David is an expected-utility maximizer that likesto drive fast (and reckless at times), so hisprobability of an accident is 2/3. David'spreferences over wealth are u(w) = vw. Supposethat David's initial wealth is $100. If David has anaccident, he incurs a $51 loss. How much is therisk premium David willing to pay to be as welloff in case of accident or not?

David, an individual who prioritizes maximizing expected utility, has a penchant for driving fast,…

David is an expected-utility maximizer that likes to drive fast (and reckless at times), so his probability of an accident is 2/3. David's preferences over wealth are u(w) = √w. Suppose that David's initial wealth is $100. If David has an accident, he incurs a $51 loss. How much is the risk premium David willing to pay to be as well off in case of accident or not?

David is an expected-utility maximizer that likes to drive fast (and reckless at times), so his probability of an accident is 2/3. David's preferences over wealth are u(w) = √w. Suppose that David's initial wealth is $100. If David has an accident, he incurs a $51 loss. How much is the risk premium David willing to pay to be as well off in case of accident or not?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Veer
Joey has utility function 1+√x where x is the amount of money he has. He is... A) Cannot tell from the information provided B) Risk averse C) Risk Netutral D) Risk Loving
Janet's broad attitude to risk (risk averse, risk neutral, or risk loving) is independent of her wealth. She has initial wealth w and is offered the opportunity to buy a lottery ticket. If she buys it, her final wealth will be either w + 4 or w – 2, each equally likely. She is indifferent between buying the ticket and not buying it. Janet offers her friend Sam (who has identical preferences and initial wealth) the following proposition: They buy the ticket together, and share the cost and proceeds equally. Sam has another idea: They buy two tickets (that have independent outcomes) and share the costs and proceeds equally. Suppose that Janet's and Sam's utility of income is given by u(x) = In x and the initla wealth of each one of them is equal to w = 4. Which of the following statements is true? O a. Both agents prefer Sam's solutions to Janet's solution. b. Both agents prefer Janet's solutions to Sam's solution. The agents are indifferent between Janet's solutions to Sam's solution.…
Janet's broad attitude to risk (risk averse, risk neutral, or risk loving) is independent of her wealth. She has initial wealth w and is offered the opportunity to buy a lottery ticket. If she buys it, her final wealth will be either w + 4 or w – 2, each equally likely. She is indifferent between buying the ticket and not buying it. Janet offers her friend Sam (who has identical preferences and initial wealth) the following proposition: They buy the ticket together, and share the cost and proceeds equally. Should Sam accept the offer? O a. Yes, Sam should accept the offer. O b. No, Sam should reject the offer. O c. Sam would be indifferent between accepting an rejecting the offer. O d. There is not enough information to determine if Sam should accept or reject the offer.
5. Larry, who has wealth (w) of 100, faces a 25% probability that a catastrophe will eliminate all of his wealth. Larry's utility function is u(w) = In (w + 1). We will cover insurance on 12/2 in case you want to hold off on parts (b) and (d) until then. Characterize Larry's preference over risk. Is he risk-averse, risk-loving, or risk-neutral? а. Explain. b. What is the highest premium that Larry would accept for full insurance? C. Alternatively, suppose that Larry's utility is u (w) = e". Characterize his preference for risk and explain your answer. d. Under this alternative utility function, what is the highest premium that Larry would accept for full insurance? Explain.
The value of a successful project is $420,000; the probabilities of success are 1/2 with good supervision and 1/4 without. The manager is risk neutral, not risk averse as in the text, so his expected utility equals his expected income minus his disutility of effort. He can get other jobs paying $90,000, and his disutility for exerting the extra effort for good supervision on your project is $100,000. (a) Show that inducing high effort would require the firm to offer a compensation scheme with a negative base salary; that is, if the project fails, the manager pays the firm an amount stipulated in the scheme. (b) How might a negative base salary be implemented in reality? (c) Show that if a negative base salary is not feasible, then the firm does better to settle for the low-pay, low-effort situation.
Consider the model of competitive insurance discussed in lectures (Topic 6.7). Peter is a risk averse individual with the utility function u(w) = w0.5. His current wealth is $300 and with probability 1/2 he will incur a loss of D = $240, but with probability 1/2 he will incur no loss. Ann has the same utility u(w) = w0.5 and current wealth $300 as Peter, but a different probability of loss: she will incur a loss of D = $240 with probability 0.1, and no loss with probability 0.9. As we showed in lectures, in the separating equilibrium Peter is offered actuarially fair full insurance contract, so his wealth is equal to $180, whether loss happens or not. Ann will be offered an insurance contract with the amount of insurance (approximately) equal to Group of answer choices 0 16 36 66 120 240
Setup from Question 1) An expected utility maximiser owns a car worth £60 000 and has a bank account with £20 000. The money in the bank is safe, but there is a 50% probability that the car will be stolen. The utility of wealth for the agent is u(y) = In(y) and they have no other assets. Question 2)
Bob's farm harvests corns worth 102 thousand dollars (and nothing else). In each year, there is a 20% chance that a storm will attack and leaves him with only 24 thousand dollars worth of the corns. Bob's preferences over wealth are represented by U = In w. What is the maximum that Bob is willing to pay for full insurance (in unit of thousand dollars)? Please round your answer to the nearest integer.
Janet’s broad attitude to risk (risk averse, risk neutral, or risk loving) is independent of her wealth. She has initial wealth w and is offered the opportunity to buy a lottery ticket. If she buys it, her final wealth will be either w+4 or w−2, each equally likely. She is indifferent between buying the ticket and not buying it. Janet offers her friend Sam (who has identical preferences and initial wealth) the following proposition: They buy the ticket together, and share the cost and proceeds equally. Sam has another idea: They buy two tickets (that have independent outcomes) and share the costs and proceeds equally. Suppose that Janet's and Sam's utility of income is given by u(x)=ln⁡x and the initIal wealth of each one of them is equal to w=4. Recall the proposal made by Janet, and the solution put forward by Sam. Which of the following statements is true? a. Both agents prefer Sam's solutions to Janet's solution. b. Both agents prefer Janet's solutions to Sam's solution.…
Shane just bought a house worth $360,000 in an area that is known for floods. A flood occurs with a 5% chance and if it occurs, his home is ✓ for reduced in value to $202,500. Shane has utility function given by U(X)=√√X. He would be willing to pay a maximum of flood insurance. The fair insurance premium for flood insurance is Shane's risk premium is Suppose, instead, that Shane's utility function is given by U(X) = X². Then, the maximum he would be willing to pay for flood insurance is
Exercise 5: Insurance Consider two individuals, Dave and Eva. Both Dave and Eva have initial wealth 810,000 and face a 40% chance of losing L = 450, 000. Dave has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function up(x) = x and Eva has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function ug (x) = VT. 1. What do you know about Dave's and Eva's risk preferences? 2. What is the most Dave would be willing to pay for complete insurance against the loss? 3. What is the most Eva would be willing to pay for complete insurance against the loss? Suppose they are each able choose insurance with any coverage level z [0, 1] (i.e. 0 0. 6. Is Eva's optimal choice full insurance, i.e. z = 1?