Do the comparison between Darwin's and Lamarck's discovery of evolution in depth, by mentioning what are the similarities and focus on the differences between both theories & their hypothesis too.

Locate two instances of Darwinian evolution being misrepresented by a Lamarckian approach in the media (print, electronic, etc.). Give the following information for both.Its beginnings?

. Some scientists vigorously rejected Darwin’sideas when On the Origin of Species was published. Richard Owen (1860), perhaps the mostrespected biologist in England, wrote (amongmany other objections): “Are all the recognisedorganic forms of the present date, so differentiated, so complex, so superior to conceivableprimordial simplicity of form and structure,as to testify to the effects of Natural Selectioncontinuously operating through untold time?Unquestionably not. The most numerous livingbeings … are precisely those which offer suchsimplicity of form and structure, as best agrees…with that ideal prototype from which…vegetableand animal life might have diverged.” Howmight Darwin, or you, argue against Owen’slogic?

Lamarck proposed that evolution occurs through the following basic steps: Organisms are born with certain traits. Over the course of an organism's life, these traits gradually change due to pressures in the environment. The changes that occurred during an organism's life are passed on to its young. This idea is similar to current understandings of how evolution works, but it is not quite correct. Which of the following situations is a counterexample that disproves Lamarck's proposed pattern of how evolution occurs?   A. Even though the ability to fly would be useful to snakes, snakes cannot spontaneously grow wings.   B. Dolphins and whales have become hairless because the fast movement of the water removes all the hair.   C. A person who is a championship bodybuilder does not have children who are naturally muscular at birth.