no Sieve analysis test on 400 gm of sand was conducted with thefollowing records;Sieve No.814 28 3570100 200 pan2.362 1.168 0.589 0.417 0.295 0.147 0.074MDiameter (mm)Mass retained (gm)60100 7248621830A60160B280342360390Total Retained (gm)% finer85604230 D10 2.5a. What of the values of A, B, C and D.b. Determine the grading characteristics of this soil.c. Classify this soil according to its gradation using USCS method.C

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/ed8db1c0-5429-4897-b94c-9024794f5a77.jpg

Answered: a. What of the values of A, B, C and D.…

a. What of the values of A, B, C and D. b. Determine the grading characteristics of this soil. c. Classify this soil according to its gradation using USCS method.

Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap Course List)

5th Edition

ISBN:9781305635180

Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan

Publisher:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan

Chapter3: Weight-volume Relationships And Plasticity

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3.1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

type, d) QA. (5 Marks) Sieve analysis test on 400 gm of sand was conducted with the fo lowing records; Sieve No. 8 14 28 35 70 100 200 pan 2.362 1.168 0.589 0.417 0.295 0.147 0.074 Diameter (mm) Mass retained (gm) 60 100 72 48 62 18 30 A 60 160 B 280 342 360 390 C Total Retained (gm) % finer 85 60 42 30 D 10 2.5 a. What of the values of A, B, C and D. b. Determine the grading characteristics of this soil. c. Classify this soil according to its gradation using USCS method
A 627-g sample of sand was found to have the following amounts of material retained on each sieve/pan: 3/8 in. = 22 g, No. 4 = 45 g, No. 8 = 96 g, No. 16 = 122 g, No. 30 = 163 g. No. 50 86 g, No. 100 = 51 g, No. 200 = 30 g, pan = 11 g a. Calculate the fineness modulus of the sand. b. Is this sieve analysis valid for acceptance purposes? Explain why. c. Does the sand meet the particle size criteria of ASTM C 33. Fully justify your answer (list and check all relevant criteria from ASTM C33)
Determine the Fineness Modulus of the sand given its sieve analysis in the following table. (round to 2nd decimal place) Weight Retained Sieve (g) 3/8 in. 10 No.4 80 No.8 80 No.16 350 No.30 240 No.50 80 No.100 160
If the weight of sample of sand in sieve analysis test was 420 gm and the weight retained on sieve are shown in table below. Is the sand satisfying the specification? Calculate the fineness modulus of sand and what is the average size ? Sieve size 10 2.36 1.18 0.6 0.3 0.15 < 0.15 (mm) Weight 8.4 63 96.6 143 59 34 16 retained (gm) Sieve size Specification limits for cumulative passing (mm) Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 9.5 100 100 100 100 4.75 100 - 90 100 - 90 100 - 90 100 -95 2.36 95 -60 100 - 75 100 - 85 100 - 95 1.18 70 - 30 90 - 55 100 - 75 100 - 90 0.6 34 15 59 - 35 79 - 60 100 - 80 0.3 20 - 5 30 - 8 40 - 12 50 - 15 0.15 10 - 0 10 - 0 10 - 0 15 - 0 < 0.15 ------ ------
Class No= 5202 A 500 g sample of sand in the SSD condition was placed in a jar, which was then filled with water. The combined weight was (your class Number + 1600) g. The weight of jar filled with water only was 1400g. Estimate the bulk specific gravity (SSD) of the sand.
The figure and the table below, shows the results of consolidation test for a soil sample, Find the cc value. TI Applied pressure, kPa 25 50 100 200 400 800 Voids ratio 0.634 0.619 0.583 0.523 0456 0383 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 of 0.35 10 100 1000 PRESSURE 0.15 0.21 0.12 no one 0.30 VOIDS RATIO
• Problem 2--- From the following data of the grain size analysis Sieve size #4 #8 #10 #25 #60 #100 # 200 Pan Sieve opening (mm) 4.76 2.36 2.00 0.71 0.25 0.149 0.074 Determine; a) Cu and Cc system % Finer (by weight) 80 56 51 35 18 13 7 ——— b) classify the soil using the unified soil classification
Q/ What the purpose from sand content measurement, what is the acceptable percentage and size partials
2. Based on the USCS, what is the 20 points percentage of the gravel in this sample? * Sieve Percent 100 Sieve 90 opening (mm) passing (finer) No. 80 70 4 4.75 99.0 60 10 2 94.0 50 20 0.85 67.4 40 30 30 0.6 51.4 20 40 0.425 39.4 10 60 0.25 23.4 140 0.106 13.4 0.01 0.1 1 10 200 0.075 2.0 Particle size (mm) Pan O (a) 0 % O (b) 6% O (c) 1% O (d) 32.6% Percent finer by weight
1. Fineness modulus of the aggregate Weight Retained Sieve Individual Percent Cumulative Percent Percent Passing (g) 4.75mm 31.5 2.36mm 67.6 1.18mm 96.5 600um 111.1 300um 60.5 150um 115.6 75um 17.5 pan 31.5
Three groups of students from the Geotechnical Engineering class collected soil-aggregate samples for laboratory testing from a recycled aggregate processing plant in Palm Beach County, Florida. Three samples, denoted by Soil A, Soil B, and Soil C, were collected from three locations of the aggregate stockpile, and sieve analyses were conducted (see Figure 2.35). (a) (b) Figure 2.35 (a) Soil-aggregate stockpile; (b) sieve analysis (Courtesy of Khaled Sobhan, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida) a. Determine the coefficient of uniformity and the coefficient of gradation for Soils A, B, and C. b. Which one is coarser: Soil A or Soil C? Justify your answer. c. Although the soils are obtained from the same stockpile, why are the curves so different? (Hint: Comment on particle segregation and representative field sampling.) d. Determine the percentages of gravel, sand and fines according to Unified Soil Classification System.
Civil Engineering help Table 1 Test No. Rate of deformation Avg. sample length (mm) Avg. sample diameter (mm) Ring factor Cell pressure (kPa) (mm/min). (AIP/N) 100 74.7 38.1 1.27 0.9845 400 75.3 37.7 Table 2 Deformation (mm) Force gauge (divisions) Test 1 Test 2 0.5 22 24 1.0 46 44 1.5 2.0 62 68 80 82 2.5 102 106 132 3.0 121 134 3.5 149 4.0 157 173 5.0 6.0 7.0 182 200 219 231 241 194 195 8.0 197 90 198 200 199 | 196 246 10.0 252 251 244 11.0 12.0 By producing Mohr circles and deviatoric stress vs axial strain plots of the tests using the data presented, determine the average Young's modulus, E (MPa) from the most linear portion of the tests deviatoric stress vs axial strain nints Enterani l ...