Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781337517942
Author: NICHOLSON
Publisher: Cengage
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Consider a utility function defined over hours of leisure and consumption expenditure: U(c, h) ch. The after- tax wage rate is given by w and the amount of nonwage income, by N. Assume the number of hours of leisure in a year is 8000. Potential annual income, I, is given by 1-8000wN. It is allocated over hours of leisure, which cost wh, and consumption expenditure, c. The budget constraint is thus 8000wN-cwh 0. 1. Find the demand functions for leisure and consumption. a. Write the Lagrangean function for this problem. b. Find the first order conditions. c. Solve the first order conditions to obtain the condition that the MRS wage rate. Show your steps in the solution. d. Use the results from c to obtain the expansion patharrow_forwardSuppose that the consumerís preferences are given by refer to image for the restarrow_forwardA4arrow_forward
- James has a wage income of $50.000 in the present and $200.000 in the future. His utility is given as U = min (2Cp, Cr) - that is, his utility is the lesser of twice the dollars spent on present consumption or the dollars spent on future consumption. The interest rate is 30%. (A) What is the minimum amount of money James would be willing to accept today to have the interest rate at 40% rather than 30%? Explain and show work (B) What is the maximum amount of money James would pay today to have the interest rate at 30% rather than 40%? Explain and show workarrow_forward3) Marco has $100 worth of grain in period 1 but gets no grain in period 2. Marco has two choices. He can store the grain that he does not consume in period 1. This results in a loss of 20% of the grain due to pests. Assume that with this option he will choose to consume 68 units of grain in period 1 and 26 units in period 2. Instead, Marco can sell the grain he does not consume in period 1 and lend the money from that sale to someone today at an interest rate of 10%. He can then use the repayment of that loan to buy gain in period 2. a) Based on this information, draw a diagram that outlines Marco's choices. Is he definitely better off once the opportunity to lend is available to him? b) Relative to his initial equilibrium point, does he unambiguously consume more in both periods once he can lend out the excess he does not consume in period 1? c) Now assume that Marco can sell any excess grain he doesn't consume in period 1 and invest the money he gets in a new type of risky activity.…arrow_forwardAssume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. Derive and plot the feasible set, between daily values of consumption c, and “leisure”, l. Label the values at the intercepts (the points where the feasible frontier cuts the two axes).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you