Based on M & M with taxes and without taxes, how much time should a financial manager spend analyzing the capital structure of their firm? The bird in hand theory suggests that a company can reduce its cost of equity capital by reducing its dividend payout ratio. Is this so and why? the homemade dividend strategy argues that investors impose their dividend preference on the firm. is this true or false and why

Based on M & M with taxes and without taxes, how much time should a financial manager spend analyzing the capital structure of their firm? The bird in hand theory suggests that a company can reduce its cost of equity capital by reducing its dividend payout ratio. Is this so and why? the homemade dividend strategy argues that investors impose their dividend preference on the firm. is this true or false and why

Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation

8th Edition

ISBN:9781285190907

Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Publisher:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw

Chapter11: Risk-adjusted Expected Rates Of Return And The Dividends Valuation Approach

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6QE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Is this statement true or false? Give a reason for your answer. "The bird-in-hand theory suggests that a company can reduce its cost of equity capital by reducing its dividend payout ratio."
Which of the following actions should a manager take to optimize the firm's value? * Changing the capital structure if and only if the firm's value rises. Changing the capital structure if and only if the firm's value rises to the advantage of inside management Changing the capital structure if and only if the firm's value increases solely to the benefit of debtholders. Changing the capital structure if and only if the firm's value increases, even if it lowers stockholders' value. Changing the capital structure if and only if the firm's value grows and stockholder equity remains stable.
The homemade dividend strategy argues that investors impose their dividend preference on the firm, is this true or false and why? The bird in hand theory suggests that a company can reduce its cost of equity capital by reducing its dividend payout ratio. true or false and why? A company can always increase its stock price by increasing its dividend payout ratio. true or false and why?
A firm’s value depends on its expected free cash flow and its cost of capital. Distributions made in the form of dividends or stock repurchases impact the firm’s value and the investors in different ways. Some analysts have argued that a firm’s value should solely be determined by its basic earning power and the business risk of the firm. Which of these concepts would support these analysts’ argument? The signaling hypothesis The residual dividend model The clientele effect Dividend irrelevance theory
Which of the following about optimal capital structure is incorrect? Optimal capital structure is the mixed of debt and equity capital that minimizes the firm’s weighted average cost of capital A company that follows the pecking order theory will use external financing thru debt after exhausting all the possible financing thru equity The management empire-building theory views high interest payments as to prevent management from unreasonable spending A company can take advantage of its high corporate tax rate as tax shield, under the trade-off theory
Which of the following statements is INCORRECT? Cutting the firm's dividend to increase investment will raise the share price if, and only if, the new investments have a positive net present value (NPV). If the firm retains more earnings, it will have less to payout to shareholders. A firm will increase its share price by reducing the total payout to shareholders. A firm can increase its growth rate by increasing its retention ratio.
Is the debt level that maximizes a firm's expected EPS the same as the one that maximizes its stock price? Explain. Explain how a firm might shift its capital structure so as to change its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). What would be the impact on the value of the firm?
One position expressed in the financial literature is that firms set their dividends as aresidual after using income to support new investment.a. Explain what a residual dividend policy implies, illustrating your answer with a tableshowing how different investment opportunities can lead to different dividend payoutratios.b. Think back to Chapter 14 where we considered the relationship between capital structureand the cost of capital. If the WACC-versus-debt-ratio plot was shaped like a sharp V,would this have a different implication for the importance of setting dividends accordingto the residual policy than if the plot was shaped like a shallow bowl (a flattened U)?
The clientele argument in dividend theory implies that: The stock of low-payout firms will be held by investors seeking capital gains. O The dividend payout should be set equal to the industry average. Investors are indifferent between dividends and capital gains. O Firms should pay out dividends only after accepting all capital budgeting projects with positive NPVs.
Which of the following is a valid reason for a firm not to use as much debt as it can raise? Group of answer choices The use of more debt is expected to result in an increase in the firmʹs cost of capital when everything is considered More debt will increase the firmʹs riskiness All of them are valid reasons for a firm to use less debt than might be available The use of more debt is expected to result in a lower price/earnings ratio
In each of the theories of capital structure, the cost of equity increases as the amount of debt increases. So why don't financial managers use as little debt as possible to keep the cost of equity down? After all, aren't financial managers supposed to maximize the value of a firm?
Can you please assist by clearly answering the question. Please dont copy and paste answers that have been already posted. In each of the theories of capital structure the cost of equity risesas the amount of debt increases. So why don’t financial managers useas little debt as possible to keep the cost of equity down? After all,isn’t the goal of the firm to maximize share value and minimizeshareholder costs?