8. The degree of risk aversion for an individual can be captured by the curvature of the utility function over wealth. Suppose two people with $200 of wealth face the same independent risk of a $100 loss. With probability of 10%, each may have wealth of 100 instead of $200. Person A has a utility function over wealth of u(w) = w0.5. Is it possible to find a contract that benefits both parties? If so, write a contingent contract that can given that person B has the following utility functions. (Contingent means a 2 contract that depends on an outcome.) Show, for your proposed contract, that both parties have higher expected utility. You will need to calculate the expected utility for each individual and each contract separately. As a hint, it is useful to recognize that, if the risks are independent, there is a 1% chance of both losses occurring; an 18% chance of one loss; and an 81% chance of no loss at all. a. UB = w b. UB = WB ,0.5 C. UB = WB d. Suppose that the risks are not independent. Is it still possible to write a contract that benefits both parties? Explain.
8. The degree of risk aversion for an individual can be captured by the curvature of the utility function over wealth. Suppose two people with $200 of wealth face the same independent risk of a $100 loss. With probability of 10%, each may have wealth of 100 instead of $200. Person A has a utility function over wealth of u(w) = w0.5. Is it possible to find a contract that benefits both parties? If so, write a contingent contract that can given that person B has the following utility functions. (Contingent means a 2 contract that depends on an outcome.) Show, for your proposed contract, that both parties have higher expected utility. You will need to calculate the expected utility for each individual and each contract separately. As a hint, it is useful to recognize that, if the risks are independent, there is a 1% chance of both losses occurring; an 18% chance of one loss; and an 81% chance of no loss at all. a. UB = w b. UB = WB ,0.5 C. UB = WB d. Suppose that the risks are not independent. Is it still possible to write a contract that benefits both parties? Explain.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
Only typed solution
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 6 steps with 17 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education