Question
Discuss diplomatic immunity, legislative immunity and witness immunity. What are the purposes of each? Should any be done away with
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The State of Florida has passed a statute nullifying any marriage that has previously been recognized, as well as outlawing any future marriages, for anyone who did not attend college. The statute gives no notice to any married couple and gives them no ability to challenge the statue. This statute has been challenged as unconstitutional by a group of married individuals as well as marriage equality groups. The groups have filed a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which was granted. You are a law clerk for one of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Your task is to outline what arguments might be filed in a brief filed by both sides of this issue, so your Justice will be prepared for the arguments made by either side. Please include arguments for those supporting and those opposing the law. These arguments should focus on: 1. The Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause (what analysis will a court perform to decide if there is a violation of these…arrow_forwardIn 2018, Carlos Ghosn, the chairperson of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Nissan), was arrested for alleged misconduct and criminal offences related to underreporting remuneration and misrepresenting annual disclosures. Detailed investigations revealed similar misrepresentations by the company’s chief executive officer (CEO) Hiroto Saikawa, who was forced to resign. The actions of senior officials left a deep stain on Nissan’s reputation, causing investors to question the effect of corporate governance at Nissan—and by extension, at similar companies across Japan and the world. As details of the scandal unfolded, Nissan suffered negative public repercussions. Its share-based incentive systems, excessive focus on profitability, and cost-cutting measures had caused deviations from normal risk management procedures, resulting in the production of poor-quality vehicles and thus vehicle recalls. Consumer trust in the company dropped, as did sales and profitability figures, with a continuous fall in…arrow_forwardGiven the principles noted in the case, how can companies comment on their positive actions to promote human rights so that consumers will think well of them? Would you propose that a company (a) do nothing, (b) construct a corporate code of ethics, or (c) align itself with some of the universal covenants or compacts prepared by international agencies?arrow_forward
- Please answer this very simple question displayed with the image abovearrow_forwardthe tragedy of commons, in Hardin's sense, often plays itself out in environmental ways, from generic human self-interest to overuse of finite resources and environmental degradation. How might the tragedy of the commons, as enacted through commercial enterprise, play out with respect to society? Isolate some examples of the tragedy of the commons, and discuss whether a resolution to this problem is possible, and if so, how it might come about.arrow_forwardChoose a company that operates within the Caribbean Region and apply the concept ofpsychological contracts to that company, by discussing its main features and how they develop.Discuss how employees’ psychological contracts might be violated and the consequences of theseviolations for employers.arrow_forward
- What role, if any, should the state governments play in the adoption and enforcement of immigration policy?arrow_forwardThe Business Establishment in Lebanon is a legal entity capable of: Owning properties. Opening a bank account. Having a nationality. None of the above.arrow_forward"7. Freedom of Speech. Wandering Dago, Inc. (WD), operates a food truck in Albany, New York. WD brands itself and the food it sells with language generally viewed as ethnic slurs. Owners Andrea Loguidice and Brandon Snooks, however, view the branding as giving a “nod to their Italian heritage” and “weakening the derogatory force of the slur.” Twice, WD applied to participate as a vendor in a summer lunch program in a state-owned plaza. Both times, the New York State Office of General Services (OGS) denied the appli-cation because of WD’s branding. WD filed a suit in a federal district court against RoAnn Destito, the commissioner of OGS, contending that the agency had violated WD’s right to free speech. What principles apply to the government’s regula-tion of the content of speech? How do those principles apply in WD’s case? Explain. [Wandering Dago, Inc. v. Destito, 879 F.3d 20 (2d Cir. 2018)] (See Business and the Bill of Rights.)"arrow_forward
- please help out with these Human Rights Theory questions. only 3-4 sentence would be enough. Assume for now that you accept the distinction between positive and negative rights. Define negative rights, giving one example to illustrate your definition. What is the relationship between state sovereignty and human rightsarrow_forwardA Greek yogurt maker owns and operates a production facility in Switzerland. Within the next six months, the Swiss government has stipulated that all local food producers must list the genetically modified ingredients (GMO) contained in the product on its packaging label. GMO foods or, as critics commonly call them, "Franken-foods," in honor of Frankenstein, use genetic material that have been altered using genetic engineering techniques in making the food. Companies are often reluctant to post this information, fearful that it might result in people choosing not to use their products. Although labeling of GMO products in the marketplace is required in 64 countries, many others, including Greece, do not impose this regulation. Interestingly, reporting this information on the label is not required in the United States and no distinction between marketing GMO and non-GMO foods are presently recognized by the United States’ Food and Drug Administration. Dealing with growing demand for…arrow_forwardImmigration law has become increasingly important in recent years, and it is estimated there are over 14 million undocumented immigrants today in the United States. Many come to the United States in hopes of finding work. The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) makes it illegal to hire, recruit, or refer for a fee someone not authorized to work legally in the United States. When it comes to hiring new employees, explain the requirements for employers today to comply with IRCA and the penalties for violating the law.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios