a. In game theory, when firms plan to participate in the market for the foreseeable future, it is known as a multiple choice 1 repeated game. continuous market. highly competitive market. long game tree. b. When producers plan to participate in the market for the foreseeable future they are more likely to multiple choice 2 collude. act aggressively.

Economics Over the past decade, holiday gift cards have become increasingly popular at online retailers. Not long ago, online shoppers had to really hunt at most e-retailer' sites to purchase a gift card, but today it is easier to purchase gift cards online than at traditional retail outlets. Provide a comprehensive initial post answering the following questions: Do you think online gift cards are merely a fad? Explain carefully.

A B C

Which one of the following statements about the Bertrand model is incorrect?   A. The strategic variables of the game are the prices.   B. With homogeneous product and identical constant marginal cost among the firms, the Nash equilibrium outcome is referred to as the "Bertrand paradox".   C. The Bertrand model and its predictions differ from the Cournot model in important ways.   D. One of the above is incorrect.

Up Down Up Down Player 1 In the game above, what is/are the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? (up,up) (up,down) (down, up) (down, down) No equilibrium exists Up Down Player 2 eLearning Help P1 gets $45 P2 gets $155 P1 gets $100 P2 gets $10 P1 gets $85 P2 gets $85 P1 gets $95 P2 gets $95

In Game Theory, there is an incentive to cheat.  Please explain both the prisoner’s dilemma and the payoff matrix related to this incentive to cheat.  Why can Game Theory be an effective way to conduct business strategy?  Why is it important to understand what industry you are in before you can develop a strategy in Game Theory?

How is a Nash equilibrium outcome different from a rationalizable outcome? In a Nash equilibrium players are allowed to randomise. Rationalizable outcomes apply to dynamic games whereas Nash equilibrium does not. In a Nash equilibrium each player always has the correct conjecture about what the other player will do. Nash equilibrium only allows for unilateral changes in strategy. None of the above. No Answer

The payoff matrix in the figure to the right shows the payoffs for a pricing game. If you were firm A, which strategy would you choose? Firm A should A. price high because this is their maximin strategy. B. price low because this is their tit-for-tat strategy. C. price high because this is their dominant strategy. D. price low because this is their dominant strategy. E. price low because this maximizes profits of both firms. Firm B's dominant strategy is to price If this game were repeated a large number of times and you were firm A and you could change your strategy, what might you do? Firm A should O A. use a tit-for-tat strategy by responding in kind to firm B's play. B. use a maximin strategy by maximizing the minimum gain that can be earned. C. use a tit-for-tat strategy by selecting a price that minimizes firm B's profits. D. use a maximin strategy by by responding in kind to firm B's play. E. use a tit-for-tat strategy by maximizing the minimum gain that can be earned. C Price…

Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m)     Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate   No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change     30, 40      25, 35    15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores     35, 30      28, 32    18, 33 Large Expansion     12, 22     18, 20    20, 25   The Nash equilibrium:            (A)       does not exist. (B)       occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores.              (C)       occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D)       occurs when both firms choose No Change.

QUESTION 2 In the game above, what is/are the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? (up, up) (up, down) ( down, up) (down, down) No equilibrium exists QUESTION 2 Up Down Player 1 No equilibrium exists Up In the game above, what is/are the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? (up,up) (up,down) (down, up) □ (down, down) Down Up Down Player 2 P1 gets $45 P2 gets $155 P1 gets $100 P2 gets $10 P1 gets $85 P2 gets $85 P1 gets $95 P2 gets $95