ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
a group of sovereign nations continues to hold the market output at QC. Now suppose scientists discover that the output of this cartel has strong positive externalities for society.
- Define the term “positive externality.” Explain the impact of this positive externality on the market P and Q.
- Graphically, what is the Socially Optimal amount of Q? (Use QSOC to indicate this quantity). Explain how you arrived at this output and compare this output to both
perfectly competitive market output Q0 and the cartel output QC. - Graphically indicate the size of
deadweight loss (if there is any DWL), comparing the cartel-determined level of output and the socially optimal output that takes into account positive externalities.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps with 3 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Some economies are less healthy than they could be because both the market power and economic profit of some favored firms are protected by either government or some private force (e.g. mafia). Present a firm that has market power and is earning economic profit when it is maximizing profit. Explain how competition could help consumers by showing how the profit maximizing point for this firm might change, to the advantage of consumers, if competitors entered this market and competed against this firm.arrow_forwardDo this problem using excel solver. Africa controls 80% of the world's lithium refining, a material needed for the production of lithium batteries in electric vehicles. The demand for lithium batteries is P = $20,000 - 2.5 Q, where Q is in tons and P is in $/ton. The long run marginal and average cost of production is constant at $2,000/ton. a) Assuming the monopoly model applies, determine price, quantity, and profit for Africa using excel solver b) Now assume new firms enter the lithium market, resulting in (perfect) competition. Determine the price, quantity, and profits, when the industry is in (long run) equilibrium using excel solver c) Finally, compare social welfare for the two cases, and determine deadweight loss using excel solver.arrow_forwardB,C,Darrow_forward
- *YOU ONLY NEED TO ANSWER QUESTION C*arrow_forwardShow that if Pete increases production by 100 utensils he will earn more profit, assuming that Pat sticks with the quantity you found above, which is half of what would be produced if the industry were controlled by a monopoly. Next, calculate what profit each would make if Pat also cheats by producing 100 more utensils. Assuming that they both calculate that the other will "cheat" and produce at this higher amount, would either have an incentive to further overproduce? What would happen to either seller's profit by producing another 100 more units? If cheating beyond this point will drive down one's own profit, and thus is not in anyone's interest, could this point be called a "Nash" equilibrium?arrow_forwardAnswer the following for the given example (for a perfectly competitive market): Your neighbours holding a physical gathering during the pandemic (a) Does an externality exist? If so, is it positive/negative (or both) (b) Use Coase’s framework to identify the cause of the externality (c) If an externality exists, determine whether the Coase theorem applies (i.e. is it possible/feasible to assign property rights and solve the problem?). Provide reasoning. (d) If an externality exists and the Coase theorem does not apply, discuss a government/institutional solution that can mitigate the problem of externality. Provide reasoning.arrow_forward
- Consider the following simplified scenario. Imagine that the Australian national rugby union (for short, Rugby AU) has exclusive rights to organize the games played by the national team. Rugby AU decides that the next match, between the Wallabies and the All Blacks (i.e., the Australian and the New Zeeland national rugby teams), will be hosted at the Marvel Stadium in Melbourne. Rugby AU has no fixed costs for organizing the game, but it must pay a marginal cost MC of $20 per seat to the owners of the Marvel Stadium. Two types of tickets will be sold for the game: concession and full fare. Based on any official document that attests to their age, children and pensioners qualify to purchase concession tickets that offer a discounted price; everyone else pays the full fare. The demand for full-fare tickets is QF(P) = 120 – 2P. The demand for concession tickets is QC(P) = 80 – 2P. 1. The market for full fare tickets (F)a) Calculate the inverse demand, write the profit maximizing…arrow_forwardA monopoly produces a good with a network externality at a constant marginal and average cost of c = $2. In the first period, its inverse demand curve is p 14-1Q. In the second period, its inverse demand curve is p=14-1Q unless it sells at least Q = 8 units in the first period. If it meets or exceeds this target, then the demand curve rotates out by a (it sells a times as many units for any given price), so that its inverse demand curve is p=14- - 1/10. The monopoly knows that it can sell no output after the second period. The monopoly's objective is to maximize the sum of its profits over the two periods. For what values of a would the monopoly earn a higher two-period profit by setting a lower price in the first period? . (round your answer to two decimal places) If a isarrow_forwardthe answers shown for the part c are incorrectarrow_forward
- ******ONLY ANSWER PART 3 IN PICTURE PLEASE**** Demand for Thunder games in Oklahoma City is given by: P(0)=430-20 Seattle does not currently have an NBA team, but they would like to attract the the Thunder. ok ok ok Demand for Thunder games in Seattle is given by: P (Q) = 490 -20 The marginal cost of production in both cities is constant at MC = 70. Suppose that the Thunder faces an extra fixed cost of 10000 in Seattle because they need to build a new stadium if they move. If the Thunder decides to stay in Oklahoma City, they don't need to pay the fixed cost. Cities can still offer bids to attract the team. a) Will the Thunder move to Seattle? b) How much is the winning bid? c) What is the profit plus bid for the Thunder? d) What is the value minus bid for the winning city?arrow_forwardThe three graphs below illustrate the market for electricity. The distribution of electricity is a natural monopoly; therefore, to take advantage of lower production costs, it is efficient to have only one firm in the market. Unfortunately, if a monopoly were allowed to provide electricity, it would charge a higher price and provide a smaller amount of electricity than would be desirable. In other words, the unregulated monopoly would charge the monopoly's profit-maximizing price. To avoid this, the government will allow a single firm to provide electricity, but the government will regulate the price. Let’s compare possible regulatory solutions.arrow_forwardFor each of the following statements, tell whether the statement is TRUE, FALSE, or UNCERTAIN, and explain your reasoning. a) If the good produced by a monopoly causes positive externalities, then the extra benefit of the positive externalities will mitigate any deadweight loss caused by the monopoly's pricing power. b) When income rises, a demand curve will always shift out, increasing the quantity that will be bought at all price levels. c) The demand for a good will shift inward when the price of a complementary good increases d) If rent control is imposed in a city then this will cause landlords in neighboring cities to lower their rents to compete with landlords in the rent-controlled city; otherwise, they will lose tenants to the rent-controlled cityarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education