Explain why the following statement is true: "All else the same, firms with relatively stable sales are able to carry relatively high debt/assets ratios." If a firm went from zero debt to successively higher levels of debt, why would you expect its stock price to first rise, then hit a peak, and then begin to decline? Explain how a firm might shift its capital structure so as to change its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). What would be the impact on the value of the firm?

Explain why the following statement is true: "All else the same, firms with relatively stable sales are able to carry relatively high debt/assets ratios." If a firm went from zero debt to successively higher levels of debt, why would you expect its stock price to first rise, then hit a peak, and then begin to decline? Explain how a firm might shift its capital structure so as to change its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). What would be the impact on the value of the firm?

Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation

8th Edition

ISBN:9781285190907

Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Publisher:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Chapter11: Risk-adjusted Expected Rates Of Return And The Dividends Valuation Approach

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6QE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Is the debt level that maximizes a firm's expected EPS the same as the one that maximizes its stock price? Explain. Explain how a firm might shift its capital structure so as to change its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). What would be the impact on the value of the firm?
Which one of the followings is incorrect regarding to cost of equity: On average, it is higher than cost of debt. It moves in the same direction with tax rates. It is affected by return on market portfolio. For a dividend paying company, it is sensitive to growth expectations for future dividends. It is highly dependent on risk level of the firm and growth rate. For calculating cost of equity, we can rely on dividend growth model or SML approach. Both models might suffer from the assumption that past is a good predictor of future. True False Percy's Wholesale Supply has earnings before interest and taxes of €106,000. Both the book and the market value of debt is €170,000. The unlevered cost of equity is 15.5 per cent while the pre-tax cost of debt is 8.6 per cent. The tax rate is 28 per cent. What is the firm's weighted average cost of capital? Show your steps.
Is this statement true or false? Give a reason for your answer. "The bird-in-hand theory suggests that a company can reduce its cost of equity capital by reducing its dividend payout ratio."
Explain what this statement means: "One type of leverage affects both EBIT and EPS. The other type affects only EPS." Explain why the following statement is true: "All else the same, firms with relatively stable sales are able to carry relatively high debt/assets ratios." If a firm went from zero debt to successively higher levels of debt, why would you expect its stock price to first rise, then hit a peak, and then begin to decline? Is the debt level that maximizes a firm's expected EPS the same as the one that maximizes its stock price? Explain. Explain how a firm might shift its capital structure so as to change its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). What would be the impact on the value of the firm?
You observe that a firm?s profit margin is below the industry average, while its return on equity and debt ratio exceed the industry average. What can you conclude?
According to MM propositions, which of the following statements best describes the consequence of increasing debt-to-value ratio for a firm? Group of answer choices The weighted average cost of capital can decrease. The weighted average cost of capital can increase. The cost of equity capital can decrease. The weighted average cost of capital must not stay constant.
What make ROE(return on equity) of a company decrease further into negatives even though their financial leverage starts to rises? If a company multiplier for financial leverage starts to rise, what does it implies? Why?
Which of the following statements is correct? A. If a firm’s assets are growing at a positive rate, but its retained earnings are not increasing, then it would be impossible for the firm’s AFN to be negative. B. AFN is not always positive. C. If a firm increases its dividend payout ratio in anticipation of higher earnings, but sales and earnings actually decrease, then the firm’s actual AFN must, mathematically, exceed the previously calculated AFN. D. Higher sales usually require higher asset levels, and this leads to what we call AFN. However, the AFN will be zero if the firm chooses to retain all of its profits, i.e., to have a zero dividend payout ratio. E. Dividend policy does not affect the requirement for external funds based on the AFN equation.
For each statement indicate whether it is true or false and briefly explain why. a) In a perfect capital market with no corporate taxes, as a firm takes on more and more debt its weighted average cost of capital remains unchanged while its required return on equity rises. b) If a firm issues riskfree debt the risk of the firm’s equity will not change. So, risk-free debt allows the firm to get the benefit of a low cost of debt without raising its cost of equity. c) In the context of firms’ capital structure decisions, the theory predicts that the value of a firm’s equity will rise in direct proportion to the level of debt in its capital structure.
The cost of equity rises as the quantity of debt rises in each of the capital structure theories. So, why don't financial managers employ as little debt as feasible to keep equity costs low? After all, aren't finance managers expected to increase a company's value?
Does decreasing net margin percentages and slightly increasing financial leverage have an effect on Return on Equity (ROE)?. If Yes, What should a company do to solve such problem.
Which of the following assumptions are necessary for AFN equation to work? 1) The ratios A0/S and LO/S, the profit margin, and payout ratio are stable. 2) Common stock and long-term debt are tied directly to sales. 3) None of the firm's ratios will change. 4) Fixed assets, but not current assets, are tied directly to sales. 5) Last year's total assets were not optimal for last year's sales.