Consider the following simultaneous-move game that represents the payoffs from different advertising campaigns (low, medium, and high spending) for two political candidates that are running for a particular office. The values in the payoff matrix represent the share of the popular vote earned by each candidate is given below. T equilibrium in dominant strategies Candidate A-low Candidate A-medium Candidate A-high Candidate B-low Candidate B-medium Candidate B-high 50, 50 60, 40 80, 20 40, 60 50, 50 65, 35 20, 80 35,65 50, 50

Consider the following simultaneous-move game that represents the payoffs from different advertising campaigns (low, medium, and high spending) for two political candidates that are running for a particular office. The values in the payoff matrix represent the share of the popular vote earned by each candidate is given below. T equilibrium in dominant strategies Candidate A-low Candidate A-medium Candidate A-high Candidate B-low Candidate B-medium Candidate B-high 50, 50 60, 40 80, 20 40, 60 50, 50 65, 35 20, 80 35,65 50, 50

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter13: best-practice Tactics: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the strategic voting game discussed at the endof this chapter, where we saw that the strategy profile (Bustamante, Schwarzenegger,Schwarzenegger) is a Nash equilibrium of the game. Show that (Bustamante, Schwarzeneg-ger, Schwarzenegger) is, in fact , the only rationalizable strategy profile. Do this by firstconsidering the dominated strategies of player L. (Basically, the question is asking youto find the outcome of the iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies)
Suppose two players play a two-period repeated game, where the stage game is the normal-form game shown below. Is there a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium in which the players select (A, X) in the first period? If so, fully describe such equilibrium. If not, explain why not. Player 1 has choice A, B; Player 2 has choice X, Y, Z. Payoff: (A,X)-(5,7), (A,Y)-(2,4), (A,Z)-(3,8), (B,X)-(1,4), (B,Y)-(3,5), (B,Z)-(1,4)
Suppose O2 and Vodafone are the only two telecommunicationscompanies in UK. Both companies are considering whether ornot to stop offering unlimited data plans. Each company has twostrategies: stop or don’t stop. The first entry in the brackets is the payoffsof O2 and the second entry is the payoffs of Vodafone, both in $million.What will be the dominant strategies of O2 and Vodafone and what willbe the Nash equilibrium? Explain your answers.
Explain all will rate what is always true for a pure nash equilibrium of a two-person non zero-sum game A.No player can improve his payoff with a unilateral change of strategy B. it is a Pareto maximum of the payoff matrix C. No player can worsen the payoff of his opponent with a unilateral change of strategy D. It gives worse payoffs to both players than any berge equilibrium
Consider the two-player game illustrated here. a. For each player, derive those strategies which survive the iterativedeletion of strictly dominated strategies.b. Derive all strategy pairs that are Nash equilibria.
Consider the following game. There are two payers, Player 1 and Player 2. Player 1 chooses a row (10, 20, or 30), and Player 2 chooses a column (10/20/30). Payoffs are in the cells of the table, with those on the left going to Player 1 and those on the right going to player 2. For example, a payoff 100/200 would mean Player 1 receives 100 and Player 2 receives 200.What is [are] the Nash Equilibrium [Equilibria] of this game?A) (10/10) and (20/20)B) (30/30)C) (10/20) and (20/10)D) (20/20)E) (30/30)
if Y =4 (b) What is the highest payoff any player can receive in any subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of the repeated game?
if Y = 4 (a) If ⟨a,d⟩ is played in the first period and ⟨b,e⟩ is played in the second period, what is the resulting (repeated game) payoff for the row player? (b) What is the highest payoff any player can receive in any subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of the repeated game?
Consider this market that is dominated by two airlines, American and United. Each can choose to charge a high price (and restrict capacity) or charge a low price (and expand capacity). If one of the airlines reduces the price and the other does not, then the airline that reduced the price can capture customers from the other airline. The profits for each outcome is shown below: a. Does United have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Explain. b. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Explain. c. Is this game an example of a Prisoner’s Dilemma? Explain.
Consider the following game where two players have to decide if they want to buy a movie ticket or a baseball ticket. They have the highest payoffs when they both buy tickets to the same activity, but must decide simultaneously what to buy without knowing what the other person will do. a. Does either player have a dominant strategy? b. How many equilibria does this game have? c. Is this an example of a prisoner’s dilemma? Explain. d. What will be the outcome if your friend buys their ticket first and you can observe their choice?
Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.
True or False?: (Recall that a strategic game is called Dominance Solvable if and only if exactlyone action profile remains after iteratively eliminating all strictly dominated actions.)If a strategic game is dominance solvable, it can have at most one Nash equilibrium.