810538.19 Log-likelihood −5267.096 Akaike criterion 10538.19 Schwarz criterion 10547.31 Hannan-Quinn 10541.71 RSTi =3586.38−0.150746 x TOTWRKi , R2=0.103287,SER=421.1357 (38.9124) (0.0167403) Question? Test the significance of the slope coefficient of the regression in Part (1) above. Use 5% level of significance on: a. Level of significance approach (show your calculations of t-ratio) b. P-value approach (show your calculation of p-value) please show the complete steps as well as the interpretation(s) involved in each of the above…arrow_forward
- Please help me with this problem and i needed only part d and e only please.... Very urgentarrow_forward6.34. A TIW layer is deposited on a substrate using a sput- tering tool. Table 6E.14 contains layer thickness - TABLE 6E.14 Layer Thickness Data for Exercise 6.34 Subgroup Ir 459 449 435 450 443 440 442 442 3 457 444 449 444 4 469 463 453 438 5 443 457 445 454 444 456 456 457 7 445 449 450 445 8 446 455 449 452 9 444 452 457 440 10 432 463 463 443 11 445 452 453 438 12 456 457 436 457 13 459 445 441 447 14 441 465 438 450 15 460 453 457 438 16 453 444 451 435 17 451 460 450 457 18 422 431 437 429 19 444 446 448 467 20 450 450 454 454arrow_forwardPlease do not give solution in image formate thanku.arrow_forward
- 1. A study compared the number of tree species in unlogged forest plots to similar plots logged 8 years earlier. Independent random samples of both logged and unlogged plots were analyzed and the number of tree species was recorded. Tables 1 and 2 present the Shapiro-Wilk normality test for both types of forest plots and the Independent Samples t-test results. Use the information presented in these tables to answer the questions. Table 1: Tests of Normality Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk Forest Plot Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Tree_Species Logged .181 12 .200 .936 12 .444 Unlogged .110 14 .200 .945 14 .480 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Table 2: Independent Samples Test Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Mean Std. Error F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper Equal variances…arrow_forwardPlease slect from provided answers.arrow_forward1. Consider the following data collected regarding infant blood pressure, age, and birth weight: i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Birth weight in oz. (x1) 135 120 100 105 130 125 125 105 120 90 120 95 120 150 160 125 Age in days (x2) 3 4 3 2 4 5 2 3 5 4 2 3 3 4 3 3 Systolic Blood Pressure mmHg (y) 89 90 83 77 92 98 82 85 96 95 80 79 86 97 92 88 a. Fit a model to predict SBP from birth weight and Age. Present the equation of the least-squares regression line. b. Interpret the beta coefficients for Birth weight and Age. c. Are Birth weight and/or Age significantly associated with SBP at the alpha = 0.05 level? d. Interpret the corresponding 95% confidence intervals for both Birth weight and Age.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305251809
Author:Jay L. Devore
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305504912
Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...
Statistics
ISBN:9780134683416
Author:Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319042578
Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319013387
Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:W. H. Freeman